What an ill-educated, badly reasoned & frankly dumb comment this is, posted under story by @TimesONeill on new treatment standard for ME (myalgic encephalomyelitis)/CFS (chronic fatigue syndrome).
NICE are de-listing CBT & GET (graded exercise) as #MECFS therapies #pwME
1/16
The author of the comment, MichaelS (who he?), makes many ranty points, touching on a several demeaning anti-disability tropes.
Internet comments that stigmatize disability groups are nothing new, unfortunately. But this comment is special
The commenter says, "how does he expect to measure success of such therapies, if not by patient reporting? There is no other measure of the impact of this condition!"
#MECFS is a long-term & debilitating illness, affecting c. 1% of the population. You will recognise the symptoms, similar to what we see in Long Covid: post-exertional malaise, muscle weakness, orthostatic intolerance, pain, ataxia, etc
Such symptoms are objectively measurable. They are severe, life-changing, & damaging to relationships, education & careers. Many persons with #MECFS are in permanent #lockdown, unable to leave their home, or even their bedrooms, for decades. All measurable.
And contrary to what MichaelS states, many "objective measures of the impact of this condition" HAVE been studied in research.
And the research shows that the old treatments NICE are now rejecting for #MECFS - which MichaelS defends - simply don't work.
Here's a list:
6/16
Objective measure 1: Physical movement & exercise tests
Commonly used. Patients do step tasks, lift tasks, etc, as per any physical fitness assessment. To date, studies have found no detectable benefit in physical performance post-CBT/GET in persons with #MECFS
Actometers are small fitted devices that record physical movements, akin to step-counters. Patients treated with CBT/GET, despite reporting "feeling better", show no improvement in actometer mobility
Also common. A frequent standard is the self-explanatory "6-minute walk test". Patients treated with CBT/GET show NO IMPROVEMENT in walk test score, compared to untreated patients
In fact, in one major study, the walking ability of patients with #MECFS treated using CBT/GET ended up SO POOR that they actually met the criteria for a lung transplant
Objective measure 5: Disability status as per disability payments
Analyses of persons treated using old standard showed their disability payments INCREASED afterwards, even for those that the CBT/GET therapists claimed had "recovered"
It's a shame people like MichaelS feel so entitled as to comment on news stories despite having such poor knowledge.
I suggest they start by READING THE LITERATURE on #MECFS & not allowing themselves to be brainwashed by scientifically illiterate physician activists...
15/16
In short, there are MANY objective measures of treatment impact in #MECFS. The "scientific community" know this quite well.
NICE are correct to reject the old treatment standard.
Finally, here's a primer I wrote that might be helpful.
Yesterday I (& many others) tweeted about a highly dubious proposal submitted to the Senate of the British Psychological Society, that the Soc support "an information campaign to promote a biopsychosocial approach to #LongCOVID" 1/9
In my view (and that of others) the bid represented yet another brazen professionally territorial attempt to "claim" #LongCOVID as a psychological illness, in defiance of fast-accumulating scientific evidence to the contrary 2/9
Such efforts to "psychologise" physical illnesses not only stigmatise the ill & marginalised, they also promote a tolerance for bad research that reflects extremely poorly on psychological science & stifles its true potential 3/9 #LongCOVID#mecfs
The "friends-of-friends" network guarantees that influential academic figures can effectively mark their own homework, distorting the scientific record and -- for good measure -- undermining the principle of evidence-based clinical practice
An inherent class system empowers privileged professionals to punch down hard on patients who have the temerity to challenge the quality of their clinical work.
In psych fields, this includes the power to dismiss critics as mentally unwell.