@CER_Grant@hilarybennmp@lisanandy@JennyChapman So @lisanandy says not realistic that labour campaigns on rejoining customs union and single market...and @JennyChapman wants to rebuild the relationship 'bit by bit'...but doesn't want to engage with the 'ratchet' that leads to a 'Norway for Now' relationship./2
And as all three dodge specifics, the discussion collapses into an appeal for "good will and flexibility" from the EU. /3
@CER_Grant@hilarybennmp@lisanandy@JennyChapman I get the political sensitivities here, but it is eerily reminiscent of the 2017 discussion and the abject failure to understand the European Commission and how it works....and the trade offs that will be involved. /4
@CER_Grant@hilarybennmp@lisanandy@JennyChapman On the upside, as @JennyChapman observes, when the time comes -- if it ever comes -- the "toxicity" around that 2017 conversation will have dissipated. The electorate may be more receptive to trade offs needed for vet deal, mobility chapter...and the benefits they'll bring./5
And then @lisanandy ends with a pledge that the conversation will be honest -- "but never again can we be in a situation where we make those choices without involving the public in those decisions" -- because last time the Party failed to level with its public. ENDS
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@FT It's easy to dismiss @BorisJohnson but do so at your peril...he's a political alchemist and opportunist, who wins 80 seat majorities when no-one thought that was possible.
But the first two years of his premiership have been sucked up by #Brexit and #Covid-19. But what now?/2
@FT@BorisJohnson Recall the dreadful "levelling up" speech last July that everyone trashed on left and right that, as one senior Tory tells me and @GeorgeWParker was delivered because “the PM just wanted to say something — anything — about levelling up” /3
My latest #brexit briefing…on the risks of doing away with EU law via @FT.
While everyone scoffed about pint pots and imperial measures last week, @DavidGHFrost was making a potentially big move that is worrying legal experts. Stay with me/1 on.ft.com/3EKQCsH
@FT@DavidGHFrost So what's this all about? Well, you'll remember that list of 'freedom' dividends that Frost announced as a follow up to the TIGGR report on deregulation...some trivial stuff, some more substantive bits, but easy fodder for the pro- #Brexit press /2
@FT@DavidGHFrost But Frost's statement to the Lords contained a potentially much more far-reaching and consequential strand that relates to so-called "retained" EU law...and that's the part that's got lawyers like @CSBarnard24@SirJJQC@GeorgePeretzQC twitching. /3
🚨🚨🇬🇧🇪🇺🎓🚌🇫🇷🇩🇪🇮🇹🎓🚌🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨IT’S OUT: my latest #brexit briefing.
School trips to Britain put at risk by EU passport rule change via @FT tl;dr…stopping EU kids using ID cards will help erode U.K. bond with EU warn travel groups. 😢
@FT This is one of those stories where the impact of #Brexit is not quantified in £s or euros...but in the gradual building up of barriers between the EU and the UK.
In this case, stopping use of EU ID cards for travel into UK...which will hit EU school trips /2
@FT It might not seem like a big deal, requiring everyone has a passport to enter UK, but in practice companies that organise school trips -- one of the cheapest and earlies forms of cultural exposure -- say it will hit them hard/3
This relates to Article 22 of GDPR, the EU data protection regulation which guarantees a human review of automated decision or profiling -- for EG online loan award a loan, or a recruitment aptitude test using algorithms to filter candidates. /2
NEW: UK is about to extend "grace periods" for NI Protocol that has caused so much difficulty since #Brexit -- EU side will not object -- so that talks on UK Command Paper can continue....BUT (to be clear) two sides still miles apart /1
So, take Lord Frost @DavidGHFrost speech at weekend (worth reading)... he repeats that “solutions which involve ‘flexibilities’ within the current rules won’t work for us”. But that is exactly where the EU is.../2
“We don’t really see the case for renegotiating it [the protocol] so soon, we think most of the solutions can be found within the existing agreement.” /3
🚨🚨🇬🇧🇬🇧🇪🇺🇪🇺🇬🇧🇬🇧🚨🚨UK proposal to rewrite section of Brexit deal wins lawyers’ backing - my latest via @FT with @PickardJE. It’s about Article 10, and why it’s arguably obsolete. Heralds battles to come.
@FT@PickardJE This is an interesting intervention from @GeorgePeretzQC and @jamesrwebber
that runs rule over the demand from @DavidGHFrost
last july that Article 10 of the NI Protocol should be replaced/re-written. Their full text is here..but tl;dr /2
@FT@PickardJE@GeorgePeretzQC@jamesrwebber@DavidGHFrost Article 10 is that part of the Protocol on state aid which means that UK Govt subsidy decisions that could impact on NI goods trade need to be referred to Brussels...even if those decision are primarily for UK economy. Understandably Brexiters hate it. /3