Sr Adv Vikas Singh for Unitech: how long will this ex parte hearing go on? I am the second-largest real estate developer who has built around 5 crore square feet area and over 1 lakh units
Justice DY Chandrachud: This is not an ex parte hearing. You are not entitled to peruse the case diary..
Sr Adv Vikas Singh: I don't want your lordships to repent later on that you did not take timely action. I am sure the court has nothing personal against the Chandras.
Justice MR Shah: these are just your defences..
Sr Adv Singh: i should have been given the Grant Thornton report. I should have been able to show that there is no diversion of funds
Singh: in trial if it is found that there is no diversion of funds, then can the clock be turned backwards and put time back into my hand. shouldn't the grant thornton report be given to me now itself.
Singh: is it justified for me to go to trial and if i get acquitted then who will compensate me. I have sold 1 lakh units. In Amprapali matter homebuyers were made to pay installments, why cant you order same here.
Singh: How many companies will this court run.. Amrapali you are running, Unitech you are running, Supertech you are running... you have arrested my father, my wife, arrest my children also. Put us all behind bars. Atleast let me defend Grant Thornton report
Justice Chandrachud: Before you make allegations on this court, what is this language? What is this repent later on.
Justice Chandrachud takes his mask off: LISTEN TO ME LISTEN TO ME. Is this the way of addressing the court?
Justice MR Shah: don't pitch your voice and say such things and make allegations on this court..
Justice Chandrachud: we can see that the client has not briefed you well..
Singh: i have taken a lot of briefings
Singh: please ask Grant Thornton if there was any questioning of the Chandras. Please hear me and i don't if at all it will happen and if it happens after doomsday
Justice Shah: there are reasons and reasons to arrest both of them. We cannot disclose them to you at this stage
Justice Shah: we never expected this from Mr Vikas Singh, with all seriousness.
Singh: My clients cannot have a video conference with me
Justice Chandrachud: we have perused the inquiry report dated September 28 submitted by Shri Rakesh Asthana, Delhi police commissioner
Justice Chandrachud: In terms of para 37 of the report, wegrant permission for a full fledged criminal investigation against the person mentioned and also against the unknown persons who are not mentioned.
SC: The Police commissioner has stated that a criminal case be registered under sec 7, 8, of PCA ... we direct that officials of Tihar jail who were prima facie found to be complicit will be suspended for the time being till the pendency of proceeding.
SC: We direct Union ministry of home affairs to respond to suggestions contained in para 38 of the inquiry report
SC: An action shall be drawn up for implementing the suggestions made before this court, this will be complied with within a period of 4 weeks.
SC: ASGs have placed before the court the criminal investigation report of SFIO dated July 2021 and the third status report of @dir_ed dated September 2021 and Sep 23 status report
SC: The court shall be apprised on or before the next day of updated status report of ED and SFIO. Mr Vikas Singh appearing on behalf of accused submits that report of forensic auditors Grant Thornton be made available to him to enable proper defence
SC: At present from status reports filed it emerges that report by forensic auditors is subject matter of probe by ED. It will not be in accordance of law to provide underlying material which forms subject matter of investigation to accused at this stage
Supreme Court is hearing pleas challenging the rehabilitation policy including the eligibility criteria framed by the Municipal Corporation of Faridabad with respect to the demolitions at Khori Gaon #khorigaon
Haryana AAG Arun Bhardwaj : When matter was filed initially before Chandigarh HC, Aadhar was not their basis. A list of Documents are required for preparation of Aadhar card
SC: Bench: We were saying for grant of provisional allotment, go through whatever documents they have
Justice Khanwilkar: go through to show their residence, which will later be verified by you. Can’t that be done counsel?
AAG: to that extent it’s possible. We are not inclined to take it as a proof, that is our submission
Senior Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan appears before a Bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and BV Nagarathna on behalf of doctors appearing in the #NEETPG exam seeking uploading of answer key.
Sr. Adv. Sankaranarayanan: For some reason a completely different method has been adopted with us. We don’t get to keep our question paper, answer sheets or the answer key. All we get is the roll number with our score.
Counsel appears before #SupremeCourt Bench led by Justice Chandrachud seeking directions for the vaccination of 13 inmates of a home maintained in Ghaziabad.
It was submitted that the Petitioner is a registered Charitable trust and among its objected maintains a home for orphans, destitute widows, abandoned & aged.
The home presently provides shelter to 13 inmates, some suffering from dementia, old age ailments and some of them are wheel chair bound. Some of the inmates were stated to have Aadhar Cards while the rest were found abandoned on the street.
Justice Chandrachud: A PIL has been filed under Article 32. Specific issue canvassed is during covid pandemic patients had to take recourse to taking medical facilities in private hospitals due to dearth of public infrastructure. #supremcourt#covid19
Justice DY Chandrachud: There were instances of overcharging and hapless patients In the circumstances the petitioners have relied upon certain instances where local bodies such as Pune Municipal Corp had issued notice to private hospitals for overcharging patients.
Justice DY Chandrachud: Mandamus has been sought to set up a mechanism by central govgt to scrutinise bills of patients who believe they have been overcharged. This conerns a wide strata of society. Issue notice , returnable after 4 weeks.
Supreme Court hears a plea by Action Committee Unaided Recognized Private Schools with regard to access to technology by children who are attending online classes and funding needed for the same #supremecourt
Sr Adv Shyam Divan: this is not just about EWS students but about all. its a global problem, Under RTI Act there is no 100% compensation given to schools. burden gets transferred to fee paying students
Justice Chandrachud: we see our staff members who have children studied from one mobile phone. How many families can afford laptops? this is an important issue