The share of English in global GDP is steadily falling, just as the share of Asia is rising. This is inconvenient for bygone powers like UK, whose global status is predicated on the use of English. Hence English is being pushed in India, directing its GDP into the Anglo-economy.
The argument for using English would have made some sense in the era when USA was the undoubted motor of global economy. This was the case for most of 20th century.
Now that era is finished. USA still remains an important power, but it will also diversify its language portfolio.
For example, USA needs to be magnet of the entire Western Hemisphere, both the northern and southern America. It cannot cede any ground there to China. So the right strategy for USA is to promote the use of Spanish.
The UK is a hopeless gone case as a power. It is a dead weight.
The only people who take UK (and its Anglo prestige) seriously are the non-decolonized Anglophone elite of its former colonies.
India needs to push these morons out of the corridors of power, otherwise it will also sink along with the UK. India doesn’t need English for its rise.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The trouble is that a lot of these people have never interacted with people who completed their professional education in their own mother tongues (whether French, German, Chinese, Korean or whatever) but still picked up good expression in English.
The most ridiculous situation is when these counter-examples to their argument stare right at their face, and they think they somehow are bolstering their argument instead of weakening it.
Fact: All these German people studied in German medium.
I teach in Germany and in German medium. Most of my students are excellent English speakers, I would say better than 90% of Indians *who studied in English medium*. I give the option for making course presentations in English, but almost always they choose to present in German.
Sheer disaster. The effects of such decisions will appear in 20 years time.
I am disappointed with BJP.
Defeatists are arguing that English is already too deeply encroached to make any change in course. Similar arguments were also made for the continuation of the colonial rule.
I was hopeful of some changes initiated by the BJP in the NEP 2020. But unfortunately, BJP is proving itself to be a party with no commitment, no long term vision, and no awareness of the civilizational threats to India. It is another opportunistic element in a defeated nation.
When the British inflicted famines on India and created their infamous concentration camps of mass deaths (supposedly for improving the health and nutrition of the Indians), many desperate Indians emigrated as indentured labour, signing agreements of bondage on their own will.
It’s by no means the job of the Indian government to explain the intricacies of the Śāstrārtha. They don’t have the competence or training. *I* don’t have them either. The various Sampradāyas which maintain temples/Tīrthas have that competence. Why is it not their job to explain?
Why is the Indian government is in this role of maintaining Hindu temples?
Why? Because the British had that role. First the East Indian Company, and then the head of the Anglican Church (British Queen) was managing Hindu temples (and eating their revenue). Now the Indian state!
This is the stupidity of interpreting Hindu customs through the lens of Christianity. Neither Swayamvara nor Kanyādāna are about the woman becoming the property of the husband. Copy+paste criticisms of marriage from the west, because our liberals have no brains of their own.
In Vedic tradition, a man becomes eligible to be a Yajamāna (the one who officiates a Yajña) only after he is married. And the Yajña must be performed by the Pati (man head) and Patnī (woman head) together. They are partners of Karma (action) in Dharma. The woman is not property.
The educated dumbass would say Kanyādāna means the woman is being treated as property and given to the custodianship of the man. This is ridiculous. If she is property, why does she have Adhikāra (rights, authorities) of her own? Why does she chant the Mantras (which she must)?
త్రివిమరూపాలను గ్రహించేటప్పుడు క్లిష్ట రూపానుసంధాన పరిణామాలను కాలసంయతంగా పరిగణించడం కష్టమైన పని. అభినేతల వస్త్రధారణ వలననూ, చేతులతో వస్తువులను పరస్పృశించు తీరుల వలననూ సరైన రూపానుసంధాన అమరికను త్రివిమరూపానికి అన్వయించడం కష్టమవుతుంది. ఈ కార్యాన్ని ఔచిత్యంగా రూపవిభాజనంచే నెరవేర్చారు.
గూగుల్ పరిశోధకుల నూతనావిష్కరణ ఈ వ్యోమగ్రాహకగోళం. గత 20 సంవత్సరాలుగా పరిశోధనాధిపతి పాల్ డెబెవెక్ గారు పునరుద్ధీపనీయాభినయగ్రహణంపై పనిచేస్తున్నారు. దీపరంగస్థలి (లైట్ స్టేజ్) అను గ్రాహకగోళంతో చలనచిత్రపాత్రధారుల అభినయాలను అభిలేఖించవచ్చు. ఇదాయనకు సాంకేతిక ఆస్కార్ పురస్కారం తెచ్చింది.
ఒస్మానియా విశ్వవిద్యాలయంలో పాత్రికేయవిద్యావిభాగంలో ఆచార్యపదవి వహిస్తున్న కె.నాగేశ్వర్ మాతృభాషామాధ్యమంలో విద్యాబోధనపై తమ అభిప్రాయాలు వెల్లడించారు. క్రింది ట్వీటుమాలికలో వాటిపై నా విమర్శను వ్యక్తపరుస్తాను. @K_Nageshwar
తెలుగుభాషాభిమానులకు ఈ చర్చ విషయప్రకాశకంగా అవుతుందని నా అభిలాష.
మొదటగా నాగేశ్వర్ గారి వాదనలను తృణప్రాయాలని తీసివేయలేము. ఆయన అభిమతాలు నాకు విరుద్ధంగా ఉండవచ్చు. కానీ ఆయన విజ్ఞుడని తెలుగుభాషాభిమాని అని ఒప్పకతప్పదు. విషయపరిజ్ఞానమున్న వారు గౌరవప్రదంగా సంవాదించినప్పుడే సామాన్యప్రజానీకానికి విషయవివేచనం కలుగుతుంది. పేర్లుపెట్టి కొట్టిపారేస్తే జరగదు.
నాగేశ్వర్ గారి ప్రకారం 1) తెలుగు మాధ్యమాన శాస్త్రవైజ్ఞానికవిషయాలను చదవడం వలన మెరుగేమీ లేదు. ప్రస్తుతం అనేకులు ఆంగ్లమాధ్యమంలో చదువుకుంటున్నారు, పైగా ప్రపంచవిపణికి చేరువౌతున్నారు. 2) ఆంగ్లమాధ్యమంలో కూడా తెలుగుసాహిత్యంపై రుచిని, సాధనను కల్పించవచ్చు.