Thread by @blackvaultcom

1) For clarity on why I used "UFO Debris" in the title; it's because it is a descriptor that fits. As usual, some noisy attackers feel the need to dig in to every syllable I use in order to somehow derail a story. So, without arguing all day about it, here's a thread to justify.

https://twitter.com/blackvaultcom/status/1435267093549621251

2) It is not in dispute that @TTSAcademy has collected numerous 'pieces' from #UAPs / #UFOs. These were part of their ADAM project, and extended into the CRADA with the Army.

According to Luis Elizondo, here is a slide of some (all?) of those objects:

3) As you can see, these are fragments, pieces, and yes, debris. The word "debris" uses the word "pieces" within its definition. Either broken off of something, or left after the destruction of something; "debris" is described as lying where they fell.

4) I will pick 2 of the objects to prove this is the exact definition of "debris." It's not "alleged" debris, but rather, it's debris. We can argue the stories themselves, but the fact remains, it's debris by definition, & they come from a flying object that remains unidentified.

5) First, the "Bob White" object, as profiled by a show I produced and wrote for History channel of an event from 1985, wherein on object broke off, or fell off, from a UFO.

6) The second object, the Bismuth/Magnesium Layered Metal, was said to have been a piece of a crashed UFO.

Allegedly? Of course, but descriptors are accurate for "debris."

Not "alien" as some uninformed debunkers tried to claim I said. "Unidentified."

7) Even the U.S. Army, when I asked them about testing UFO debris in 2019, never disputed they were well aware of the UFO claims surrounding what they were getting. They were interested none-the-less, and moved forward with their agreement.

8) And even in the internal Army communications I got via #FOIA; they received a request from the UAP Task Force to get the spokesperson for the UAP Task Force involved in the project, because they are the ones that deal with all UFO related questions sent to the DoD.

9) Therefore, it's ESTABLISHED that this is "UFO material/pieces/fragments/debris," but never once, anywhere, do I insinuate that all means "alien."

We can argue semantics all day long (as some have proven they will do) but if their biggest gripe is me using the phrase...

10) "UFO Debris," then I am pretty darn happy that's all they got. Because the collected evidence and documentation shows those are all descriptors used and the categorization it sits in within the crafting of official statements within the military.

11) There becomes a point when writing these types of articles, that you can't just simply state over and over and over "allegedly." The anchor links and my citations embedded within the article, link to a mountain of information which show the claims/allegations/stories/facts.

12) I welcome anyone to edit their own blogs/articles/epics/books/masterpieces how they wish. However, I work hard to source all material, and feel with the above, the headline is more than justified.

If whomever doesn't feel the same way -- I can offer their money back.