#SupremeCourt delivers order on a plea seeking implementation of SC order directing NDMA to frame guidelines for payment of ex gratia compensation for COVID19 deaths
Justice MR Shah: next kin of the deceased shall be paid an amount of Rs 50,000 and it will be over and above the amounts paid by centre and state under various benevolent schemes.
Justice MR Shah: The payment will be from state disaster relief funds. Full details of the beneficiary should be published in print media. Such amount will be disbursed within 30 days of submitting application and cause of death being certified as of COVID19
Justice Shah: No state shall deny the Rs 50,000 benefit on the ground that cause of death in death certificate is not COVID19. The district authorities to take remedial steps to have the cause of death corrected. District level committee details to be published in print media
Justice Shah: the ex gratia assistance shall continue to be provided for deaths that continue to occur post the date of judgment.
Justice Shah: COVID19 case for purposes of compensation is the one in which victims were diagnosed with covid rt PCR positive in an outside clinic or in patient facility. This test to be within 30 days of the date of death.
SC: covid cases not resolved and where person dies in home or hospital will also be covid death, if family member satisfies the authority of cause of death as covid then no state shall deny benefit of 50,000 on the ground that cause of death is not covid in the death certificate
Justice Shah: grievance redressal committee can examine medical records of deceased patient and take a call within 30 days and order the compensation. such committee will have the power to call for records from the hospitals.
Justice Shah: in case of death certificates already issued and if family members are aggrieved by cause of death mentioned in the certificate, it will be open to approach the committee and submit relevant documents and seek a modification of such certificate.
Justice Shah: NDMA and Ministry of Health are directed to issue guidelines to have the above directions implemented by the state.
Justice Shah: In terms of the above the plea stands disposed off.
Justice Chandrachud: it is very easy to criticize the court or government without being on the hot seat. . Is it fit we conduct a legal post mortem of the issue now here?
Justice Chandrachud: You must invoke remedies under CrPC before seeking CBI probe and this is not a case for commission of enquiry. article 32 is to be the last resort..lets do something positive for the society...
Hearing before Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate RM Nerlikar.
Adv Satish Maneshinde to appear for Khan.
Adv Sartaj Shaikh to appear for Dhamecha and Merchant.
Special Public Prosecutor Advait Sethna to appear for NCB.
#SupremeCourt to hear a plea by Real estate company, @Supertechltd seeking modification of the top court's August 31 judgment by which the Court had directed the demolition of the 40-storey twin tower building of Supertech's Emerald Court project at Noida @noida_authority
Justice Chandrachud: how can this be maitainable?
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: we are seeking to implement the order.
SC: You want to keep T16 and demolish T17, this is not maintainable. you cant file an MA when a judgment has been delivered
Justice BV Nagarathna: its like seeking implementation of the verdict on your own terms
Justice Chandrachud: its just not on marginal distance. its on other aspects
Rohatgi: one is distance and one is the green area issue
Adv Tanveer Ahmed Mir rebuts Prosecution's arguments against #SharjeelImam who has sought bail in a case connected to #DelhiRiots before Delhi Court. "Sole indictment on the speech. Incumbent duty upon all of us to look at the speech... If it incident violence"
Mir argues in a case of #Sedition against Imam. On #NRC, Mir argues ultimately his client's speech talks about advocating of a policy like... "In a university if we don't debate public policies, where do we debate?" #sharjeel_imam#CAA_NRC#DelhiRiots
Mir: This is a criminal court. We don't go by inferences. I am not denying my speech. For the speech to fall under #Sedition... My friend can't have discretion to add his own thoughts and inferences. #sharjeel_imam#DelhiRiots
#SupremeCourt hears plea by West Bengal govt for a stay on investigation in post poll violence cases claiming that #CBI has not received pre-requisite permission from state.
#SupremeCourt to hear a PIL seeking direction to the Centre to frame model pacts for builders and agent buyers to protect customers and bring in transparency in the realty sector in tune with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) Act, 2016 @AshwiniUpadhyay
Sr Adv Vikas Singh: It's a PIL
Justice Chandrachud: the next plea is a claim against a developer we will not entertain this. But regarding this plea under what provision and how will this model agreement be framed
Singh: it should be by the centre for states to follow
Singh: There is no mandatory language. states may or may not frame the model BBA. There should be a model to be adopted by the states
Justice Chandrachud: is there a provision allowing Centre to frame this model BBA