1/ Thank you to all those advocating for a respectful conversation on this between Richard & myself. There are some important issues long ignored and it's time to discuss. @RichDolan has had an open invite to be on my show w/ FULL permission to prove me wrong to my own audience.
2/ What I feel needs to be said, is I will 100% keep it respectful, as I did with Anthony Bragalia (despite that train wreck) and with @TheProjectUnity. It would not be a "pissing match" as Richard has said numerous times now. That is rubbing off on SOME of his followers...
3/ and this is completely an unfair summation. Never have I been rude to a guest on my show, and to pretend otherwise is a fantasy.

UFOlogy has come so far, and yet, gets set back so far because of silliness such as this.

My video exposed a major flaw in this entire narrative.
4/ It became so problematic to the biggest believers in the WD "notes" depicting real events; many scrambled. The back tracking; the changing of the narratives; the parading of anonymous "experts"; and the blatant made up mis-truths about what I've said has been very telling.
5/ Then, of course, you have the miraculous discovery of "new" information & "new" evidence that made this all even more "believable" because of what I brought out; but that is being saved for a new blog for some time in the future.🤦‍♂️

In short, this is silliness, but important.
6/ Important because the field of UFOlogy should focus on verifiable facts w/ evidence vs. "leaks" with a foundation that got destroyed and is now only backed by people that can't be named and evidence you can't see.

I will have a conversation with anyone, anytime, and anywhere.
7/ But I devote time to this because if true, it WOULD be monumental. And I would have wanted it to be.

However, the continued attempts to make this a thing take away from the important recent efforts that pushed the field of UFO research forward. Instead, this pushes it back.
8/ And anyone with importance from the outside looking in, if this is what they see, they will likely stop looking in altogether. And, for those who don't see that, you need to look at why no mainstream media outlet or journalist, who are STARVING for UFO related stories,
9/ have run this WD "notes" story as real. They won't and they can't because the evidence just isn't there.

The fact this isn't all over even the British tabloids at the very least, should tell you all something. At least, it does to me.

Anyhow, my invite to @RichDolan stands.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with The Black Vault

The Black Vault Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @blackvaultcom

28 Sep
1/ I see my colleague (and IMO friend) @RichDolan is sending out the Wilson/Davis 5 HOUR "deep dive" video he did last year. So I generated a transcript to help me find what I knew was there: a FULL reliance on the fake NRO document that many are now back tracking on.
2/ During his interview with the one now known as "Mr. X" as labeled by @TheProjectUnity - @RichDolan, with Mr. X, CLEARLY outlines the story.

I will let the transcript do the talking, but in short, it's clear as day that the NRO document IS indeed crucial to this story.
3/ Many back tracking on this say the NRO document is not mentioned in the Wilson/Davis notes, so who cares?

Although I've addressed this, Richard and Mr X also address the same in their 2020 video. It isn't referenced as "NRO Document" - but it's there alright. See here:
Read 8 tweets
7 Sep
1) For clarity on why I used "UFO Debris" in the title; it's because it is a descriptor that fits. As usual, some noisy attackers feel the need to dig in to every syllable I use in order to somehow derail a story. So, without arguing all day about it, here's a thread to justify.
2) It is not in dispute that @TTSAcademy has collected numerous 'pieces' from #UAPs / #UFOs. These were part of their ADAM project, and extended into the CRADA with the Army.

According to Luis Elizondo, here is a slide of some (all?) of those objects:
3) As you can see, these are fragments, pieces, and yes, debris. The word "debris" uses the word "pieces" within its definition. Either broken off of something, or left after the destruction of something; "debris" is described as lying where they fell.
Read 12 tweets
7 Sep
One of the viewers to the below video reminded me that Mitchell *HAS* said if he had heard from Wilson directly he was "denied access."

He NEVER did.

In 2008 Billy Cox got a quote from Mitchell it was all second hand information, as he never talked to Wilson after the meeting.
I think likely then, it really was Greer that told Mitchell, just as I mentioned in this video (maybe he admitted it?). Or Miller, who worked for Greer?

Either way, the more you dig, the more doubt there is. THANK YOU to viewer "NotAWine Mom" for pointing out Mitchell's quote.
Why is this important?

I feel the NRO document is a provable forgery. Greer touts that as convincing Wilson to seek out a alien-tech related SAP. Mitchell admitted years later, Greer upset Mitchell for FABRICATING and name dropping Mitchell as a witness when he wasn't.
Read 4 tweets
5 Sep
Genuine question to @TheUfoJoe, @TheProjectUnity, @OmniTalkRadio and whomever else.

It's accepted to those who believe the Wilson/Davis notes saga, that Wilson was shown Greer's NRO document and that is truly the root of him wanting to go out and verify a alien-tech/UFO SAP?
And for clarity, per UFO Joe's blog, it just seems like that is the motivation for Wilson per Greer sending that document in advance. They then had their meeting. He then went out and discovered what he did, per the notes.

Just making sure I'm not missing something?
Adding this primarily for me in the form of a note, but in @RichDolan's presentation on YouTube, he also falls back on Greer's (& Mitchell's) claims on what motivated the meeting.

Again, Greer said it was the NRO document that set it all off. Just seeking ANYONE who can refute. Image
Read 4 tweets
15 May
1/ When I tweeted out the article by @MicahHanks yesterday (again, kudos to my friend Micah for it!) I made a comment about the downright swiftness of the confirmation he wrote about on the side of the Pentagon. Others have wondered the same, and have asked about my experience...

with the first confirmation I got when @g_knapp and @JeremyCorbell published the first round of imagery. So, I figured I would do this timeline:

4/6 PM Acorn, Metallic Blimp & Sphere photos are published by @MysteryWire.

4/7 AM: I wrote the Pentagon & US Navy for comment

4/8 @JeremyCorbell publishes the "flying pyramid" video. The Black Vault had received no responses from the Pentagon or Navy on the first email.

4/9 I wrote the Pentagon and Navy AGAIN asking about the new material, including *again* the briefing slides, photos and video.
Read 7 tweets
12 Jan
1/ Federal agencies love to give the illusion they release documents to the public in complete collections.

Often, that's proven wrong.

Take the CIA #UFO documents released via #FOIA. Yes, the CIA has had UFO records online, but their archive appears to be incomplete.
2/ There are different ways to see the UFO document collection on the CIA's website, and you can see, the highest output of files is 415. The Black Vault, added 713.

They give the illusion they have it all online. But when you actually research it; it's not all there.
3/ Using the search term "UFO" yields quite a bit. However, looks can be deceiving. These are some of the "UFO" references in their search.

All unrelated and false hits. There's tons of them.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!