Time for part 4️⃣ of my comparative physiology series:
Case 1
You are called about an elevated blood alcohol level in an inpatient.
"That’s impossible," the tech says, "he’s been admitted to the ICU for a month!"
It’s totally normal, you say, because the sample came from a __
1/
Answer: 🐠
Under anoxic conditions vertebrates produce lactate. This accumulates causing acidosis.
Goldfish & carp are unique b/c they can convert lactate to ethanol, which diffuses out of their gills into the water. They can survive w/o O2 for months! nature.com/articles/s4159… 2/
Other answers
Bats & primates are good ethanol metabolizers by necessity due to a diet that includes fermented fruit.
The Pen Tailed Shrew is an especially fast ethanol metabolizer: adjusted for size, it consumes the equivalent of 9 beers/day! 3/
In contrast to the shrew, the 🐘 is a very slow EtOH metabolizer due to a loss of the AHD7 gene. Despite their size, elephants can get drunk easily if they eat fermented fruit…which they do.
Clinical 🥡:
Rarely, humans produce EtOH too. Unlike goldfish (who do it endogenously) in humans it occurs due to abnormalities in gut flora, which ferment sugars into EtOH. This is called auto-brewery syndrome (ABS) & cam occur after a high carb meal. bmjopengastro.bmj.com/content/6/1/e0…
5/
Case 2:
Which of these patients would be *MOST* likely to need to visit an oncologist:
6/
Answer: Tazmanian Devil
Devils face extinction from a transmissible cancer called Devil Facial Tumor Disease (DFTD)
When one Devil bites another (as they often do) it can transmit tumor cells directly to the other animal
In 2 decades (1995-2015) over 95% of Devils died of DFTD 7/
A transmissible cancer means that cells from one organism *directly* invade another.
DFTD occurs b/c the Devil's immune systems can’t recognize the tumor as foreign: limited MHC diversity/expression, constricted T-cell repertoire, & PDL1 upregulation. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30225648/
8/
Clinical 🥡:
Normally the our immune system prevents non-viral clonally transmissible cancers. Normally.
There is a case of a surgeon who cut himself while resecting a sarcoma & went to to develop a genetically identical sarcoma in his finger later. nejm.org/doi/full/10.10… 9/
Case 3:
Which of these patients would be *LEAST* likely to need to visit an oncologist:
10/
Answer: 🐀Naked Mole rat
The naked mole rat is remarkable: a cold blooded mammal that is insensitive to cutaneous pain & can live in as little as 5% FiO2 or as much as 80% CO2.
It’s also the longest lived rodent & it probably *NEVER* develops cancer! nature.com/articles/s4156… 11/
We could (& maybe should) have a whole tweetorial about the naked mole rat, but on the topic of cancer resistance & longevity, there are several mechanisms: a unique ECM matrix & contact inhibition pathways, highly accurate ribosomes, & a low metabolic rate. 12/
Other answers:
Elephants & bowhead whales are both exceptionally long-lived and highly cancer resistant.
The elephant (lifespan up to 70 years) has 19 additional copies of the p53 tumor suppressor, which makes it highly cancer resistant. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26447779/ 13/
The bowhead whale (lifespan >200 years) has enhanced DNA repair mechanisms & upregulates uncoupling protein 1. It likely has novel mechanisms of longevity and cancer resistance that we still don’t comprehend.
ASIDE: There may be bowhead whales that are older than America! 14/
in 1975 Richard Peto observed that despite the fact that humans have 1000x more cells than mice and live 30x longer our risk of cancer is lower. Despite more cells dividing more often, our cancer risk is somehow lower. This is called “Peto’s paradox” pnas.org/content/116/6/… 15/
Clinical 🥡:
There are advantages to having 40 alleles of p53 like elephants do.
Recall that in humans, who have just two copies of p53 (one each from mom & dad), the germline loss of one allele (in Li-Fraumeni syndrome) increases the lifetime risk of cancer to almost 100%.
16/
Case 4:
You are called by respiratory therapy about some very weird ventilator settings you ordered:
Tv 55 ml/kg PBW, RR 2, PEEP +5, FiO2 30%
(Yes that really says 55 ml/kg not 5.5!)
You say, it’s OK because the patient is a ___.
17/
Answer: Dolphin 🐬
Almost every animal has a tidal volume of ~6 cc/kg PBW.
*The exception is cetaceans (dolphins, whales, porpoises) who need to take much larger breaths more infrequently in order to dive underwater. 18/
But *why* is tidal volume constant across (almost) all species?
VO2 increases with size, so alveolar surface area must increase too. Lungs remain about 1% of body weight.
Pressure volume curves are similar across species (the exception is the cat; 🐈s have very stiff lungs!) 19/
This detail about cat lungs is a bit ironic since this figure (from a 1929 paper by Kurt von Neergaard) is *ALWAYS* used to demonstrate the effect of surfactant on lung compliance, even if it was obtained from “Cat #27”.
