1. Most of us do not really appreciate how resilient children and their immune systems are when they encounter #sarscov2. Most kids don’t even realize they have been exposed, which leads to ⬆️⬆️⬆️ over-estimation of the long-term effects of #COVID19 in children

Here’s why … 🧵
2/ when asked, most parents don’t even realize when they child was exposed to #SARS_CoV_2 because most kids either remain asymptomatic or have such a mild and transient illness that parents don’t even associate the illness with #COVID19
3/ In our primary schools study, although small numbers, parents reported no symptoms in 85% of kids who didn’t have #SARS_CoV_2 antibodies at start of the study & then developed antibodies during the study (ie. got infected) compared to 47% of staff
👉 thelancet.com/journals/lanch…
4/ In secondary schools too, although small numbers again, 67% of students who seroconverted (got infected & developed #SARSCoV2 antibodies) during the study reported having no symptoms at all compared to 24% of staff

👉 thelancet.com/journals/eclin…
5/ Importantly, antibody responses after symptomatic & asymptomatic infection in students were indistinguishable 👉 even asymptomatic infection leads to robust immune responses in kids, both in terms of amount of antibody & their ability to kill virus 👉 medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
6/ Also, some kids appear to have T cell (cellular) immunity against #SARS_CoV_2 even without antibodies against the virus. We think this might reflect cross-protection from previous coronavirus infections but this needs further work for confirmation 👉 medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
7/ So, when trying to estimate risk of severe #COVID19 or #LongCovid, remember that most kids do not even develop any symptoms after virus exposure & some kids may be inherently protected from cellular immunity. Surely these kids can’t be at risk of severe or long covid.

End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shamez Ladhani

Shamez Ladhani Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ShamezLadhani

16 Jul
1/ We studied the quality,
quantity and persistence of #SARSCoV2 antibodies in primary school students (6-11 year-olds) compared to staff (adults) over 6 months (until ~7-8 months after their #SARSCoV2 infection)

Here’s what we found (pre-print) 🧵

👉 medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
2/ The proportion of students & staff who had #SARSCoV2 antibodies in back June 2020 was similar:

👉 11.5% (95%CI, 9.4-13.9) & 11.3% (95%CI, 9.2-13.6; p=0.88) students had nucleoprotein & RBD antibodies vs 15.6% (95%CI, 13.7-17.6) & 15.3% (95%CI, 13.4-17.3; p=0.83) staff
3/ Live virus neutralising activity (ability of antibody to kill #SARSCoV2) was detected in 79.8% (71/89) of N antibody & 85.5% (71/83) of RBD antibody positive kids. RBD correlated more strongly with neutralising activity (rs=0.75; p<0.0001) than N antibodies (rs=0.37; p<0.0001)
Read 7 tweets
16 Jul
1/ We developed & validated an oral fluid assay to measure #SARSCoV2 antibodies. Basically it’s a lollipop stick with a sponge that collects oral fluid (saliva) from around cheeks/gums. Kids can do the test themselves & sample can be posted to the lab 🧵👉 medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
2/ Here’s the technical stuff: We used contemporaneous blood & oral fluid samples from ~2,000 kids & adults taking part in our school studies and developed 3 different oral fluid assays for testing & validating: N-antibody, Spike-antibody & RBD-antibody 👉 medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
3/ The N-protein capture assay was the best candidate, sensitivity 75% (95%CI, 71–79%) specificity 99% (95% CI: 78–99%) when compared with paired serum antibodies, but higher sensitivity in kids (80%, 95% CI: 71–88%) than adults (67%, CI: 60%-74%) 👉 medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Read 5 tweets
11 Jul
1/9. In England, #SARSCoV2 infection rates in school-aged kids & #COVID19 outbreaks have both ⬆️ in recent weeks (latest data 4 July) but that does not change the narrative on kids & their role in infection/transmission in school

Here’s why … 🧵

👉 assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
2/9. No one has claimed that kids don’t get infected or don’t transmit #SARSCoV2 to others. But the data suggest that lower risk with kids than adults. Eg. We don’t see two-thirds of staff/students infected in a single outbreak as we do in care homes 👉 thelancet.com/journals/eclin…
3/9. We & others have shown that #SARSCoV2 cases & outbreaks reflect community infection rates. Cases in kids generally follow adults *unless* adults are in lockdown & kids continue to go to school. This happened in Nov/Dec 2020 & Mar/Apr 2021. See👇👇

👉 journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-…
Read 9 tweets
10 Jul
1/5. Mental health of Adolescents in the Pandemic: Long-COVID19 or Long-Pandemic Syndrome? (pre-print, thanks @MaryKRe)

Here’s another case-control study on long covid that measured #SARSCoV2 antibodies in teenagers

Here’s what they found … 🧵

👉 medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
2/5. 1560 kids (median age 15y):
- 188 (12%) seropositive (exposed to #SARSCoV2)
- 1365 (88%) seronegative (never exposed)

If you think this sample size is small, try bleeding 1500 teens!

They were asked the same questions ➡️ responses were near-identical in cases & controls
3/5. The authors did a subgroup analysis & found near-identical responses in teenagers who knew their #SARSCoV2 infection status vs those who didn’t

Yes, small samples size, but not even a signal of any difference in mental health status (see table👇)

👉 medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Read 5 tweets
9 Jul
1/4 Childhood #COVID19 deaths. This preprint by @RCPCHtweets & @PHE_uk provides critical new information about #SARSCoV2 and kids which we didn’t have until now. Here’s why the small numbers in this paper matter 🧵

👉 researchsquare.com/article/rs-689…
2/4 Death is the most objective outcome & can be accurately measured in countries like England. The results show ~3,000 of 12 million kids died in 1 year & only 61 with #SARSCoV2. Detailed medical record analysis showed only 25 (42%) died *of* #COVID19

👉 researchsquare.com/article/rs-689…
3/4. Of the 25 kids who died of #COVID19, 19/25 (76%) had underlying conditions & of these 15/19 (60%) had a life-limiting condition & mostly with 2 or more medical conditions, esp. severe neurological conditions

👉 25 fatalities = 2 per million kids

👉researchsquare.com/article/rs-689…
Read 4 tweets
9 Jul
1/5 Both Pfizer & AZ vaccines are highly protective against severe #COVID19, especially after 2 doses.

Here’s why it’s better to stick to the same vaccine brand for both #COVID19 vaccine doses even after severe reaction following the 1st dose 🧵

👉 papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
2/5 Compared to 2 doses of the same vaccine brand, mixing Pfizer/AZ vaccines was associated with higher rates of severe reactions & requiring medical attention after the 2nd dose: esp. in younger adults, in women & in those with previous #COVID19 🧵

👉papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
3/5 Adults who had a severe reaction after their 1st dose of #COVID19 were more likely to have a severe reaction after 2nd dose, whichever vaccine they received, but risk of severe reactions increased if 2 different vaccine (AZ/Pfizer) brands given 🧵

👉 papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(