As news of the Taliban’s first military takeover of a provincial capital after 20 years of fighting is breaking, here’s a thread [I hope to evolve] about what Washington is thinking about Afghanistan.
There are two schools in Washington for Afghanistan: the first thinks that the Taliban are doing whatever they’re doing to gain leverage in the peace process; that if Ashraf Ghani relents, then the talks will lead to a some kind of power sharing agreement.
This school believes that the Taliban are more savvy than they seem; that they will not gun for a total military takeover & risk pariah status; that current military gains are actually brinksmanship & that Ghani must relent. This school thinks that, ultimately, talking will work.
A second school is emerging; this school is more skeptical, more conservative; it thinks that the Taliban are worse than they were before; that they’re hell bent on a military victory, which will be converted into a political victory. This school thinks the peace talks are dead.
This school also thinks that hitting the Taliban with air strikes, aiding Afghan forces, especially the Air Force, will help stop the Taliban advance; it also thinks that pressuring, even sanctioning Taliban abettors will work. This school is adopting an anti-Biden theme.
Both schools are playing with fire; the first one is betting on the talks to restart. But why would the talks restart when the Taliban are winning? Only if Ghani offers them something big to stop the fighting. Like Zalmay Khalilzad has said: the Taliban want the “lion’s share.”
The other side is betting on their criticism, the voices of Afghan civil society, international media and diplomacy etc to develop enough momentum to a) increase skepticism against the Taliban & b) convert that skepticism into isolation or sanctions against them & their backers.
But short of critiquing the Taliban or their “backers” (using that term broadly) in Islamabad or Tehran or Moscow or Beijing (more on them soon); or the pro-talk Biden/Blinken/Khalilzad gang, this school doesn’t have any solutions except more fighting or more pressure /sanctions.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Wajahat S. Khan | کوئٹہ کا پٹھان

Wajahat S. Khan | کوئٹہ کا پٹھان Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WajSKhan

26 Jul
THREAD: Is China heading towards CT/COIN in Afghanistan?

Early July, FM Wang Yi [before attack on Chinese engineers in Pak] said Beijing wants to:
"effectively contain spillover of Afghanistan's security risks, and ensure overall stability in the region."
fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_6…
Late July, post Dasu attack, Beijing started hyphenating Afghanistan with Pak attack. Asked "all parties concerned in Afghanistan to fully observe the ceasefire" but also vowed to "severely punish the perpetrators [of the attack on Chinese engineers]."

fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_6…
Over the weekend, promoting itself as lead proponent of peace, Beijing indicated that it has successfully signed on Pakistan as a helper in Afghan peace process:

"Pakistan is willing to work closely with China to push forward Afghanistan's peace"

fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_6…
Read 20 tweets
4 Mar
#ReportingPakistan

In an unexpected electoral setback which is shocking, even by #Pakistan's turbulent standards, cricketer-turned-prime minister #ImranKhan faces a crucial #VoteOfConfidence.

Here's a look at @ImranKhanPTI's political career, spanning over two decades.
Propelled by his celebrity & supported by his (now former) wife @Jemima_Khan, Khan's early political career saw him adopt the role of international activist. Here, in 1997, he's on a tour of South Africa with then-President Nelson Mandela.
Philanthropy would form the basis of his politics. The Shaukat Khanum, Pakistan's first cancer research hospital, would be inspired by his mother's demise & become his showcase for organizational change. Months before her own death in 1997, Princess Diana would help raise funds.
Read 24 tweets
26 Jul 20
Full disclosure for this thread: I don't vote. I follow the old ethical tenet that journalists & judges shouldn't vote.

Exactly two years ago, I was excited to see @ImranKhanPTI win an election & assume the helm of affairs in Pakistan, the country of my birth.

So although...
...I didn't vote, I was still excited to see him win.

Why?

See, with the 2018 polls @ImranKhanPTI had done what few politicians can do: he'd broken a system.

In this case, Pakistan's notorious -- and static -- two-party system.
Admittedly, not a lot politicians can challenge entrenched machines.

Many a candidate has tried to break America's two-party system. It hasn't worked. Examples abound in other democracies, too.

However, like Z.A. Bhutto before him (who broke the one-party system in Pak)...
Read 25 tweets
22 Aug 19
Received legal notices from @twitter for two days straight: the Gov of India has complained that I’ve violated the “laws of India.”

Till yesterday, @twitter cited certain tweets to be problematic (for India).

Today, my account @wajskhan in general is allegedly in violation.
So far, @twitter has been very straightforward, giving me my legal options.

Till yesterday, I was advised that among my choices, deleting certain tweets was one option.

However, not quite sure what to do today, considering my entire account - active since ‘09 - is at stake.
I’ve written back to @twitter but not heard back.

I worry that my account may be removed because of my critique of India’s policies & actions in #Kashmir.

Also believe that social media, already blacked out by India in Kashmir, is crucial for global discourse & truth-telling.
Read 7 tweets
19 Aug 19
Lets talk about this clearly:

Imran Khan & Gen QJ Bajwa find themselves in a very different power equation versus the last two civilian administrations & the last two #COAS's

'08-'11, Gen Kayani & the Zardari regime were clearly cat-&-mousing for most of Kayani's 1st tenure.
Compulsions: The Lawyers' Movement, NRO, Musharraf's uniform, Memogate (some of Kayani's productions or co-productions, backed by foreign supporters). Then, post-Osama/Raymond Davis, Kayani was deployed to stabilize rudder by an atrophied Zardari. Not much of a choice for PPP.
That Kayani's personal interests & connections compromised his standing within & without the institution he was once revered by was clear by the middle of his 2nd term.

Soon after he was done, even junior officers weren't refraining for calling him 'agent' & 'mixed up'
Read 19 tweets
16 Aug 19
Pakistan’s leadership is building up a serious case against India, but so far, most of its been for domestic audiences.

Internationally, @ImranKhanPTI hasn’t been able to really sell his cause for #Kashmir. The UNSC consultation today is a test case of Pak’s diplomatic muscle.
Failure in New York by @MOFAPakistan will further build up frustration at home - especially in the rank & file of the military - and increasingly validate the hawks to position Pakistan to launch an asymmetric war, if not conventional operations against India.
The last time Pakistanis needed such existential validation was after their fall in 1971.

Consequently, nukes & Islamization were experimented with by civ & military governments alike. A Constitution was birthed & prolifically amended to support national security & identity.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(