Since we're all going to need it, some detail on suspending/terminating the TCA

PDF: bit.ly/UshGraphic95

A few thoughts too

1/
The suspension provisions under Art.772 aren't simple or a free-for-all, as you have to make a strong case for their use and you're bound to be proportionate

2/
By contrast, the general (Art.779) and Part (Art.591/692) provisions on termination don't need any justifications or thresholds, or even to talk about it, so they're much less liable to challenge

3/
And remember here we'd be looking at a cross-linkage from NIP to TCA, so it's not only a major escalation but also a jump of treaty, so EU will want to avoid any gaps in legal logic

4/
Finally, also note the termination clauses don't provide for brakes, so everything would hang on political negotiations to find a solution prior to end of notice period

DSM isn't in play here

5/
Overall, these are quite clunky instruments and Art.772 wasn't really designed for this scenario AFAICS

/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simon Usherwood

Simon Usherwood Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Usherwood

1 Nov
Given that my plan to be on leave while the whole Jersey fishing thing blew over has come to nothing, here's a guide to what the TCA actually says both on access and on disputes

PDF: bit.ly/UshGraphic94

Some thoughts too

1/
Like much of the rest of the TCA, there's a lot that isn't well-specified. Vessels should 'demonstrate' historic access, but how that works practically isn't clear: what's the benchmark and relevant case-law to draw on? (@chris_huggins any equivalent cases?)

2/
Also note provisions at end of Art.502, which suggest this was something the drafters thought might well be reworked, so sense of a bodge is evident

3/
Read 7 tweets
18 Oct
Some thoughts on the UK's approach to the NI Protocol and what that might mean

Short version: UK wants to hold it in unstable situation, to avoid wearing costs of Brexit domestically, but this isn't a long-term strategy

1/
Let's start with how to understand UK HMG's approach to things right now

It seems like there are 3 main ways of looking at it

2/
First is the 'ugh' model: HMG doesn't like the Protocol and just wants it changed to something (maybe even anything) different

3/
Read 28 tweets
13 Oct
A guide to the main areas in which the CJEU has a role in the Withdrawal Agreement/Protocol

PDF: bit.ly/UshGraphic93

1/
In essence, Court's role is to provide definitive rulings on EU law, as it continues to be needed within UK, under terms of rest of treaty

2/
Much of that is transitional, either by nature (e.g. wrapping up existing cases) or design (e.g. time limits on cases on Citizens' Rights)

3/
Read 6 tweets
10 Oct
HMG thinks its aggressive strategy on Protocol is working in getting EU to move, so it's going to continue to push that

Let's think about why this is not the case

1/
This belief has roots in mythology of WA/TCA negotiations, where Johnson Ian view that his erratic behaviour got former through hostile Parliament with some big wins on Protocol

2/
A cursory look at the various versions of that Protocol will show this wasn't actually the case, but the mythology has stuck

3/
Read 12 tweets
4 Oct
Let's think a bit about Frost's speech today and the use of threats in negotiation

1/
To be clear, this is negotiation, given that there is a live process of interaction between EU and UK, both on the narrow issue of making the Protocol work and more generally on the overall relationship

2/
Threats in negotiation are simply the mirror of promises: things that might be in the future, depending on whether the other side do or don't do the thing you want

3/
Read 10 tweets
24 Sep
Since we seem to be having more serious talk about using Art.16, let's just explore how that might work and why it's very unlikely to solve anything

1/
Remember that Art.16 is designed to deal with temporary situations, so it can't be a permanent tool (we'll leave the review and cross-linkage aspects for now), so essentially UK can use it only 2 purposes:
- easing pressure on NI
- raising pressure on EU to renegotiate

2/
On easing pressure,l on NI, the only limit to disapplication of Protocol is that which is under UK control (ie can't stop EU doing what they do)

That means - at most - full disapplication w/in NI/rUK

3/
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(