This weekend, 75 members of the public from across the UK gather online to begin examining the question ‘How should the UK’s democracy work?’
In this blogpost, project lead @alanjrenwick sets out what the Assembly will do, & why it deserves attention bit.ly/3tMPOhS
2/
Running for six weekends, the Citizens’ Assembly on Democracy in the UK is part of the Constitution Unit’s wider research project, Democracy in the UK after Brexit, funded by @ESRC and delivered in partnership with public participation charity @involveUK
3/
The Assembly will discuss:
How should democracy in the UK work?
What principles should underpin the system?
How should power be distributed between parliament, government, courts and the public?
What behaviours do people expect from politicians & fellow citizens?
4/ Why do these questions need attention?
Democracy works best when public confidence in its functioning is high. Yet confidence in the democratic system in the UK is low
But there has been little attempt to dig deeper into people’s thinking. The project will help fill that gap
5/
More specifically, Dr Renwick argues, recent events have put the democratic system under considerable strain.
The Brexit process highlighted differences of view on the proper balance of power between parliament and government, and the roles of the courts and referendums.
6/
In addition, COVID-19 brought into question how far government should be able to decide matters without direct parliamentary involvement.
The insights of the Assembly will illuminate such ongoing debates.
7/ Why a citizens’ assembly?
Many people do not have the opportunity to carefully consider how our democracy should work.
So, there’s a danger that we only know the public’s top-of-the head responses to pollster questions, which may not be reflective of how people really think.
8/
A citizens’ assembly can overcome that difficulty: it can show us what a cross-section of the population at large think once they have learnt about and considered the issues in more depth. At least on the surface, that can only aid informed policymaking.
9/
The Assembly members are highly representative of the UK population in terms of age, gender, ethnicity, education, disability status, where they live in the UK, vote (or non-vote) in the 2016 Brexit referendum & 2019 general election, and views on citizens’ role in democracy
In short, the citizens’ assembly process will enable more informed and considered public discussion, yielding recommendations on the future shape of democracy that will deserve close attention from policymakers and wider publics alike.
12/
Want to find out more?
This webpage provides more information on the scope of the Assembly, and briefings and speaker presentations will also be published here following each weekend: bit.ly/3lvPjF9
The Dissolution & Calling of Parliament Bill returns to the Commons next week
In our blog, Unit Director Meg Russell, @Prof_Phillipson & @PetraSchleiter analyse its key flaws & propose a solution that keeps parliament at the heart of decision-making
The bill seeks to repeal the Fixed-term Parliaments Act & revive the prerogative power of dissolution – allowing the PM to ask the monarch for dissolution without parliamentary approval.
First, the bill seeks to exclude the courts, through its ‘ouster clause’. But its approach risks legal uncertainty – it’s unclear whether a statute can revive a prerogative power. Such legal uncertainty can only be resolved in court: ironically, risking drawing the courts in
Today we publish a working paper on the findings of a large-scale public consultation on the prospect of referendums on Northern Ireland’s constitutional status, authored by @alanjrenwick, @NadiaDobryanska, @ConorKellyLDN and @chhkincaid.
The six-week consultation was initiated by the Working Group on Unification Referendums on the Island of Ireland in the summer of 2020 and received
1,377 responses.
Of those who responded 62% were nationalists, 17.8% were unionists, and 18.9% identified with neither community.
The paper concludes that Irish nationalists, for understandable reasons, are much more willing to participate in discussions on such referendums than are unionists.
Linda Colley kicks off the webinar by explaining how her book differs from other studies of constitutional history: it is a global study rather than a study on a single constitution, & it explains the emergence of written constitutions as a product of war, rather than revolution.
The study looks at the history of constitutions from the 1750s to the modern day. Prof Colley argues that often war preceded political collapse. Post-conflict governments then set out new written constitutions to legitimise their power, both at home and internationally.
In this blog post, book authors Stephan Haggard & Robert R. Kaufman summarise their comparative research on democratic ‘backsliding’, describing how, & why, countries slip away from democracy, and asking, could democratic backsliding occur in the UK? bit.ly/2TarYOR
2/
The authors’ work identifies at least 16 countries - some of which were not so long ago viewed as stable and robust democracies – most notably the United States - which have recently experienced democratic backsliding, to varying degrees.
3/
Backsliding is a process of democratic reversion. Unlike a coup d'état, it is more insidious, with illiberal leaders rising to power within a democratic framework, attacking core features of democracy from within.
A year ago today, the House of Commons returned to business transformed by COVID-19. This briefing (summarised in a letter to @thetimes) highlights five ways in which the government’s approach to the House of Commons has eroded parliamentary control
👇👇
3/
1.The use of emergency legislation.
The Coronavirus Act 2020 relaxed the normal safeguards on official action. But it passed the Commons in just one day, and despite requiring six-monthly renewal, has been debated by MPs for just five hours in the past year.
A new report by Unit Director Meg Russell and @danielgover argues that the House of Commons should govern its own time – and makes proposals for wresting back that control from the government. @UKandEU
There have been numerous recent controversies over control of the Commons’ time
Think of Brexit headlines about MPs ‘seizing the agenda’, or clashes over procedure during the pandemic. At the heart of both lie questions about who decides what the Commons discusses & when⏱️
2/8
At present, the government has significant agenda control 💪. And it has monopoly control over prorogation & recall, which determine whether the Commons can sit at all.
Our new report explores this system, its problems, and what can be done.