Pfizer #COVID19 Vaccine Clinical Trial Whistleblower's Documents Released disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/pfizer-covid… The FDA never bothered to inspect Ventavia & Pfizer's clinical trial, but internal documents find Ventavia was terrified of an FDA inspection.
"THE FDA IS COMING....SOON" /1
Ventavia also created a warning to staff to stop unblinding during Pfizer's clinical trial.
C4591001 is the protocol for Pfizer's #COVID19 vaccine clinical trial.
QUESTION: Why has @pfizer continued to hire Ventavia for more vaccine clinical trials? /2
In this email, Ventavia notifies staff working on Pfizer's #vaccine clinical trial, "We know we have a problem and we are working as a team to start getting it fixed." disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/pfizer-covid… These problems were endless.... /4
In one email to her bosses, Brook Jackson documented all the problems she was finding in Pfizer's clinical trial. She ended her email, "I might be in a little bit of shock." /5
Ventavia has responded by defaming Jackson and falsely stating she did not work on Pfizer's clinical trial. Jackson's lawyer has sent Ventavia a cease and desist and demand for retraction. /6
To read these documents, please check out @DisInfoChron story, here:
Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Clinical Trial Whistleblower's Documents Released disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/pfizer-covid…
Why can't MedPage Today report on clinical trials instead of resorting to silly "debunking" articles? /END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's become clear that, despite assurances from Tim Appenzeller at Science, that publication won't pursue stories about congressional investigations that make Peter Daszak or the NIH look bad. /2
The latest volley from Science is this odd profile of Peter Daszak that Science's Editor-in-Chief made clear on Twitter was for political purposes to undermine opinions that #originsofcovid could have started in a Wuhan lab. This sort of honesty is called a Kinsley gaffe. /3
In her book, Dewar notes: in January 2020, Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Institute of Virology submitted a study to @Nature and another study to a different journal that contradicted the Nature paper. Neither have been corrected. (Who peer reviews Nature studies?) #originsofcovid /3
I spent years running congressional investigations and twice had to warn attorneys about lying to Congress. The legal standard is clear: Fauci broke the law by misleading Congress about his funding of research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/anthony-fauc… /1
Newsweek, former Acting Director of the CIA Michael Morell, and Columbia University professor Jeffrey Sachs have all found that Fauci's NIAID funded gain-of-function research at Wuhan. Are they lying? Or did Fauci mislead and lie before Congress? #originsofcovid /2
1/4 Researcher Selim Cetiner of @sabanciu in Turkey sure seems flipped out that @GMWatch ran this clip by @corinnelepage defending Seralini's research finding harm from GMO corn.
Cetiner complains it undermines his discussions w/ reporters.