A guide to the main areas in which the CJEU has a role in the Withdrawal Agreement/Protocol

PDF: bit.ly/UshGraphic93

1/
In essence, Court's role is to provide definitive rulings on EU law, as it continues to be needed within UK, under terms of rest of treaty

2/
Much of that is transitional, either by nature (e.g. wrapping up existing cases) or design (e.g. time limits on cases on Citizens' Rights)

3/
Where it is permanent (disputes, Protocol) this is a function of commitment of parties to involve aspects of EU law permanently

Basis of Protocol is NI alignment to EU rules in many areas, so how else to ensure uniform interpretation?

4/
In current context, removing CJEU completely from WA (or even just Protocol) produces a legal black hole for EU that it's constitutionally bound to refuse

/end
(as always, happy to be corrected by #LawTwitter on any of this)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simon Usherwood

Simon Usherwood Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Usherwood

10 Oct
HMG thinks its aggressive strategy on Protocol is working in getting EU to move, so it's going to continue to push that

Let's think about why this is not the case

1/
This belief has roots in mythology of WA/TCA negotiations, where Johnson Ian view that his erratic behaviour got former through hostile Parliament with some big wins on Protocol

2/
A cursory look at the various versions of that Protocol will show this wasn't actually the case, but the mythology has stuck

3/
Read 12 tweets
4 Oct
Let's think a bit about Frost's speech today and the use of threats in negotiation

1/
To be clear, this is negotiation, given that there is a live process of interaction between EU and UK, both on the narrow issue of making the Protocol work and more generally on the overall relationship

2/
Threats in negotiation are simply the mirror of promises: things that might be in the future, depending on whether the other side do or don't do the thing you want

3/
Read 10 tweets
24 Sep
Since we seem to be having more serious talk about using Art.16, let's just explore how that might work and why it's very unlikely to solve anything

1/
Remember that Art.16 is designed to deal with temporary situations, so it can't be a permanent tool (we'll leave the review and cross-linkage aspects for now), so essentially UK can use it only 2 purposes:
- easing pressure on NI
- raising pressure on EU to renegotiate

2/
On easing pressure,l on NI, the only limit to disapplication of Protocol is that which is under UK control (ie can't stop EU doing what they do)

That means - at most - full disapplication w/in NI/rUK

3/
Read 15 tweets
16 Sep
Thought I'd check how much COM Presidents have actually talked about Brexit in #SOTEU, following VdL's complete silence yesterday

1/
Yes, this is the first #SOTEU that has unambiguously avoided the topic since 2013 (note, no speeches in 2014 or 2019), but 2016 also made no direct reference (although certainly can read entire content that year as repost to #EURef)

2/
2015 was easily the longest absolute text, reaffirming value of UK membership
2017 was very passing
2018 & 20 were about need to conclude negotiations

3/
Read 5 tweets
9 Sep
ah, a variant of madman theory: the 'I can't hold them back' gambit

1/
For newer readers, the madman model is unpacked at length here:



tl;dr the UK isn't credibly able to pursue this option, but that doesn't seem to stop its periodic reappearance

2/
Today's variant is essentially the same, but instead of you being the madman, someone else is, and you're trying to use that to leverage concessions from your counterpart

3/
Read 7 tweets
8 Sep
So #UACES2021 is a wrap. Another excellent demonstration of the strength of European Studies and convening power of @UACES (plus of what a lovely bunch of people you all are)

Huge thanks to UACES office for their hard work to make this all happen, @emlinne, Melina & Emma

1/
The end of #UACES2021 also means I take up my role as @UACES Chair. @NicholasStartin has been a model of leadership and collegiality during an even-more-than-expected period of disruption and I hope to build on his many good works

2/
.@UACES has always been my 'home' association and it's always been a place of support and encouragement and I look forward to making sure that continues for all our members, alongside my fellow officers @JocelynMawdsley @DrKathrynSimps @RGuerrina

3/
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(