The main damage from this is deal lies somewhere else & I'm not sure Americans realize it.
In having to make tough choices, US ultimately decided to side w/ Germany, throwing CEE under the bus. From US short-term perspective that choice may have been obvious. 1/n
But it will have DESTRUCTIVE implications in CEE foreign policy. These countries always looked to America as a beacon of hope. A trustworthy ally. Guarantor of security. All these countries have been betrayed in the past. But not by America. America was reliable. 2/n
There are ongoing discussions in CEE. Should we really by so US oriented? Hasn't Trump shown us that one stupid election can change everything? Maybe we should actually reassess the relationship with Russia? Or bet on China, the 3rd power? 3/n
Yet the populations of many of CEE countries were still with America. America was reliable. America understood Russia and Europe. They would not let us down. 4/n
All this happening while Ukraine is literally being eaten alive. Step by step. Crimea. Donbas. Russian mobilization along the borders. What does the West do? Germany? France? UK? US? Not much. Not much. 5/n
Multiple analyses show NATO presence on the Eastern flank is insufficient to defend against a surprise Russian attack on the Balkans. Is NATO art. 5 guarantee solid? If it is, why don't we have sufficient NATO presence to make it clear an attack has no chances of success? 6/n
So this Nord Stream 2 deal comes with massive, massive baggage. CEE are skeptical about UE. About France. 75 years after the war, sadly, mistrust of Germany runs deep in this part of Europe. But America understands this, right? America is solid, right? 7/n
Anything even broadly connected to a German - Russian deal, behind the backs of CEE, has massive, tremendously painful implications. Poland, others disappeared from the map for almost two centuries when these two made deals. 8/n
Ribbentrop & Molotov pact started World War 2, ushering the period of completely unfathomable destruction. These countries got razed by Germany & Russia first, then by Germany, lastly by Russia again. Nothing was left when these two were done with us. 9/n
So back to NS2. German-Russian deal made behind our back, opposed by most of the region. No big deal, just a bunch of pipes, gas. No biggie, surely. WRONG. Massive symbolism, massive negative, historical, war connotations. 10/n
It is perhaps sad & deplorable, but can't escape history & symbolism. Not in this part of Europe where symbols carried us forward & gave us hope when that was all that we had. Symbols, analogies, connotations, suspicions and conspiracies: it's the fuel this region runs on. 11/n
But America was above all this. America was solid. They understood and faced off the Russians, the beat the Germans, they were solid. They knew our insecurities and watched our backs. They would never let us down. Not vs. Germany, not vs. Russians. 12/n
I'm sure Americans are thinking: Give me a break. Don't exaggerate. Its a stupid pipeline. Plenty of them around the world, each country has bunch of them. One bunch of pipes wont affect much. 13/n
Wrong again. It's not abt the pipes. It's abt US showing us Germany is more important to them. Even if our fears and concerns are overblown, America should have understood that. 14/n
We've this silly belief we have a special place in American hearts. Nonsense, but ppl in PL believe this, all evidence to the contrary notwithstanding.
Selling us down the river, to improve relationship with - of all countries - Germany, will be seen as massive betrayal.15/n
That NS2 is btw the two states that wreaked the most damage in CEE, that the deal cannot be explained in any other way than egoistic industrial interests of Germany, that the cash paid for gas will found RU forces occupying Ukraine, makes US decision even harder to fathom. 16/n
To make it clear: I understand what drove Biden's decision. But US interests in CEE have suffered an immeasurable damage. 17/n
Russian trolls, Russian propaganda will surely use this to cast more doubt about US commitment to the region. Pro-Russian parties will get a boost. Politics of the region will change, and this is the decision that will have made that happen. 18/18
Case on point: 👇
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today, EU finally imposed further economic #sanctions on #Belarus, perhaps finalizing EU's multi-prong reaction to the hijacking of RyanAir flight on May 23rd.
This (long) thread will analyze where we are today and what actually has been achieved. (thread)
The previous situation is described here. 👇
Prior to RyanAir incident, EU had (1) asset freezes, (2) visa/entry bans; (3) arms embargo, (4) ban on exports of equipment used for internal repression. /1
Following the RyanAir incident, the EU reacted in three steps:
- June 4: banning of Belarusian air flights from EU airspace;
- June 21: massive expansion of asset freezes & visa bans; and
- June 24: significant expansion of economic sanctions. /2
As the cat seems to be out of the bag, and most people following EU #CBAM discussions have seen some draft of the proposal, let me share with those out of the loop some info on the structure of the proposal. /Thread
First, CBAM will first apply to 4 pre-selected sectors., listed in Annex I These are - for the time being - electricity, fertilizer inputs plus some selected fertilizers, cement, many iron & steel products, plus aluminum 1/n
Cant speak for other products, but for fertilizers, the list is clearly too short. Main inputs (ammonia + nitric acid) and only two finished products: urea and some ammonium nitrate. 2/n
Od dłuższego czasu postuluję, abyśmy - zamiast biadolić, jak to Niemcy z Rosjanami budują projekty uderzające w bezpieczeństwo naszego państwa, lub jak to niemieccy urzędnicy zajmują miejsca w organach państwowych firm rosyjskich - zaczęli to jawnie zwalczać za pomocą sankcji. /1
Pytanie oczywiście brzmi - jakich konkretnie sankcji? Sankcje to luźne hasło, pod którym kryć się mogą różne środki, od zakazu wjazdu, przez zamrożenie aktywów, zakaz transakcji, wykluczenie z przetargów, zakaz finansowania, zakaz inwestycji, embargo handlowe i inne. /2
Ideą przewodnią sankcji jest to, że atakujemy interesy i prawa podmiotu objętego sankcjami, w jakimś sensie ograniczamy ich prawa lub swobody. Ale jedynym ogranicznikiem typu sankcji jest nasza własna pomysłowość. /3
I am hearing a lot of doubts whether EU and the West have any economic pressure over Belarus.
Here are some quick & obvious targets for trade sanctions. (thread)
By hitting: (1) oil & fuels (2) iron, steel, metallurgy (3) chemicals & fertilizers
the West would be hitting about a third of BLR trade. /2
First, fuel, oil & minerals. Almost 7 bln USD in exports look sanctionable. Key player is Ukraine, which may not be able to join due to Kyiv's reliance on some energy-related imports from BLR. But below some examples. /3
As a preliminary matter, remember European Council doesnt impose sanctions. It only sets direction EU will take. Preparation of laws must be done in conformity with EU treaties. This involves (in sanctions) the European Commission, External Action Service and the Council. /2
So first, conclusions call for "additional listings of persons and entities ... on the basis of the relevant sanctions framework". /3
As Belarus sanctions will be high on everyone radar tomorrow and the weeks to come, perhaps it would be helpful to recall where we are today. (thread)
The principal EU act on Belarus sanctions is Council Decision 2012/642, which lays out the scheme of EU sanctions on Belarus. These sanctions had their ups and downs, but after recent presidential elections are a hot topic again and given today's events may become red hot. /1
As Council Decision provides for both EU-level measures and Member State measures, it is implemented at both EU and national level. At the EU level, it is implemented by Council Regulation 765/2006. Some of Annexes w/ listed persons are amended by Council Implementing Regs. /2