1. On the second anniversary of the #ElPasoShooting, #Mexico is suing 10 US gun manufacturers and distributors for their responsibility in flooding the nation with arms.
Some 70-90% of the arms found at Mexican crime scenes can be traced to the US.
2. US manufacturers make some $250 million a year on selling arms to Mexico, knowingly targeting the market with guns that have Spanish nicknames, quotes, even the engraving of Emiliano Zapata's face (the model used in the killing of journalist Miroslava Breach by Sinaloa Cartel)
3. As I wrote at the time of the shooting, Mexico's strict gun-control laws are constantly undermined by US laxity. Indeed, nearly 1/2 of US dealers depend upon sales to Mexico to survive. Illegal trafficking of arms to Mexico isn't even a federal crime.
4. Due to 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which shields manufacturers/dealers from liability, it will be a very difficult case for Mexico to win. However, litigation can proceed if, for example, manufacturers have violated state/federal laws with their marketing.
5. Even if it doesn't win in court, it's important for Mexico to no longer take the flooding of its territory with US weaponry lying down. This is true terrorism, which claims its victims every day of the year, while gun manufacturers pocket the profits and share the dividends.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. The #PegasusProject reveals the extent of the police state created in #Mexico under presidents Felipe Calderón and Enrique Peña Nieto: using software from the Israeli firm #NSO, some 15,000 numbers were potentially hacked, including 25+ journalists...
3. The software was originally purchased by Calderón -NSO's first international client- whose Defense Department made a massive purchase in 2011. His Security Minister García Luna was also heavily involved in Israeli-exported spy technologies.
1. In another attempt to disqualify Mexico's referendum on prosecuting crimes of prior administrations, the Right's new coordinated talking point is that the question is "too complicated."
True to form, @TheEconomist incorporates this in another of its amusing anti-#AMLO rants.
2. The original, crystal-clear question submitted by the president was modified by the Supreme Court, a question the magazine's hacks only mention in passing after mockingly leading you to believe the "absurdist" wording was written by AMLO. Here's the original text:
3. "Do you agree or not that the competent authorities, in accordance with the law and applicable procedures, investigate and, as appropriate, sanction the alleged commission of crimes by former presidents [names] before, during, and after their respective administrations?"
THREAD: In my latest piece in Jacobin, I lay out a (non-exhaustive) list of areas @PartidoMorenaMx should tackle in the next session of Congress in order to maintain its mid-term momentum. These include:
1. On May 3, we bought two, 20 kg cylinders of natural gas for $800 pesos in Oaxaca. Today, the same two cost $928, a 16% increase.
In response to these & other increases, #AMLO announced this week the creation of a public gas distributor. Of course, the Right went apoplectic...
2. Either arguing against intervention in the "market" or contending there were "other ways" to control these increases, without saying what they were.
Three companies control the gas market here. This is an oligopoly, something the Right used to be against -or pretended to be.
3. Mexico is full of such oligopolies, from media (TV, newspapers) to pharmaceuticals to banks to supermarkets. And every time AMLO goes after one of them, the response is vicious. Just look at how the drug companies have been trying to protect theirs:
1. "On this July 4, we would do well to renounce nationalism and all its symbols: its flags, its pledges of allegiance, its anthems, its insistence in song that God must single out America to be blessed...
2. "Our citizenry has been brought up to see our nation as different from others, an exception in the world, uniquely moral, expanding into other lands in order to bring civilization, liberty, democracy. That self-deception started early.
3. "When the first English settlers moved into Indian land in Massachusetts Bay and were resisted, the violence escalated into war with the Pequot Indians. The killing of Indians was seen as approved by God, the taking of land as commanded by the Bible.
THREAD: Mexico's August 1 referendum as to whether to investigate former presidents & other actors for past crimes will be hindered by the fact that the National Electoral Institute is only setting up 57,000 precincts, a fraction of last month's midterms.
2. The Institute claims it simply doesn't have the money to set up more precincts. But as @HernanGomezB points out, the real truth is that the directors blow their budget on obscene salaries, benefits, bonuses, "advisers", meal budgets, and more.
3. The number of precincts is important, because the referendum needs a 40% participation rate in order to be legally binding. Offering fewer places to vote -with the longer lines that will ensue- is effectively a way to sabotage the vote.