Historic. And insufficient. That is the dilemma of climate era. We are so stuck in our current systems & so heavily influenced by incumbents who stand to benefit from status quo that even the qualified acknowledgement in text of #COP26 of one fossil fuel, coal feels historic. 🧵
Yet 86% emissions trapped in our atmosphere come from three products coal, oil & gas. Ten years ago 80% of global energy consumption came from those fossil fuels & today? 80%. That’s not because of lack of cheap renewables at scale. It’s because lack of political courage #cop26
#boga is also historic. 11 countries & sub nationals committing to atop expansion of oil and gas and wind down. But in reflection after last two weeks it just seems so sad & absurd that countries announcing they will try & do what science tells us we have to do. #COP26
25 countries committing to stop overseas financing of oil, gas and coal is also historic. But those same wealthy countries continuing to fund and approve new projects at home?! Not only insufficient it’s hypocritical. #COP26
Mention of fossil fuels in the text?! Sadly historic. But again adding the weasel work “inefficient” to subsidies is insufficient. It’s these words & arguments on definitions that have held us back despite a decade of G20 promises. IMF tells us now 11M a minute globally?! #COP26
That’s ordinary peoples money. Over a trillion taxpayer dollars going to big oil and gas and coal companies from our governments to help them stay “competitive” while we simultaneously say “code red for humanity” and every ton of carbon we don’t emit will save lives!? #COP26
As I leave #cop26 I want to remind world leaders & negotiators to remind themselves everyday that every ton of carbon they stop from going into the atmosphere will save lives. And that it’s NOT a transition if they continue to grow the problem. #COP26
Perhaps because of the failure of our governments to include commitment to follow the science by stoping expansion of coal AND oil and gas and the need for a wind down that is managed for equity & Justice the support for @fossiltreaty exploded at #cop26
Feel so lucky to be working with @fossiltreaty growing network & team & to be working on something commensurate with scale of the problem. So inspired by all the youth leaders & MP’s I met who are now working on @fossiltreatycnn.com/2021/11/11/wor…
Also historic this week was 150 parliamentarians from 31 countries endorsing stopping all expansion of fossil fuels and principles of @fossiltreaty. Led by MPs from global south this initiative is growing everyday. It gives me hope. #COP26
Will end this thread with a foundational announcement at #COP26 that is a game changer. @CarbonBubble@GlobalEnergyMon previewing the first ever Global Registry of Fossil Fuel Production & Reserves with @UNEP at a briefing. This will bring accountability & transparency to #COP27
A couple thoughts on today's "CleanBC" roadmap release and @jjhorgan press conference #bcpoli#cdnpoli 🧵
First of all,horrified @jjhorgan referred to LNG as bridge fuel & said he has been talking Carnival about LNG bunkering. I met with Chairman of Board of Maersk last week who was clear that science does not support LNG & gas as being part of decarbonization pathway for shipping.
The @IEA the @IPCC_CH & @UNEP in #productiongap report all conclude that no expansion of fossil fuels is consistent with Paris goal of remaining below 1.5C. LNG is a fossil fuel made from fracked gas. The "bridge fuel" narrative is old, out of date and has no scientific backing
I am old enough to remember being naively excited when BP announced “Beyond Petroleum”. I am also from Canada & for years I thought we did need big oil to be inside to fight climate change 🧵axios.com/shell-ceo-clim…
So here is why I think @Shell’s comments today are disingenuous at best & likely very dangerous: in national, subnatiinal & international fora oil companies have successfully argued to weaken climate policy. I watched it happen in Canada & it is well documented elsewhere
Every right wing think tank and government in Canada is out this weekend whipping up a fervour over the new climate plan and building their base against the Liberals and climate action. And the left is debating the policy details. Bold? Historic? Insufficient? Weak? 🧵#cdnpoli
It strikes me that this is how they win. Drawing clear battle lines. Motivating through fear and anger. We keep replaying this same script - I see it and still struggle to stomach supporting climate policy at this moment in history that is so clearly insufficient 2/
@bruneski once said to me that good climate policy at this moment is often “historic but insufficient”. It seems to be true over and over again. So for the most part ENGO’s are painfully honest - price on carbon yay! Harpers targets?! Insufficient. No ZEV?! What? Etc. 3/
Okay I have listened to the announcement and double checked previous promises, announcements and GHG numbers. Response to the @bcndp@jjhorgan@GeorgeHeyman climate promises made today THREAD/ #bcpoli#BCelxn2020
Committing to increase climate ambition net-zero by 2050 is important but there are announcements and targets and there are actions and budgets. Our emissions in BC are going up and fossil fuel subsidies to expand fracking and LNG in BC have increased 79% under this government
.@jjhorgan emphasized new tech & offsets...really worrying. We need those technologies to reduce pollution already trapped in our atmosphere not to justify more pollution. Any leader serious about climate they will rule out the use of offsets & trading schemes to meet our targets
To be fair, because the emissions data lags almost two years behind, its worth noting that the most significant increase in emissions happened under Christy Clark and the @bcliberals. That said, there is little evidence to support John Horgan and @bcndp meeting BC targets 2/
There is still the matter of the missing 25%. ie even the current modelling under the CleanBC plan shows that we cannot meet our legislated targets due almost entirely to rising emissions from fracking and LNG 3/
FOI docs reveal UK held private talks Oil & Gas companies to plan Glasgow #Cop26. So...oil, gas & coal are 80% of climate problem, these co's still planning expanding production. But sure lets plan climate negotiations with them?! THREAD/ theguardian.com/environment/20…
When the world was negotiating the Montreal Protocol did we invite the chemical companies to design how we would ban their product? How about asbestos? Did the polluters help the world create the plan to stop killing people with that product? 2/
To be clear, I am guilty of going down this road. Because I truly believe there are good people everywhere and we need to understand the barriers to change. I spent four years meeting with the top execs of some of largest oil companies. here are some of the things I learned:3/