#SupremeCourt delivers order on a plea seeking implementation of SC order directing NDMA to frame guidelines for payment of ex gratia compensation for COVID19 deaths
Justice MR Shah: next kin of the deceased shall be paid an amount of Rs 50,000 and it will be over and above the amounts paid by centre and state under various benevolent schemes.
Justice MR Shah: The payment will be from state disaster relief funds. Full details of the beneficiary should be published in print media. Such amount will be disbursed within 30 days of submitting application and cause of death being certified as of COVID19
Justice Shah: No state shall deny the Rs 50,000 benefit on the ground that cause of death in death certificate is not COVID19. The district authorities to take remedial steps to have the cause of death corrected. District level committee details to be published in print media
Justice Shah: the ex gratia assistance shall continue to be provided for deaths that continue to occur post the date of judgment.
Justice Shah: COVID19 case for purposes of compensation is the one in which victims were diagnosed with covid rt PCR positive in an outside clinic or in patient facility. This test to be within 30 days of the date of death.
SC: covid cases not resolved and where person dies in home or hospital will also be covid death, if family member satisfies the authority of cause of death as covid then no state shall deny benefit of 50,000 on the ground that cause of death is not covid in the death certificate
Justice Shah: grievance redressal committee can examine medical records of deceased patient and take a call within 30 days and order the compensation. such committee will have the power to call for records from the hospitals.
Justice Shah: in case of death certificates already issued and if family members are aggrieved by cause of death mentioned in the certificate, it will be open to approach the committee and submit relevant documents and seek a modification of such certificate.
Justice Shah: NDMA and Ministry of Health are directed to issue guidelines to have the above directions implemented by the state.
Justice Shah: In terms of the above the plea stands disposed off.

#supremecourt
Ex gratia compensation for COVID-19 deaths should be paid even if death certificate does not mention COVID: Supreme Court

report by @DebayonRoy

#Covid_19 #SupremeCourt #COVIDDeath

Read story: bityl.co/8xcZ

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

4 Oct
#SupremeCourt hears a plea regarding setting up of a commission of inquiry for proper distribution of oxygen

Justice Chandrachud: we don't set up commissions of inquiry here. We have set up a national task force. we cannot encroach upon the executive domain

#covid19
Justice Chandrachud: it is very easy to criticize the court or government without being on the hot seat. . Is it fit we conduct a legal post mortem of the issue now here?
Justice Chandrachud: You must invoke remedies under CrPC before seeking CBI probe and this is not a case for commission of enquiry. article 32 is to be the last resort..lets do something positive for the society...
Read 12 tweets
4 Oct
Mumbai Court to shortly hear remand for #AryanKhan and 2 others in relation to the cruise ship drug case.

The other 5 accused will also be produced before for their first remand.

#AryanKhanArrested
#NCBRaids

@narcoticsbureau
The Holiday Magistrate had remanded Khan and two others to NCB custody till October 4, 2021.

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Hearing before Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate RM Nerlikar.

Adv Satish Maneshinde to appear for Khan.
Adv Sartaj Shaikh to appear for Dhamecha and Merchant.
Special Public Prosecutor Advait Sethna to appear for NCB.

#AryanKhan
#ncbraid
Read 106 tweets
4 Oct
#SupremeCourt to hear a plea by Real estate company, @Supertechltd seeking modification of the top court's August 31 judgment by which the Court had directed the demolition of the 40-storey twin tower building of Supertech's Emerald Court project at Noida @noida_authority
Justice Chandrachud: how can this be maitainable?

Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: we are seeking to implement the order.

SC: You want to keep T16 and demolish T17, this is not maintainable. you cant file an MA when a judgment has been delivered
Justice BV Nagarathna: its like seeking implementation of the verdict on your own terms

Justice Chandrachud: its just not on marginal distance. its on other aspects

Rohatgi: one is distance and one is the green area issue
Read 14 tweets
4 Oct
Adv Tanveer Ahmed Mir rebuts Prosecution's arguments against #SharjeelImam who has sought bail in a case connected to #DelhiRiots before Delhi Court. "Sole indictment on the speech. Incumbent duty upon all of us to look at the speech... If it incident violence"
Mir argues in a case of #Sedition against Imam. On #NRC, Mir argues ultimately his client's speech talks about advocating of a policy like... "In a university if we don't debate public policies, where do we debate?" #sharjeel_imam #CAA_NRC #DelhiRiots
Mir: This is a criminal court. We don't go by inferences. I am not denying my speech. For the speech to fall under #Sedition... My friend can't have discretion to add his own thoughts and inferences. #sharjeel_imam #DelhiRiots
Read 78 tweets
4 Oct
#SupremeCourt hears plea by West Bengal govt for a stay on investigation in post poll violence cases claiming that #CBI has not received pre-requisite permission from state.
Hearing begins.

#SupremeCourt
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal: This is that suit..

Justice L. Nageswara Rao: Where is the Union? Where is the solicitor?

#SupremeCourt
Read 5 tweets
4 Oct
#SupremeCourt to hear a PIL seeking direction to the Centre to frame model pacts for builders and agent buyers to protect customers and bring in transparency in the realty sector in tune with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) Act, 2016 @AshwiniUpadhyay
Sr Adv Vikas Singh: It's a PIL

Justice Chandrachud: the next plea is a claim against a developer we will not entertain this. But regarding this plea under what provision and how will this model agreement be framed

Singh: it should be by the centre for states to follow
Singh: There is no mandatory language. states may or may not frame the model BBA. There should be a model to be adopted by the states

Justice Chandrachud: is there a provision allowing Centre to frame this model BBA
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(