Overall, the expansion would fund about 750,000 vouchers after a five-year phase in & help 1.7 million people live in safe, stable #housing. Here are our estimates of who that would help in every state: cbpp.org/research/housi…
As they move toward finalizing legislation, policymakers should recognize the impact any reduction in the voucher funding would have.
For each $5 billion reduction, 112,000 people would who have received a voucher once the expansion is phased in would be left unassisted, increasing the chance they will experience homelessness, eviction, & other severe hardship.
That would include 44,200 children, 22,100 people with disabilities, and 12,100 seniors. Some 79,100 of those denied assistance would be people of color.
We know #housing vouchers are highly effective at reducing #homelessness, overcrowding, & housing instability, & these vouchers would be tightly targeted on those who need them most. cbpp.org/housing-choice…
About 205,000 #housing vouchers would be set aside for people experiencing or at risk of #homelessness & survivors of domestic violence & trafficking, & the rest would go to others with incomes around or below the #poverty line
Vouchers would also reduce racial disparities in #housing opportunity & give people more choice about where they live – and #BuildBackBetter also includes funds for services to help families rent in a neighborhood they choose. cbpp.org/moving-with-vo…
Can rental markets absorb the new vouchers? Yes! #Housing agencies have put virtually all of their voucher funds to use in recent years, even in tight markets. cbpp.org/blog/rental-ma…
And many of the new vouchers would go to people who have homes but pay very high share shares of their income for rent. cbpp.org/many-vouchers-…
Congress should make retaining #BuildBackBetter’s voucher expansion a top priority, along with other investments that help those most in need afford homes: public #housing renovations, Housing Trust Fund, tribal housing, & other rental assistance like Section 8 PBRA.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My🧵of the day: An important piece of House Financial Services’ #BuildBackBetter is funding for tribal housing. Tribal nations wouldn't be eligible for many of the other major investments in this bill, so keeping the $2B for these programs is critical for #EquitableRecovery
Inadequate funding for tribal #housing programs has meant American Indians & Alaska Natives living in tribal areas cannot access the housing supports they need. This funding would help decrease overcrowding, repair older homes, & improve climate resiliency.
Tribal #housing programs allow tribal nations to build & rehabilitate affordable housing, provide rental assistance to low-income American Indians & Alaska Natives living on tribal lands, & other housing & community development projects that meet a tribe’s unique needs.
Thread: Millions of renters at risk of eviction are grappling with the news that they are no longer protected by the @CDCgov#EvictionMoratorium. The @USSupremeCourt decision last night makes clear that Congress must act before another nation-wide eviction ban can be issued.
Congress should act now, and states & localities can also take steps to prevent & delay #evictions.
Federal lawmakers can make sure this preventable crisis never happens again by sharply expanding #housing vouchers in upcoming recovery legislation. cbpp.org/research/housi…
Here is a link to a tool for finding rental assistance in your community. And below are some steps state and local officials should take. consumerfinance.gov/coronavirus/mo…
USICH released its new federal strategic plan to prevent and end homelessness, a requirement under the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act. Here are my thoughts.
This plan deviates in significant and disappointing ways from USICH’s first two plans: Opening Doors released in the Obama Administration, and Home, Together released under the leadership of Obama appointee @m_j_doherty .
It reflects a typical Trump Administration approach: blame previous admins, misrepresent info, contradict their own policy, cite little evidence. It fails to provide concrete direction for communities struggling with increasing unsheltered homelessness & the effects of COVID-19.