Inspired by this thread, I thought I'd take a look back at some early (read: premature) assessments of the Covid situation among children following the return to school (in September and November). 🧵
I don't particularly mean to pick on @apsmunro (sorry if it seems like that). He's hardly the only optimist here -- this example is simply representative of a certain part of Covid Twitter in the first couple of weeks after schools went back in September.
Having said that, I do find it rather curious that a paediatrician would present a graph showing that many thousands of children were testing postive each day in England as cause for celebration or reassurance.
I see cases as bad, and lots of cases as very bad. But I suppose his point was that cases hadn't (yet) exploded following the start of school term.
OK, let's focus on one of those age groups (the one that does regular testing and wasn't subject to massive spikes over the summer).
The first thing to note is that cases were already very high at this point -- not just in absolute terms, but in relative terms, as we can see if we zoom out over the course of the pandemic.
Cases in this age group had gone up in the latter part of the school hols, which should've been a clear indication that herd immunity hadn't been reached following the spike at the end of the last school year. But with enough hope and reassurance you can ignore that sort of thing
But those of us lacking that strict adherence to hope couldn't help noticing that schools hadn't introduced any mitigations over summer, and had removed the few protective measures that had been in place. From that perspective, what happened next was not exactly surprising.
Nor was it surprising when cases fell back down when schools closed for half-term (not sure if @apsmunro made a plot to show that). The fall was very steep and we've gone down to only about a third as many cases in 10-14s as at peak, but rates are still very high, overall.
And yes, it is true that cases started to fall just before the end of term. But this was also expected: it's the pattern we've seen repeatedly. It probably reflects changes in testing behaviour (also worth noting that schools close earlier in some places).
So here we are again, a couple of weeks into term, with cases having fallen quite dramatically in children (much less so in adults). Once again we hear invocations of herd immunity, and Dr Munro is along to spread hope.
A lot of people like hope, and who am I to interfere with them getting their fix? They're free to ignore me (and will). But FWIW, I can't see that children could have reached herd immunity yet, and the situation in schools hasn't improved, so my expectation is that ...
.. we'll see cases start to go back up in school-age children imminently. And then we'll start to see cases rising in parental age groups. And none of this will be helpful for the ongoing crisis in the NHS.
In the time since that tweet reminding us to be hopeful, and definitely not subject to fear, over half a million 10-14 year olds tested positive. That's tens of thousands of new #LongCovidKids. As well as the other implications.
So I would like to make another plea for realism, even if it's not as comforting as hope and reassurance. It's more important that we try to avert bad outcomes than reconcile ourselves to them, or worse (in my view) simply hope that they're not going to happen.
Time for #PlanB.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Covid rates are down, so are we out of the woods? I'm afraid I'm pessimistic. Here's a thread 🧵on what's happened with rates lately and where things might be going (and another plea for additional measures beyond vaccines).
Rates among 10-14 year olds in England have see-sawed over the last month and a half. Not that they've ever got *low*, but the decline since half-term means that the latest rates are more or less equal to the rates on 19th September. (Note that the decline is flattening now).
The same can't be said for what's happened with adult rates over the same period-- those have gone up steadily, by 75% on average (rates have doubled in many groups, but increases have been much smaller among those in their 20s and 80s).
It's been a long wait (it always is with JCVI) but we can finally read the JCVI minutes.
So let's take a look at their arguments against vaccination. 🧵
I'll focus on minutes from Thurs 13 May 2021, which sets out the arguments against vaccination. This has been attracting some attention, understandably, as it confirms the panel's interest in #HerdImmunityViaInfection
Last week I posted this thread about void PCR results. Today the latest testing stats were published, offering an opportunity to check if all the problems affecting testing have been resolved. They haven't - there are more void results than ever. Something is wrong with testing.
to be clear, the main reason for being interested in the % of void results is not that people misinterpret them as meaning they’re safe to go out (thought that probably happens). It’s that a high % of voids is a signal that something is going wrong in the testing process.
THREAD. Encouraged by @fascinatorfun, I've been taking a look at NHS Test & Trace data on void PCR results, hoping this might shed light on how different regions have been affected by the #Immensa lab failure. TL;DR there is a problem affecting labs, but not just for the SW.
If you’ve taken a PCR test, it’s possible (though not likely) that you’ll have had one of these - a void result. It means that the lab wasn’t able to read the sample, or some other problem prevented a definitive result (so you need to do another test). nhs.uk/conditions/cor…
@fascinatorfun noted that voids “often give a clue as to whether there are equipment issues, training needs or overstretched capacity resulting in people rushing and taking short cuts”. And as @OliasDave has shown, the void data are weird.
The 7-day rolling rates for 10-14s in the South West continue to rise alarmingly. In Cheltenham the rate has now reached 6900/100k (for comparison, Kettering, which previously had the highest ever rate for this age group, peaked at 6304/100k). Here's the graph since 1 September.
And for context, if we zoom out over the last year, the graph looks like this. I guess it's a relief that the half-term break is here, but I hope the holidays won't involve lots of socialising with extended family ...
In case you're wondering, having overtaken Kettering, Cheltenham moves into third place in the highest rolling rates in any year group. Second place is held by Nottingham 15-19 year olds (more specifically, 18 year olds in university halls at the start of term last year).
Now that Covid samples from the South West are being sent to a different lab, rolling rates are undergoing a rather dramatic adjustment. Here's a thread 🧵illustrating that, focusing on the rates for 10-14 year olds.
As a reminder, samples from the South West were being sent to a lab that (for reasons that have not yet been explained) was producing a high rate of false negatives.
This thread from yesterday noted that it was already apparent in September that something was fishy.