I mapped monthly VAERS deaths against all-cause deaths. Red line is 'Average '15-'19 (Baseline)' + VAERS deaths. Barely visible - but is there underreporting?
Earlier this week @stkirsch mentioned up to possible 300k deaths cause by the Vaccine. That would equal to about a 42x multiple, as there are 7,202 deaths reported in connection with the vaccine (not necessarily causation!) from 11/2020 to 10/2021.
This is how it would look.
Note, the red line being much much higher than the actual (blue). So it doesn't really line up...
However, technically it would still be possible, since the baseline includes flu deaths. There about 65k flu deaths each season. Since the pandemic flu has disappeared.
So in April 2021:
- Baseline + Vaers deaths (42x): 333k
- Baseline: 286k
- Actual Deaths: 299k
So there would be an "unexplained diff" of ~34k. So could this be hidden by the missing flu, and some lesser deaths in other categories? I think it's possible, but unlikely.
One example, I like to look at, is Vermont (VT):
They have seen almost no excess deaths so far.
No flu though. VT is seeing about 100 flu deaths or so per year, they are captured in the baseline.
So they could technically be "hidden" in the baseline.
VT has 80% of pop vaxxed.
So far VT has reported 11 deaths to VAERS.
They are at about 6 excess deaths, plus the possible missing 100 flu deaths, that'd be 106 at max.
So the multiple for VT could be at MAX 106/11= ~10.
So any multiple higher than 10 does not really line up with VT.
Nothing is impossible, there could be other factors involved such as migration, but I think it's rather unlikely and VT serves as a good 'control'.
Now, coming back to the US. So how would the initial chart look like with a 10x factor.
Yes, that looks more plausible.
TL;DR: 300k is not ruled out, although I think it's highly unlikely.
If there are any vaccine caused deaths then I think it could be at max 10 * 8068 = 81k deaths.
This is not proof or anything, It's possible that there are 0 deaths from the vaccine, we simply don't know!
But I hope this thread helps you understand how complex this topic is and what is the most likely scenario... Let me know in the comments :)
My current opinion on this topic:
I don't think we can observe a large death toll, caused by the vaccines. However, it's likely that these gene therapy vaccines are likely much more harmful, than traditional vaccines. If they are effective, especially lasting is also a big....
question. From the data I've seen, they likely don't have long lasting effects. Hence all the coercion, pressure, etc. is causing the most harm!
1) So far less than ~120 children aged 5-11 died. 2) 32% of hospitalized children had no co-morbidities. 3) There are 28.4 Million children in the US in that age.
Putting 28M+ children at risk, to MAYBE safe 32%*120 = 38?
1 in 750,000!
Less than
✅Offering the vaccine to children with co-morbidities makes sense.
But approval, which leads to mandates?
❌Mandating 28.4M children to get vaccinated, with severe and unknown side effects?