Supreme Court to hear a plea filed by Azim Premji against Bengaluru Court summon over alleged illegal transfer of assets worth several crores #supremecourt#azimpremji
Adv PB Suresh: i appear for the petitioner. Pursuant to earlier order I have filed a two-page synopsis.
Justice SK Kaul: how much time will you take? there are other matters so we can take up end of the board
Suresh: We wont take more than 45 minutes
SC: We will take this up at the end of the day
Hearing resumes
Sr Adv S Ganesh: PCRs based on ground that properties belong to central government. Division bench of Karnataka HC in March 2021 held central govt order rules out any possibility of misappropriation of any property.
Justice Kaul: when is the criminal contempt proceeding next listed?
R Subhramanium for respondent: its on October 19
SC: We feel we can do better with our time. We would like to see what happens in the contempt proceedings. There are some things to see if criminal contempt is proceeded with. at the moment we will continue the stay and see what happens.
SC: we are told criminal contempt proceedings are on October 19. List for directions on nov 30
SC: we are informed that contemnors have not filed any reply to contempt notice but instead filed an application for recall of contempt notice. in this case petitioner before us must file the reply to contempt notice. such a reply be filed before two days of the HC hearing date
Sr Adv Ganesh: Everyday there are new proceedings that are being filed in Karnataka, Delhi, Mumbai. Please pass an order for not initiating any proceedings till 20th
SC: we can’t pass such all-encompassing orders. Let the High Court deal with the matter. Let us what the high court does or take a call.
Sr Adv Ganesh: this is a blatant abuse of the process of law
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#SupremeCourt to hear a plea by BJP MP Subramanian Swamy seeking framing of guidelines to prevent huge NPAs @BJP4India@Swamy39
Dr Swamy: this matter arises after your observations on this issue, this plea deals with large cases and methods by which large number of NPAs do not occur again
SC: Dr Swamy how do we frame guidelines so that non performing assets do not occur? its for the legislature
Dr Swamy: This will be beneficial for everybody..
Justice Vikram Nath: RBI, Finance ministry has been issuing guidelines and policies are framed so that NPAs do not occur. there is no need for us to interfere in all of this
[LIVE THREAD] Supreme Court to hear its suo motu case concerning Lakhimpur Kheri violence that left eight dead, including a group of farmers (RE- VIOLENCE IN LAKHIMPUR KHERI (UP) LEADING TO LOSS OF LIFE) #SupremeCourt#LakhimpurKheri#SuoMotu
A bench of Chief Justice of India NV Ramana and Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli will hear the matter post 10.30 am today #SupremeCourt#LakhimpurKheri
In the wake of the violence, two lawyers from Uttar Pradesh had written a letter to CJI NV Ramana seeking a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) #SupremeCourt#LakhimpurKheri
Sr Adv Vikas Singh for Unitech: how long will this ex parte hearing go on? I am the second-largest real estate developer who has built around 5 crore square feet area and over 1 lakh units
Justice DY Chandrachud: This is not an ex parte hearing. You are not entitled to peruse the case diary..
Sr Adv Vikas Singh: I don't want your lordships to repent later on that you did not take timely action. I am sure the court has nothing personal against the Chandras.
Justice MR Shah: these are just your defences..
Sr Adv Singh: i should have been given the Grant Thornton report. I should have been able to show that there is no diversion of funds
Special Public Prosecutor Advait Sethna appearing for NCB mentioned the matter. However Addl. CMM RM Nerlikar stated that the matter will be taken post lunch at 2.45 pm.
Divan: Our central point is when you have governmental functionaries, or high governmental functionaries in this case, can they create a structure that is apparently exempt from the Constitution or outside the reach of the Constitution?