A teasing thread (1/25) on our new report that benchmarks energy scenarios and distils key indicators and insights for the #cleanenergy transition. Jointly produced by @EU_ScienceHub and @IRENA. Enjoy! ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/science… Image
(2/25) This figure presents the process for comparing long-term energy scenarios and the different steps that can be improved. Important steps are to identify and communicate key insights for the clean energy transition. Image
(3/25) The core of the benchmarking was to screen each study on reported indicators and assumptions. The aim? To find how we can improve scenario comparisons. Image
(4/25) 24 indicators have been carefully screened.
(5/25) We conclude that studies could provide more information on 10 specific indicators. Examples are bioenergy feedstock or the sources from which carbon dioxide is captured and on how much is reused or sequestered. Image
(6/25) Some critical assumptions that need further attention include the speed at which sectors can transition and the availability of climate-neutral fuels. Image
(7/25) We also screened each study on the insights they provide for the clean energy transition. Remember, one of the important steps. Image
(8/25) This resulted in a very useful and compact list on similarities on what is deemed required for the energy transition. Image
(9/25) as well as a compact list of differences between what the scenarios stated as being required
for the energy transition Image
(10/25) But the best part to read is the synthesis of the discussions at our IRENA-JRC LTES workshop on expert insights. It reads like a magazine and we are very grateful that all experts have shared their insights with us. irena.org/events/2020/Se… Image
(11/25) William Zimmern from bp spoke about consistent breakthrough technologies in transition scenarios. @bp_plc #bpNetZero Image
(12/25) Christoph Jugel from the German Energy Agency (dena) spoke about setting intermediate goals for an integrated energy transition. @dena_news Image
(13/25) Seb Henbest from BloombergNEF (BNEF) spoke about trade-offs, sector growth and the role of consumers @SebHenbest Image
(14/25) Sheila Samsatli from the University of Bath concludes that similarities and differences across scenarios provide a range for technological deployment @UniofBath Image
(15/25) Trieu Mai from National Renewable Energy
Laboratory (@NREL) spoke about how uncertainty on breakthroughs can cause differences across scenarios Image
(16/25) Anahi Molar-Cruz from the Technical University of Munich (TUM) spoke about the benefits of integrated modelling of sectors and regions Image
(17/25) Christof van Agt from the International Energy Forum (IEF) spoke about the aim of scenario comparison studies and improving comparability @AgtChristof Image
(18/25) James Newcomb from the Rocky Mountain Institute (@RockyMtnInst) spoke about shifting the attention to the demand side, consumer behaviour and the ecosystem Image
(19/25) Jürgen Kropp from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) recommended assessing trade-offs rather than absolute values in scenario comparison @J_P_Kropp Image
(20/25) Edward Byers from the Institute for International Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) spoke about statistical considerations and reviewing the baseline assumptions @EdwardByers Image
(21/25) Daniel Raimi from Resources for the Future (RFF) advocates clear communication with scenario users, not only with scenario developers @DanielRaimi Image
(22/25) Andries Hof from the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL) stated that political choices are the largest drivers for uncertainty in energy scenarios @Leefomgeving Image
(23/25) Anastasia Belostotskaya from the World Energy Council (WEC) spoke about moving beyond scenario reports to active use and impact @Belostotskaya Image
(24/25) I spoke about scenarios reaching net-zero emissions in the EU energy system by 2050. Official #EUGreenDeal scenarios are now also visualised in our new energy scenarios tool: visitors-centre.jrc.ec.europa.eu/en/media/tools…
(25/25) Asami Miketa from the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) spoke about IRENA's long-term energy scenarios (#LTES) Network.
THANKS ! Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Wouter Nijs

Wouter Nijs Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WouterNijs

1 Jun 20
Thread (1/9) Proud of our new report! So many messages distilled for you, by our team @EU_ScienceHub and from a polyphony of #EnergyScenarios. Let the deeper understanding of it mature now. Enjoy its taste !
ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publica… #EUGreenDeal
(2/9) Scenarios achieving 50-56% CO2 reduction by 2030 see total #coal use reduce by 70%, #oil by 25-50% and #naturalgas by up to 25%. The use of total #biomass ranges from limited growth to an increase of up to 60%. All compared to 2017.
(3/9) The growth of #wind power generation varies between a factor of 1.5 and 3.5 and the growth of #solar power between 1.5 and 4.5. Between 2017 and 2030.
#Hydrogen and #CCUS emerges in some but not all scenarios.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(