They agree that it is "important that all patients with this condition are given access to the best possible services and treatments available." Whoopy do. Nobody disagrees, *especially* not NICE
Non sequitur. That mental and physical health are linked is of course a truism. But it does not follow that a mental therapy (e.g. CBT) can be used treat a physical harm (e.g. your broken leg). Sometimes, psych therapy is useless. CBT doesn't "cure" MECFS
This "considerable disquiet" is anecdotal. By contrast, patient, clinician, and scientist disquiet with the old CBT/GET guidance is very much on the record. If disquiet really mattered, we'd have had a new #MECFS guideline years ago
6/12
So they now *agree* that GET as described in PACE (and as defended for years) should never be used.
Glad to see them finally throwing the PACE trial under the bus. Good riddance
🧵Possible reasons why "There is no evidence that.."
1. Claim untrue 2. Claim true but evidence is misinterpreted 3. Claim true but wrong evidence is examined 4. Claim true but no data are available so we can *say* there is "no evidence"
For 1 to hold, 2-4 need to be ruled out
Some scientists will assert that burden of proof should be on a claimant. Where no "evidence" exists, a claim should be rejected, to avoid an "argument from ignorance".
But this presumes scientific infallibility. The scientist could just be wrong.
Yesterday I (& many others) tweeted about a highly dubious proposal submitted to the Senate of the British Psychological Society, that the Soc support "an information campaign to promote a biopsychosocial approach to #LongCOVID" 1/9
In my view (and that of others) the bid represented yet another brazen professionally territorial attempt to "claim" #LongCOVID as a psychological illness, in defiance of fast-accumulating scientific evidence to the contrary 2/9
Such efforts to "psychologise" physical illnesses not only stigmatise the ill & marginalised, they also promote a tolerance for bad research that reflects extremely poorly on psychological science & stifles its true potential 3/9 #LongCOVID#mecfs
What an ill-educated, badly reasoned & frankly dumb comment this is, posted under story by @TimesONeill on new treatment standard for ME (myalgic encephalomyelitis)/CFS (chronic fatigue syndrome).
NICE are de-listing CBT & GET (graded exercise) as #MECFS therapies #pwME
1/16
The author of the comment, MichaelS (who he?), makes many ranty points, touching on a several demeaning anti-disability tropes.
Internet comments that stigmatize disability groups are nothing new, unfortunately. But this comment is special
The commenter says, "how does he expect to measure success of such therapies, if not by patient reporting? There is no other measure of the impact of this condition!"
The "friends-of-friends" network guarantees that influential academic figures can effectively mark their own homework, distorting the scientific record and -- for good measure -- undermining the principle of evidence-based clinical practice
An inherent class system empowers privileged professionals to punch down hard on patients who have the temerity to challenge the quality of their clinical work.
In psych fields, this includes the power to dismiss critics as mentally unwell.