#BombayHighCourt to shortly pronounce the interim order in the pleas filed by Mumbai journalist and digital news portal challenging the recently notified #ITRules2021.
The petitioners had sought an interim stay on the application of the #ITRules2021 till the Writ Petition challenging the Rules was decided on merits.
Order: We may observe that as far as Rule 14 is concerned , no immediate urgency as Committee is not set up.
In these circumstances, oversight committee itself has not taken affect. We urge petitioners to come as and when it set up .
Order: We find no case is made out for stay on Rule 16. Hence that is not stayed.
Rule 9 prima facie seems to be against the freedom of speech. We have stayed Rule 9 (1) and (3) and not (2). We have not granted stay on Rule 7.
Order: Rule issued. 3 weeks to file detailed reply.
Rule 9 (of IT Rules) an intrusion on the petitioner's rights under Article 19(1)(a) and goes beyond the substantive law of the Information Technology Act. - #BombayHighCourt
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#SupremeCourt hearing a batch of petitions seeking protection from any coercive action in a money laundering case registered by the Enforcement Directorate @dir_ed
SG Mehta: The questions which are raised in these petitions can be read in connection with 2 judgements of Delhi HC and one of Bombay HC & one of Karnataka HC against me
SG: There was difference of views & thereafter there was a request to transfer the cases. The practice of not passing any coercive steps in the form of interim relief was stopped thereafter
#SupremeCourt to hear NLSIU appeal against an order of the Karnataka High Court which directed the promotion of a student to next year. The top court had stayed the order of the High Court during the earlier hearing @NLSIUofficial
Senior Advocate Paramjit Singh Patwalia: Today i am a student pursuing my studies in NSLIU. Allow me to attend 5th year classes. This whole litigation is rather unfortunate & i was pushed into it. I dont want to fight against my alma matter
Sr Adv Patwalia: Time is running for me. Please list it within 1 or 2 days. I dont want to miss my classes. Please allow me to attend my classes.
Justice Kaul: An adjournment letter has
been circulated.
Supreme Court bench led by Justice DY Chandrachud to hear a plea today seeking rehabilitation of over 8,000 mentally ill persons who have recovered or are fine but are still languishing in mental asylums and hospitals. #supremecourt#mentalhealth
Amicus Curiae Gaurav Bhansal had stated that every state was mandated to set up a Mental Healthcare Review Board, but only Karnataka has done so. #supremecourt had directed all states to provide requisite data to the Centre during the July 12 meeting
Justice DY. Chandrachud to Justice M.R. Shah: They want an extension of four weeks to comply with your directions.
#SupremeCourt to hear a petition seeking directions for the constitution of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) appellate tribunal which had not been set up even after 4 years of the GST Act being in existence. CJI Ramana had asked Centre if it wants all #tribunals wrapped up
#SupremeCourt had taken strong exception to the delay by the Central government in filling up vacancies in various tribunals across the country effectively crippling their functioning and leaving people without legal remedies
CJI NV Ramana led bench to hear a batch of petitions seeking various prayers including a court monitored probe, a judicial inquiry & directions to the government to reveal details about whether it had used the Pegasus software to spy on citizens
Appearing for the Central government, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had sought for more time to reply. Hence the matter is listed today. No official notice has been issued to the Centre yet #supremecourt#pegasus
Former RSS ideologue KN Govindacharya has filed an application to revive his 2019 petition seeking a probe into the #Pegasus scandal which he had withdrawn to explore alternative remedies #supremecourt@KGovindacharya
[BREAKING] CJI NV Ramana laments the lack of debates in parliament and hows laws with "gaps" are being passed. #supremecourt#CJIRamana
1/n: "Earlier different, different laws used to be discussed and elaborated in the parliament."
2/n CJI Ramana: So the burden of the courts while interpreting or implementing the law is less. So the legislative part was clear with respect to what they want to tell us. #supremecourt#CJIRamana
3/n CJI Ramana: Why they are making such a legislation. Now it is sorry state of affairs, now we see legislation with sorry state of affairs. Now we see legislations with lot of gaps, and lot of ambiguity in making laws. #supremecourt#CJIRamana