"the approach. will be targeted to a specific pathogen, but It Is applicable to several different pathogens. For example, an approach may be used to develop therapeutics against 20 different pathogens"
3. Professor Ron Taylor
This project started in May 1996 at the University of Virginia. Taylor and his colleagues developed a heteropolymer that functions on the one end to connect to the CR 1 site of the red blood cells, while the other end is tailored to the specific pathogen.
4. Mesenchymal Stem Cells
DARPA also funded research into mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) modified to have surface receptors designed for specific pathogens. When pathogen is detected, part of cell's DNA Is turned on to produce a gene protein product targeted to kill the pathogen
5. Strategy
To address specific Biological warfare agents, we will fund work at facilities such as USAMRIID, where actual bioagents are. kept. to determine If the therapeutics are effective In animal models.
6. Pharmaceutical Industry
DARPA will provide the thrust & the biotech industry & pharmaceutical industries will take over these products (clinical testing & development) to commercialize them for their own purposes.
DoD will then procure them via "normal" commercial routes
7. Unconventional Pathogen Countermeasures
"The most sinister offensive biological warfare scenario employs surprise, Immediate proximity &
rapidly lethal, persistent agents in overwhelming quantities"
BAA 97-23 Pathogen Countermeasures
Program Manager: CPR Shaun Jones, MD,USN
8. Advanced. Diagnostics
Program Manager: Dr. Stephen Morse
BAA 97-24 Advanced Diagnostics for Pathogens
9. Red Blood Cell Pathogen Decoy & Destruction
University of Virginia
Boston University - Mark Bitensky birensky@enra.bu.etlu
10. Sequential Auto Vaccination by Stem Cells
Daniel R. Marshak
dmarshak@osiristx.com
OSIRIS Therapeutics, Inc. .
Baltimore, MD
You have a radically new idea for fighting pathogens that colleagues are dubious about
Where would you go for funding?
To the NIH?
NIH would ask a committee of peers to evaluate it who can be brutal about radical concepts
12. Scripps - DARPA - Lerner
Richard Lerner, president of The Scripps Research Institute, another DARPA adviser, notes that the agency needs to keep in mind that ''you never know what you want to discover until you discover it."
DARPA was unable to locate any documents concerning "human cellular platforms used for biological warfare therapy," as you requested.
DARPA advises that this division does not exist, nor does DARPA have such a research program
14.Synthetic Polio
DARPA failed to inform anyone that one of its “unconventional” projects was $US300,000 ($393,939) to fund a trio of scientists who thought it would be a neat idea to synthesise polio.
They constructed the virus using its genome sequence, which was available on the Internet, and obtained the genetic material from companies that sell made-to-order DNA.
But building up the long chain of DNA from smaller pieces proved frustratingly difficult. Eventually, Dr. Cello simply ordered most of the completed sequence from a scientific supply house, Integrated DNA Technologies of Coralville, Iowa
DARPA provided $300K over the last 3 years for the work
''Understanding the process of viral DNA production is key to identifying new ways to kill viruses & understand how viruses could change & escape from vaccines"
"The article is, frankly speaking, utter bullshit. It’s a review of available data & the very first referenced work states the opposite of what he claims"
2. Quote from Worobey
“Despite assertions to the contrary (1), it is now clear that live mammals susceptible to coronaviruses, including raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides), were sold at Huanan Market & three other live-animal markets in Wuhan before the pandemic (2, 3).”
3. Incorrect Citations
Plainly, reference 1 should assert that no live mammals susceptible to coronaviruses were sold at the live animal markets in Wuhan.
In fact, reference 1 states the exact opposite on Pages 8 and 108 (conclusions)
Let’s take a look at the co-authors of the March 17th Nature letter:
I realised, to my surprise, that I had already encountered 3 of the 5 co-authors & they were not people whose work had impressed me on identifying the origins of diseases
3. Eddie Holmes
"It is therefore possible that he is unconsciously sympathetic to Chinese colleagues, and sensitised to avoiding the causing of embarrassment to his hosts"
New documents back theory that Covid outbreak started in Wuhan lab
The emails uncovered by White Coat Waste Project suggest that viral DNA from “bats and other high-risk species” were sent to Wuhan between 2017 and 2019.
Just stating the obvious that THE FIRST CASE WAS NOT IN DECEMBER exposes the mendicant analysis of that recent piece, which feeds of the scraps of data left by China and then props itself up on odd logical shortcuts.
Useful Point by @baobaoxiaoliao
Dr.Worobey, here are some information you might interest in. In the early stage of the outbreak, China Gov only allows patients with Market contact history to receive tests. Is that a bias that can cause misinterpretation?