Special Public Prosecutor Advait Sethna appearing for NCB mentioned the matter. However Addl. CMM RM Nerlikar stated that the matter will be taken post lunch at 2.45 pm.
Adv Sethna: 1 and 2 are directors of the event managment company and 3&4 are people@who are directly involved for what happened on the ship.
We have invoked 25 and 27A of the NdPS Act.
Adv Sethna: Investigation has revealed that all these persons are@integral for the organizing on the cruise. The event took place before boarding and after boarding. These persons are important to find out the role of the earlier arrested.
Sethna: There is a debate on how the accused boarded the ship. Whether the boarding passes were given or not will be clear from these accused. Detailed custodial@interrogation to find out the nexus with the already arrested.
Sethna: The shipping officials did not have proper license from the DG shipping. The 12 persons arrested, their nexus and corroboration may be allowed.
I am requesting custody till October 14, 2021.
Sethna: The organizers are here, face to face confrontation is required for discovery of truth. My learned friend may not argue on the applicability of sec 25, 27a now.
Sethna: these sections are important because the persons were intercepted before boarding of the ship. The ship still sailed, when it came back to the shore, another raid was conducted and seizures were made.
Gangurde: We were detained from October 4, and then we were arrested on October 5 and then produced. i am only going to submit that on the illegal detention and not go on the ndps sections.
Gangurde: It is hightime that the moment the accused was apprehended and his movement was restricted, he is out under complete control of the investigation officer.
Gangurde: Our detention and arrest is in clear violation of our fundamental rights. This remand is illegal and we are entitled to be released.
Further we are not the organizers, but the contractors.
In my limited tenure, they have taken care to file an application. But they have been careful..
Documents speak for itself. Arrest memo..
Sethna: The time if noted.. and we also tried to mention the matter. That would affect the officers. The superintendents are from Delhi, the illegal detention will affect the officers also.
Sethna: They chose to come to the NcB office post notice, they wrre interrogated and they were arrested. Within 24 hours of arrest as on the memo, we have produced them. We have been extremely careful, and illegal detention has not happened absolutely.
Gangurde: They themselves are saying now that I co-operated and came to the office when called upon.
Whatever interrogation was required could have been done for 12 hours from October 4, and we could have been produced on October 5, 2021.
Sethna: No malafides..
Court asked when were accused prodcued?
Sethna: At 1.15 pm
Court (order): The accused were produced at 1.45 pm and because the court was busy, the court stated they be produced at 2.45 pm. The accused were produced at 3.30 pm.
Order: NCb seeks custody of the accused. Perused remand report, case diary. Heard special counsel and counsel for accused at length.
Order: on arrest of accused not justified in accordance with law.
NCB argued that the accused were integral on the cruise on which contraband was seized. It was important to confront with present accused.
Order: It was important to find out what was found before boarding of ship and after the ship set sail. It is important to find out nexus and role of present with previous accused.
Order: Gangurde argued at October 4 at 7 am took control of accusrd while they were on board. After interrogating the accused were produced at 12.30 and he was arrested against his wish and his arrest was shown on October 5 at 5.30 pm and produced today.
Order: He said it was overriding fundamental rights under art 21 and 22. There was no contraband found in their possession. Despite accused request, no blood test was carried out and that was breach of Fundamental rights.
Orde: They wre compelled to give confession against their wish. I have gone through submissions of the accused and contents of remand report, wherein they disclose that all accused were arrested, if considered this fact then it appears that all accused were arrested and produced
Order: beofre court at 3.30. Hence the accused submisisons are not useful as it is contrary to arrest memo. The illegal arrest argument is required to be rejected.
Order: The NCb custody and the nature of allegations, custody is necessary for interrogation and@investigation@as to whether the accused is innocent or not.
Order: Remand till October 14, 2021.
#BREAKING: Aryan Khan drug case: Four more accused remanded, total of 16 persons now in NCB custody
Senior Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan appears before a Bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and BV Nagarathna on behalf of doctors appearing in the #NEETPG exam seeking uploading of answer key.
Sr. Adv. Sankaranarayanan: For some reason a completely different method has been adopted with us. We don’t get to keep our question paper, answer sheets or the answer key. All we get is the roll number with our score.
Counsel appears before #SupremeCourt Bench led by Justice Chandrachud seeking directions for the vaccination of 13 inmates of a home maintained in Ghaziabad.
It was submitted that the Petitioner is a registered Charitable trust and among its objected maintains a home for orphans, destitute widows, abandoned & aged.
The home presently provides shelter to 13 inmates, some suffering from dementia, old age ailments and some of them are wheel chair bound. Some of the inmates were stated to have Aadhar Cards while the rest were found abandoned on the street.
Justice Chandrachud: A PIL has been filed under Article 32. Specific issue canvassed is during covid pandemic patients had to take recourse to taking medical facilities in private hospitals due to dearth of public infrastructure. #supremcourt#covid19
Justice DY Chandrachud: There were instances of overcharging and hapless patients In the circumstances the petitioners have relied upon certain instances where local bodies such as Pune Municipal Corp had issued notice to private hospitals for overcharging patients.
Justice DY Chandrachud: Mandamus has been sought to set up a mechanism by central govgt to scrutinise bills of patients who believe they have been overcharged. This conerns a wide strata of society. Issue notice , returnable after 4 weeks.
Supreme Court hears a plea by Action Committee Unaided Recognized Private Schools with regard to access to technology by children who are attending online classes and funding needed for the same #supremecourt
Sr Adv Shyam Divan: this is not just about EWS students but about all. its a global problem, Under RTI Act there is no 100% compensation given to schools. burden gets transferred to fee paying students
Justice Chandrachud: we see our staff members who have children studied from one mobile phone. How many families can afford laptops? this is an important issue
Senior Advocate Nakul Dewan mentions matter regarding internet shutdowns before #SupremeCourt: This is an MA in the Anuradha Bhasin Matter. It was filed last year.
CJI Ramana: Already the internet has got.. what remains in this matter?
Sr. Adv. Dewan: We are seeking further directions for the effective compliance of your Lordships order.
For eg, Meghalaya is not even aware of the order.
CJI Ramana: Mr. Counsel, this judgment is in the #Kashmir context, we have already.. the govt. immediately has restored internet. What do you want again?