Grimes excels at is wading into controversial scientific topics, for which he has little experience or publication record, and “debunking” contrary evidence and real experts as “conspiracy theorists.” @BBCJohnBeattie /2
We now better understand the rare side effects of blood clotting w/ AstraZeneca's vaccine.
Last year, @JannesvanRoermu wrote about Grimes and several characters at the American Council on Science & Health who dismissed possible dangers of radiation.
"Although they do not enjoy any status in academia, they are able to influence the general public," said Dr. Ton Hol /4
When David Grimes sent an inflammatory letter to The BMJ, it was rejected, so he took to Twitter to complain.
Grimes also kicked aside experts in virology, national intelligence and journalism to label #OriginsOfCovid lab leak a "conspiracy theory." Unfortunately, his strong opinion piece in @guardian has some errors. /6
On today's Internet, more than ever, opinions are useless—reporting and real expertise are invaluable. disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/physicist-da…
I invite David Grimes to consider speaking to actual experts when he needs to have an opinion in the future. /END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Pfizer #COVID19 Vaccine Clinical Trial Whistleblower's Documents Released disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/pfizer-covid… The FDA never bothered to inspect Ventavia & Pfizer's clinical trial, but internal documents find Ventavia was terrified of an FDA inspection.
"THE FDA IS COMING....SOON" /1
Ventavia also created a warning to staff to stop unblinding during Pfizer's clinical trial.
C4591001 is the protocol for Pfizer's #COVID19 vaccine clinical trial.
QUESTION: Why has @pfizer continued to hire Ventavia for more vaccine clinical trials? /2
It's become clear that, despite assurances from Tim Appenzeller at Science, that publication won't pursue stories about congressional investigations that make Peter Daszak or the NIH look bad. /2
The latest volley from Science is this odd profile of Peter Daszak that Science's Editor-in-Chief made clear on Twitter was for political purposes to undermine opinions that #originsofcovid could have started in a Wuhan lab. This sort of honesty is called a Kinsley gaffe. /3
In her book, Dewar notes: in January 2020, Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Institute of Virology submitted a study to @Nature and another study to a different journal that contradicted the Nature paper. Neither have been corrected. (Who peer reviews Nature studies?) #originsofcovid /3
I spent years running congressional investigations and twice had to warn attorneys about lying to Congress. The legal standard is clear: Fauci broke the law by misleading Congress about his funding of research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/anthony-fauc… /1
Newsweek, former Acting Director of the CIA Michael Morell, and Columbia University professor Jeffrey Sachs have all found that Fauci's NIAID funded gain-of-function research at Wuhan. Are they lying? Or did Fauci mislead and lie before Congress? #originsofcovid /2