I think likely then, it really was Greer that told Mitchell, just as I mentioned in this video (maybe he admitted it?). Or Miller, who worked for Greer?
Either way, the more you dig, the more doubt there is. THANK YOU to viewer "NotAWine Mom" for pointing out Mitchell's quote.
Why is this important?
I feel the NRO document is a provable forgery. Greer touts that as convincing Wilson to seek out a alien-tech related SAP. Mitchell admitted years later, Greer upset Mitchell for FABRICATING and name dropping Mitchell as a witness when he wasn't.
I believe it's highly likely Greer misled Mitchell, and it spiraled from there.
I feel with the above, it may not be hard to conjure up a few people, with different motives, that may be enticed to make this all up and let it leak/fester.
But, I'll just leave that there.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) For clarity on why I used "UFO Debris" in the title; it's because it is a descriptor that fits. As usual, some noisy attackers feel the need to dig in to every syllable I use in order to somehow derail a story. So, without arguing all day about it, here's a thread to justify.
2) It is not in dispute that @TTSAcademy has collected numerous 'pieces' from #UAPs / #UFOs. These were part of their ADAM project, and extended into the CRADA with the Army.
According to Luis Elizondo, here is a slide of some (all?) of those objects:
3) As you can see, these are fragments, pieces, and yes, debris. The word "debris" uses the word "pieces" within its definition. Either broken off of something, or left after the destruction of something; "debris" is described as lying where they fell.
It's accepted to those who believe the Wilson/Davis notes saga, that Wilson was shown Greer's NRO document and that is truly the root of him wanting to go out and verify a alien-tech/UFO SAP?
And for clarity, per UFO Joe's blog, it just seems like that is the motivation for Wilson per Greer sending that document in advance. They then had their meeting. He then went out and discovered what he did, per the notes.
Just making sure I'm not missing something?
Adding this primarily for me in the form of a note, but in @RichDolan's presentation on YouTube, he also falls back on Greer's (& Mitchell's) claims on what motivated the meeting.
Again, Greer said it was the NRO document that set it all off. Just seeking ANYONE who can refute.
1/ When I tweeted out the article by @MicahHanks yesterday (again, kudos to my friend Micah for it!) I made a comment about the downright swiftness of the confirmation he wrote about on the side of the Pentagon. Others have wondered the same, and have asked about my experience...
1/ Federal agencies love to give the illusion they release documents to the public in complete collections.
Often, that's proven wrong.
Take the CIA #UFO documents released via #FOIA. Yes, the CIA has had UFO records online, but their archive appears to be incomplete.
2/ There are different ways to see the UFO document collection on the CIA's website, and you can see, the highest output of files is 415. The Black Vault, added 713.
They give the illusion they have it all online. But when you actually research it; it's not all there.
3/ Using the search term "UFO" yields quite a bit. However, looks can be deceiving. These are some of the "UFO" references in their search.
All unrelated and false hits. There's tons of them.
1/ Hey Tim. There is nothing nefarious or sinister here. Should you ever decide to watch it when you are not so busy - you will see I was highly complimentary to @thedebrief for moving the needle forward, and reacted to the information you, as a journalist,
As your friend, I was not going to try and pry information (that I could not use) out of you, as I wanted to not take advantage of that. Rather, I reacted like one of your readers, wearing my researcher hat, based on 24+ years of my own research
3/ and observations.
That said, my audience likes hearing analysis based on evidence they can see for themselves. If I, as a friend, could get more information beyond your article - that would be disingenuous to them by saying "I can't tell you but I know more than you."
This is a "leaked" photo of a #UAP / #UFO, according to the new site called @Debriefmedia, which is circulating within the U.S. Intelligence Community.
East Coast general location; 2018 timeframe. The source is anonymous.
More context: the UAP photo is allegedly from two classified reports created by the DOD's UAP Task Force. However, no reports have been shown or released, and ALL sources remain anonymous.
This photo is labeled a "leak" by the media site that published it as nothing is official.
The balloon theory is very prevalent out there since this was posted.
This is a solar balloon known as a "tetroon." The similarities are there, and, it's not the first time they've been mistaken for a #UFO.