China Credit Update - Mini Thread (10/6/21) ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡
2. #Evergrande made headlines in the US two weeks ago when markets dropped 2%. But the slide was more likely due to gamma "unclenching" after a massive 9/17 options expiration. Since Evergrande has now been deemed "contained", attention has moved elsewhere.
3. The story was never #Evergrande. The story is a decade of unsustainable, unproductive debt fueled growth that is key to Chinese economic growth, holds the countries wealth, and is at risk of imploding as Beijing breaks the implicit debt backstop.

4. But #Evergrande is important because forced the Chinese homebuyers and banks, as well as international debt holders to recognize the central backstop is indeed dead. It has sparked contagion both in the property market and the financing market.

5. #EG shows asset sales, referenced by commentators and ratings agencies, are not a viable option. A debt spiral does not end with unencumbered valuable assets. All value has been extracted, pledged, or sold. #EG collapses when there is nothing to sell and no more debt available
6. Contagion is now a reality as recent data shows. The property market is frozen. Land sales have plummeted putting stress on local govts, new home sales (developer revenue) have crashed, and no one will provide financing to developers to service debt.

7. Contagion is an accelerating, self-reinforcing process. USD bonds of #Sunac and #Greenland - with combined liabilities greater than Evergrande - have plummeted in recent days, far faster than Evergrande's bonds over the summer.
8. As revenue and financing dries up to all developers, even "higher quality" developers will come under increasing stress. A trade idea is highlighted below that so far has proved wise.

9. Its now near impossible to restore the faith of the home buyers or lenders as they seek to minimize exposure. IMO, this ends with the forced recognition of accumulated losses by banks that will result in a tumult in the Chinese credit markets.

10. While this is most directly a domestic Chinese issue, it has global implications. Transmission to US markets, IMO, will not happen through direct exposure, but merely as a potential catalyst for massive volatility unwind already underway.

11. As always - this is one *non-expert* opinion. Please feel free add your thoughts to the conversation.

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
ใ€€

Keep Current with TheLastBearStanding

TheLastBearStanding Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheLastBearSta1

8 Oct
๐Ÿšจ๐ŸšจVideo of protests at Ping An Bank as of yesterday where police were called. Apparently being censored locally. Details unclear at this point, but could be related to developer Sichuan Languang ...
Things are getting hotter. Meanwhile smaller than expected liquidity injection in the first and the Global Times is making it absolutely clear it intends to pop the bubble.
Sichuan Languang details as of a couple weeks ago here:
Read 4 tweets
4 Oct
๐ŸšจThe Volatility Squeeze: TLDR Twitter Thread๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡
2. Volatility is a financial product, complete with ever-growing chain of derivatives and structured products. Each stage magnifies leverage and exposure. There are also indirect connections that amplify these movements (dealer hedging, risk parity funds, etc.)
3. Volatility is subject to short squeezes given its unlimited downside. Structured products and derivatives can amplify these moves. The first volatility squeeze occurred on "Volamageddon". Short Vol products were wiped in a day.
Read 13 tweets
27 Sep
๐Ÿšจ๐ŸšจBanks in Theory and Practice (9/27/21)๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡
THEORY: Banks play a crucial role in a country's economy. They take money that is not currently being used and lend it to others. Through extending credit, they are allocating resources, but importantly they are also responsible for assessing the value of capital they have lent.
3. Example: a bank lends $100, and that money is used by the borrower to generate value, that ensures the bank is repaid $100 with interest. But that doesn't always happen. Its up to the bank to constantly reassess the value of that loan and the likelihood they will be repaid.
Read 24 tweets
22 Sep
๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ The Argument for a Bank Crisis (9/22/21) ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡

If contagion in the property sector spreads, and the sector continues its rapid contraction, a Chinese banking crisis is *IMO* is a significant risk if not a probability.
2. The belief that banks are not at risk ignores both huge direct and indirect property exposure as well as the direct warnings of Chinese regulators. Its rooted in the belief of power and desires of central intervention; the same faith that incorrectly assumed an EG bailout.
3. Setting the backdrop, on 12/31/20 Chinese regulators directed domestic banks to limit their property exposure to 40% of their total loan book in order to head off systemic risk, and provided them four years to comply. spglobal.com/marketintelligโ€ฆ
Read 23 tweets
15 Sep
๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿšจ China Credit - Writing on the Wall - and How to Trade It. (9/15/21)๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡
2. In June, I described contagion in the Chinese credit as a tail risk - not necessarily a probability, a significant risk that was being underpriced. But now the fuse has been lit and no one is stamping it out. The collapse of the property sector is now a probability.
3. (If you're newer to the saga, I'd encourage you to read this master thread below thread in sequence as it provides necessary pretext. If you're up to date, then jump right in.)
Read 27 tweets
10 Sep
This relates to EG's wealth management product ("WMP") of which 99% of employees are invested in (they are protesting). Some top brass left and were paid out before payments halted. WMPs are a huge funding source for developers. Citizens (who buy apts) are creditors. Disaster.
2. WMPs, which are funded by citizen's savings, totaled $1 TRILLION dollars according to BBG, and regulators are cracking down. bloomberg.com/news/articles/โ€ฆ
3. Reported: Staff of Shenzhen Financial Bureau: โ€œWe are not sure if Evergrande Wealth belongs to the Financial Bureau, the China Banking Regulatory Commission, or the Peopleโ€™s Bank of China. It is currently not on our P2P list.โ€
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(