1/ I know this tweet upset some, but let me add more to properly explain what I meant.
Legislative mandates, initiatives, bills, etc. are trumped by national security. I am EXCITED to see how this all plays out when it comes to UAP "transparency," but we need to be realistic.
2/ I posted yesterday how the 1960s played out very similar to today and we ended up with the Condon report. Will this be the same? I'm no fortune teller, nor is anyone, so who really knows? I just choose to be cautiously optimistic.
But, let me use a modern, non-UFO, example.
3/ President Trump, who sat in the highest office of the land, had the desire to release all JFK assassination files. He had a history of rocking the boat in D.C., and this appeared to be part of that intent.
However, national security won in the end, and secrecy prevailed.
4/ Despite what you think of Trump, he rocked the boat, plain and simple. So, if this was explosive, it would be him that would light the fuse.
Yet, national security trumped even Trump.
So, being realistic is not pessimistic. It's just being real in the face of reality.
5/ Bringing it back to UFOs, politicians know the UAP/UFO issue is hot and will garner votes (sorry, but we all need to admit that's true). So, even the intent to have transparency, will not magically trump national security.
But it will score them points with the voters.
6/ It's why Senators/Congressmen will preach transparency during the election season, but most will sit on committees that have numerous classified sessions that they never tell you or I about. And some of those of late, have been on the UFO/UAP issue.
7/ There has been no push to declassify what was learned in those sessions by anyone. Transparency push? Yes. Declassification push? No. There is a difference.
So, the public will get reports. AND THAT IS A TRIUMPH AND WIN!
I won't hide from that, nor should anyone.
8/ However, the false hope that this all is going to lead to the ultimate truth where we learn ALL the secrets, is likely not going to happen.
But generic reports with little revealed like the one in June can lead to legal pushes for information through #FOIA, and that's a WIN.
9/ But all this leading to a public that can lean back in their chairs and wait for the ultimate truth to be revealed? I'm sorry, but I do not believe there is a chance.
There are many aspects of this that are EXCITING and AWESOME.
But some are making it something it is not.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My take is this: I would not say I endorse the whole disinfo op claim outlined in the article. I still need to see more supporting that, and have long said I do not buy it on that level. But there is much more to this story we don't know.
2/ What I will say in response to the claims here, is that there are NUMEROUS unanswered questions throughout the last few years connected to this entire saga.
We were told many things by TTSA and those connected to it, a lot of which is now proven untrue.
3/ For example, the "chain of custody" claims about the videos they released. The false use of a stock image representing metamaterials, which was of a rock. A CGI photo in a PowerPoint presentation told to the audience as a "real" photo. Etc. Etc.
1/ Thank you to all those advocating for a respectful conversation on this between Richard & myself. There are some important issues long ignored and it's time to discuss. @RichDolan has had an open invite to be on my show w/ FULL permission to prove me wrong to my own audience.
2/ What I feel needs to be said, is I will 100% keep it respectful, as I did with Anthony Bragalia (despite that train wreck) and with @TheProjectUnity. It would not be a "pissing match" as Richard has said numerous times now. That is rubbing off on SOME of his followers...
3/ and this is completely an unfair summation. Never have I been rude to a guest on my show, and to pretend otherwise is a fantasy.
UFOlogy has come so far, and yet, gets set back so far because of silliness such as this.
My video exposed a major flaw in this entire narrative.
1/ I see my colleague (and IMO friend) @RichDolan is sending out the Wilson/Davis 5 HOUR "deep dive" video he did last year. So I generated a transcript to help me find what I knew was there: a FULL reliance on the fake NRO document that many are now back tracking on.
2/ During his interview with the one now known as "Mr. X" as labeled by @TheProjectUnity - @RichDolan, with Mr. X, CLEARLY outlines the story.
I will let the transcript do the talking, but in short, it's clear as day that the NRO document IS indeed crucial to this story.
3/ Many back tracking on this say the NRO document is not mentioned in the Wilson/Davis notes, so who cares?
Although I've addressed this, Richard and Mr X also address the same in their 2020 video. It isn't referenced as "NRO Document" - but it's there alright. See here:
1) For clarity on why I used "UFO Debris" in the title; it's because it is a descriptor that fits. As usual, some noisy attackers feel the need to dig in to every syllable I use in order to somehow derail a story. So, without arguing all day about it, here's a thread to justify.
2) It is not in dispute that @TTSAcademy has collected numerous 'pieces' from #UAPs / #UFOs. These were part of their ADAM project, and extended into the CRADA with the Army.
According to Luis Elizondo, here is a slide of some (all?) of those objects:
3) As you can see, these are fragments, pieces, and yes, debris. The word "debris" uses the word "pieces" within its definition. Either broken off of something, or left after the destruction of something; "debris" is described as lying where they fell.
I think likely then, it really was Greer that told Mitchell, just as I mentioned in this video (maybe he admitted it?). Or Miller, who worked for Greer?
Either way, the more you dig, the more doubt there is. THANK YOU to viewer "NotAWine Mom" for pointing out Mitchell's quote.
Why is this important?
I feel the NRO document is a provable forgery. Greer touts that as convincing Wilson to seek out a alien-tech related SAP. Mitchell admitted years later, Greer upset Mitchell for FABRICATING and name dropping Mitchell as a witness when he wasn't.