H/T to @derangedphys for this. derangedphysiology.com/main/cicm-prim… 20/
Also, if you want to learn a lot more about comparative lung physiology I *HIGHLY* recommend this excellent page from McGill. All the graphs, allometric equations, and lung physiology you could possibly want! medicine.mcgill.ca/physio/resp-we…
21/
Clinical🥡:
That fact that every animal has a TV of 6 cc/kg PBW is a great physiologic basis for “low” tidal volume ventilation, as we use in lung protective ventilation (LPV)
I say “low” b/c a TV of 6 ml/kg PBW really ought to be considered "normal"! pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24714700/ 22/
I hope you’ve enjoyed part 4️⃣ of my comparative physiology series.
Thanks to those who suggested topics, the years I spent doing cancer research, & my google news alert about naked mole rats.
If you want more, you can find links to parts 1-3 below:
23/23
One bizarre argument I keep seeing is that “if ivermectin was ‘approved for COVID’ the vaccines would lose their EUA status because there would be an alternative treatment.”
This is untrue (and a particularly stupid argument) for several reasons.
A short thread. 1/
First of all there *ARE* FDA approved, NIH recommended therapies that reduce COVID mortality & are currently in widespread use:
- dexamethasone
- tocalizumab
- baricitinib
If the mere existence of an “alternative therapy” instantly voided an EUA it would have already happened 2/
Second, one of the vaccines (the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine) *ALREADY HAS* full FDA approval.
The full approval of the Pfizer vaccine on 8/23 means that Pfizer doesn’t have an EUA anymore. It also didn’t magically invalidate the other 2 vaccine EUAs. 3/ fda.gov/news-events/pr…
The last few weeks have been tough. For those in need of a light hearted thread, here’s a brand new 3rd #tweetorial in my extremes of #physiology series. What can the animal kingdom teach us about our physiology?
Buckle up for some fun animal pulmonary facts 🫁!
1/
CASE 1:
You are performing a bronchoscopy. Upon reaching the main carina instead of the usual TWO airways (right & left mainstem bronchi) you see THREE.
Your assistant says “Whoa! That’s weird”
You say no it’s totally normal because the patient is a:
2/
Answer: 🐖
In pigs, the RUL lobe bronchus originates from the supra-carinal trachea (e.g. before the R & L mainstream branches). The view from the trachea looks like this (see the tracheal bronchus on the right).
The #COVBARRIER RCT now published @LancetRespirMed & it looks like we have a new COVID tx: Baricitinib
-n=1525 hospitalized COVID pts not on IMV
-lower mortality w/ Bari compared to placebo (10% vs 15%) (NNT = 20) & larger benefit in sicker pts!
-bit.ly/3yDmJ9r 1/
COV-BARRIER was a 101 site, double blind RCT performed in 11 countries.
It enrolled hospitalized COVID patients who were hypoxemic (but not on IMV) and had evidence of inflammation.
It had many exclusion criteria including monoclonals, immunesuppression. This is a🔑 point. 2/
The intervention was 4mg of baricitinib, an orally available JAK1/2 inhibitor, dosed once daily for 14 days or until hospital d/c. (It can be crushed and given by FT).
Bari is an FDA approved treatment for RA. It costs ~$50-75 per pill (thus a 14 day course is ~$700-1000). 3/
As the evidence supporting ivermectin as COVID treatment collapses, you might expect *less* certainty from the drug’s evangelists.
Instead they’ve doubled down on ivermectin.
It’s worth reading this passage from Festinger’s Theory of Cognitive Dissonance to understand: 1/
For context, Festinger & colleagues joined a cult (“The Seekers”) who believed the world would end on December 21, 1954 & that true believers would be rescued by a UFO
The researchers wondered how the Seekers would react to “disconfirmation” when this didn’t happen.
2/
As the date approached, the researchers watched many “Seekers” take irrevocable steps because of their belief: they quit their jobs, severed ties to loved ones, & disposed of possessions.
What would happen when their beliefs were discredited? 3/
First off, I’m sorry that you got COVID and I’m glad you recovered. I respect that you have the integrity to admit that ivermectin wasn’t able to prevent your illness. 1/
I’ve read the same studies & I disagree with your assessment of IVM; A few small methodologically flawed studies are just not compelling in light of negative results from large high quality RCTs. @cochranecollab & many experts have likewise concluded that IVM is ineffective
2/
What I find alarming is your failure to use your platform to advocate for vaccination. You claim to follow the evidence. Do you really think there is more evidence for daily mouthwash use than for vaccination to prevent COVID?
A few weeks ago I tweeted about the rising cases due to #DeltaVariant. I was surprised by the number of people who replied saying essentially “they did this to themselves.”
A short 🧵about why we ought to look at this situation differently 1/
Seeing the #DeltaSurge among the un-vaccinated, I'm reminded of an adage I learned in my residency: “The trauma ICU is filled by man’s cruelty to man & the medical ICU by man’s cruelty to himself.”
2/
It’s true.
Without tobacco, alcohol, & opioids, there would be less COPD, cirrhosis, & endocarditis.
Without dietary indiscretions & "noncompliance”, we would not see fewer complications of DM or exacerbations of chronic illness.