I am currently dangling from a tripod, blocking the entrance to @rbc, the 5th largest fossil fuel funder in the world because decades of politely asking banks to stop fueling climate change hasn’t worked.
Yes I am too old for this shit.
We’re disrupting bank business-as-usual because BAU is killing us. Canada’s big 5 banks have put over $800 billion into fossil fuels since the Paris Agreement was signed. RBC has put $390M into the Coastal Gaslink pipeline #fossilbanks
I’m a middle-aged dad with a mild fear of heights. I hsve been politely asking banks to stop funding fossil fuels for decades but they want to sell gasoline to the arsonists and water to the fire department
So I’m asking RBC CEO Dave McKay to come down from his office tower and accept the burned remnants from a Lytton home
We want him to look at it every time that he makes a decision on whether to fund fossil fuels. We want him to agree to meet with affected communities in Lytton & Wet’suwet’en & look them in the eyes
The profits his bank is making by worsening the climate crisis have real, painful costs in the here and now.
RBC has provided $390M to the Coastal Gaslink pipeline, and the pipeline company’s parent Corp is housed in the RBC tower we are blocking today #gitimden
When banks go along with a militarized RCMP invasion of Wet’suwet’en territory to make money, that’s wrong. RBC has refused to meet with the Wet’suwet’en - they should. #WetsuwetenStrong
Hearing that RBC had a town hall for staff today & re @GreenpeaceCA protest “Leaders said the government asks them to fund this stuff [fossil fuels]”
Say it ain’t so, @s_guilbeault#fossilbanks
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some of the earliest research was done by @exxonmobil and its Canadian arm @ImperialOil, whose scientists had found a clear and credible link between oil and gas combustion and global warming by the 1970s, but the companies went on to deny the problem thetyee.ca/News/2019/12/1…
A 1980 report from Imperial concluded that “there is no doubt that increases in fossil fuel usage and decreases of forest cover are aggravating the potential problem.” desmog.com/2016/04/26/the…
2. It all started with the War Room’s Netflix/Bigfoot petition alerting me to fact that @CDNEnergyCentre was running petitions. Why, I wondered, was a publicly-funded comms outfit gathering names & postal codes like a political party?
3. The War Room is funded thru tax revenues but was set up as a separate corporation with 3 UCP Cabinet ministers on board of directors to TRY to shield it from Freedom of Information requests (more on that later).
Today's Supreme Court decision is a victory not just for the carbon tax. It recognizes climate change as a threat to Peace, Order & Good Government & lays out a roadmap for the federal govt to set minimum standards that provinces can exceed but not undercut.
2. Constitutionally, who could do what on climate was always a bit fuzzy resulting in lowest-common #cdnpoli denominator policies. By calling the question, Premiers Ford, Moe & Kenney have ultimately strengthened the federal government's hand in future battles over climate policy
3. So a win for the feds, but it also takes away one of their main excuses for more aggressive climate policy (need for oil industry-captured provinces to agree). We will hold them to that, while turning up the heat on provincial laggards.
2. It started as a comedy - who among us didn't laugh as the (misleading) anti-carbon tax stickers literally came unstuck due to cheap glue? I mean, what does Doug 'Deco Labels and Tags' Ford know about stickers anyway?
3. Then it morphed into a satire of the courtroom procedural, as the Ford government’s expert witness tried to defend not including any info on the rebates on the grounds that Ontarians are too stupid to grasp anything more complicated than a bumper sticker slogan
Re-upping this in light of news that Alberta's Energy War Room is gearing back up with an expensive new ad campaign, because I expect these 'facts' will figure in the campaign #ableg 1/x
2. It is possible that the bright lights at the War Room still go with 'the world will always need more oil' narrative, but after the treehuggers at BP, Total & the IEA all said oil's days are numbered that's a tough sell
3. They could also go with "we're the best at reducing carbon intensity", which is only convincing if you ignore that we can reduce more because carbon content is so much higher to begin with....