If there's something relevant from a public engagement perspective I'll add to this thread
2/ Some prepared remarks from ED first. The law worked best, she says, when the publics' views are put front and centre of any data use #IfGDenham
3/ Big things on her desk are #transparency, #AI#algorithms and #BigData < I wonder how many of those are big things from the public's perspectives? Suspect outcomes and impacts are much more relevant, less about data #IfGDenham
4/ she says that people are most concerned when it is unclear how their data is being processed, central to public trust is when people are at the centre of decisions about data #IfGDenham
5/ She is calling on the government to keep the concept of fairness when decisions are being made by algorithms and AI #IfGDenham
6/ she's calling for #FOI to be extended to private organisations delivering public services, and noting that #transparency requires records to be kept and maintained especially during a crisis #IfGDenham
7/ A key theme of what she's saying is that the principled based nature of the law works well as it gives flexibility in different contexts and at times of crisis #IfGDenham
8/ < I'm sure this is true, but don't think we do enough to engage publics in how the principles are interpreted in different contexts. It may not be possible in a crisis (arguable) but certainly could happen post-hoc #IfGDenham
10/ On WhatsApp usage by ministers, she doesn't think that we should stop ministers using private communication channels, but they are still covered by the law, they need to be preserved and one way is a positive duty to document which must be independently enforced #IfGDenham
11/ She's calling strongly for the ICO to remain independent from government, including the appointment of the Commissioner and it's codes and policies to remain independent from ministerial sign-off #IfGDenham
1/ Looking forward to the launch of @GenomicsEngland's #newborndialogue report which starts in a few minutes. I'm going to be live tweeting. With over 1000 people signed up it's full, but you can follow along here
3/ If you are interested in finding out more about @sciencewise and the support it offers government bodies to engage the public effectively, you'll find that here - sciencewise.org.uk/about-sciencew…
Sitting in on the "Science and Society, 20 years on: legacy and lessons for a post-Covid world" conference. I'll try to tweet key points that strike me, but not live tweet to avoid spamming you buff.ly/3cnx13O 1/
Kicking off is @jameswilsdon reminding us that the reason for the event is that we are twenty years on since the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee published its seminal report on Science and Society. And the issues in there are still live publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ld… 2/
How do we balance the educational needs of children against
i. the health needs of teachers,
ii. the health needs of the wider population
iii. the wider economic impact?
2/ Whatever we decide will entail difficult choices which will affect different groups differently, in different ways and over very different timescales. At its starkest, the longer term education of our children vs short term economy?
What a choice, what an awful choice.
3/ But we need to make it, not debating it and trying to ignore it doesn't make the choice go away, it is just made by default, by the virus in fact
The Patch (@BBCRadio4) is a wimsical little programme set around the conceit of investigating a random postcode every episode 1/
The Patch just tackled homelessness in a time of Covid in London’s Square Mile bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0… 2/
The Patch just did for my understanding of homelessness what I think BBC news programmes and esp @BBCr4today should be doing day in day out instead of stupid short gotcha interviews presenting false balance 3/
I share your sense of outrage at what is happening in Portland. But I think that to blame deliberative democracy is to misunderstand what democracy is 1/
2/ Democracy isn't one thing. Here in the UK, through the 80s and 90s, those campaigning for greater democracy were focused on institutions: establishing a constitution, proportional representation, an elected House of Lords etc
3/ All of these things are important components of democracy, but they won't magically transform the UK into some sort of utopian democracy. Not on their own, and not even if they all happened
This episode of the @BertelsmannFdn How To Fix Democracy podcast series with Malcolm Rifkind is interesting for a couple of reasons, although I didn't find most of his insights particularly compelling (there are better episodes) buff.ly/2O9LSE4
2/ Right at the start Rifkind is asked why he got into democratic politics. He says aged 15 he joined a school debating club and carried on through university
3/ as an aside he notes that all schools have this - I think this betrays his background, all public schools perhaps, and prompts my first set of thoughts about his world view on democracy