One of the more challenging aspects of investing in consumer businesses, especially ones that make products that you yourself enjoy, is separating your personal feelings from the investment thesis. Not easy to do.
To be sure, there's value in having an "inside" view, but it can go too far or be misguided, especially if you are not the incremental customer.

There had to be a few die-hard fans of Kodak photographic film who just didn't understand why people were flocking to digital.
Alternatively, those with a strong "outside" view risk being too dismissive of, or not realizing, certain factors that add value.

You might think Starbucks coffee tastes bad, but there are 24.8m Rewards members in the US that disagree and account for 51% of sales.
How to strike the right balance, then? Gathering data is one way, as is seeking disconfirming opinions.

But the key is this: Your personal tastes with consumer products - good or bad - have limited value in developing an investment thesis.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ensemble Capital

Ensemble Capital Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IntrinsicInv

28 Oct
At Ensemble we are obsessed with returns on captial/equity. But it is high and *sustainable* returns we care about. We agree with much of this thread’s point that removing too much slack from corporate business models has led to a less resilient corporate sector.
You want management teams to optimize returns on a cross cycle basis, including preparing for unusually negative down cycles, not optimizing for a pro forma world in which disasters never strike.
The management of the optimal level of slack in an organization is a critical issue. Optimal levels of slack are often non-intuitive, as pointed out in this post about wait times at banks and the number of tellers. johndcook.com/blog/2008/10/2…
Read 4 tweets
11 Oct
Here is our five part growth forecasting series. While the series focused on forecasting growth for faster than average growing businesses, the margin for error is often *less* for slow growth companies. See our prior series on slow growth risk at the end of this thread. 1/x
Growth is to investors what the song of the Sirens was to Odysseus. Yet investors shouldn't just ignore growth potential as traditional value investing often implied. 2/x intrinsicinvesting.com/2021/10/04/for…
But growth forecasting is plagued by systematic, excessive optimism. So investors must find a way to control for this as it is the key reason growth investors underperform. 3/x intrinsicinvesting.com/2021/10/05/for…
Read 10 tweets
3 Sep
1/x A new paper from @ckaiwu uses natural language processing to score corporate cultures. There are a bunch of interesting takeaways. sparklinecapital.com/post/measuring…
2/x The paper identifies seven cultural traits that correlate with equity market outperformance. ImageImage
3/x So far, this just supports what a lot of investors believe about culture being a competitive advantage.
Read 8 tweets
29 May
This dynamic of top talent viewing flexible hybrid work environments as a *requirement* is going to really test some top performing, but old school investment firms. wsj.com/articles/if-yo…
If an analyst is looking for a job, an investment firm that views remote work as a “perk,” requires permission, or has an arbitrary limit, will likely be seen as a firm that is out of touch, doesn’t trust their staff, or is at minimum a slow to adapt organization. Major red flag.
Our guess is there will be a couple year window where top talent incrementally shifts from older established firms to younger, more digitally native, adaptable investment organizations. Then the older firms will capitulate.
Read 4 tweets
28 May
1/x In April of 2020 a pair of articles were published within 24 hours of each other by @pmarca and @morganhousel, which together laid out the roadmap for the economic path we are now following. The ship has already set sail, the question is just what the journey will be like.
2/x in @pmarca's piece, he laid out how the US has stopped "building" and that the time had arrived where the only path forward was to Build. a16z.com/2020/04/18/its…
3/x But how will we pay for it? This was the subject that @morganhousel tackled as he laid out the post WWII history of debt levels consistently falling even as the debt was never repaid. collaborativefund.com/blog/who-pays-…
Read 4 tweets
25 Jan
1/x One of the great things about blogging is you assemble a record of real time thoughts during periods of stress. This allows for reviews of what went as expected and what didn't. Our 2020 posts focused mostly on how we were assessing unprecedented levels of change. Links below
2/x Prior to COVID, we wrote about how forecasts are a necessary part of investing. Your only choice is whether to make explicit forecasts or implicit ones. intrinsicinvesting.com/2020/01/10/pic…
3/x We discussed the key difference between a company's products being "relevant" vs "recognizable" and discussed how highly recognizable products may be losing relevance, which lays a trap for investors. intrinsicinvesting.com/2020/02/21/rel…
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(