@TomOlsenXIX@CDNEnergyCentre 4. The War Room is paying for "issues, elections or politics" category ads on Facebook, incl trying to undermine latest IPCC scientific report on climate change by claiming that “Flawed UN report appears to have an apocalypse bias”. Climate is a top issue of concern for voters
@TomOlsenXIX@CDNEnergyCentre 5. The War Room has also been sending emails about the IPCC report under the heading of “Misinformation Watch”
@TomOlsenXIX@CDNEnergyCentre 6. On August 20 (after the start of the federal election campaign), the War Room sent an email urging people to share CEC materials on social media under the false claim that “Canada is already meeting its climate objectives.”
@TomOlsenXIX@CDNEnergyCentre 7. On August 27, it was a post attacking both the federal $170/tonne carbon tax and the Clean Fuel Standard – issues which clearly differentiate between political parties in #elxn44
@TomOlsenXIX@CDNEnergyCentre 8. Last week, the (Liberal) $170/tonne carbon tax was again featured in a targeted appeal to Ontarians.
@TomOlsenXIX@CDNEnergyCentre 9. All of this comes as the War Room is recruiting an ad agency to run next year’s $5M+ ad campaign designed to build a pro-oil social movement
@TomOlsenXIX@CDNEnergyCentre 10. This would all be fair game for a provincial government, but the CEC is a provincially-funded, arms-length corporation (with only UCP Cabinet ministers on its board). So shouldn't the War Room register as a 3rd party and report like everyone else? #ableg#cdnpoli#elxn44
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2. It all started with the War Room’s Netflix/Bigfoot petition alerting me to fact that @CDNEnergyCentre was running petitions. Why, I wondered, was a publicly-funded comms outfit gathering names & postal codes like a political party?
3. The War Room is funded thru tax revenues but was set up as a separate corporation with 3 UCP Cabinet ministers on board of directors to TRY to shield it from Freedom of Information requests (more on that later).
Today's Supreme Court decision is a victory not just for the carbon tax. It recognizes climate change as a threat to Peace, Order & Good Government & lays out a roadmap for the federal govt to set minimum standards that provinces can exceed but not undercut.
2. Constitutionally, who could do what on climate was always a bit fuzzy resulting in lowest-common #cdnpoli denominator policies. By calling the question, Premiers Ford, Moe & Kenney have ultimately strengthened the federal government's hand in future battles over climate policy
3. So a win for the feds, but it also takes away one of their main excuses for more aggressive climate policy (need for oil industry-captured provinces to agree). We will hold them to that, while turning up the heat on provincial laggards.
2. It started as a comedy - who among us didn't laugh as the (misleading) anti-carbon tax stickers literally came unstuck due to cheap glue? I mean, what does Doug 'Deco Labels and Tags' Ford know about stickers anyway?
3. Then it morphed into a satire of the courtroom procedural, as the Ford government’s expert witness tried to defend not including any info on the rebates on the grounds that Ontarians are too stupid to grasp anything more complicated than a bumper sticker slogan
Re-upping this in light of news that Alberta's Energy War Room is gearing back up with an expensive new ad campaign, because I expect these 'facts' will figure in the campaign #ableg 1/x
2. It is possible that the bright lights at the War Room still go with 'the world will always need more oil' narrative, but after the treehuggers at BP, Total & the IEA all said oil's days are numbered that's a tough sell
3. They could also go with "we're the best at reducing carbon intensity", which is only convincing if you ignore that we can reduce more because carbon content is so much higher to begin with....
War Room Fact #1: "Oil and gas is the largest subsector of Canada's economy, accounting for $221 billion, or 10.6% of nominal GDP in 2018. Source: Natural Resources Canada"
Correct fact, according to NRCAN: O&G is 5.6% nrcan.gc.ca/science-data/d…
It's fair to say Energy (including electricity, related construction & other) is 10.6% of GDP but the claim is that O&G alone is 10.6% yet cited source clearly states it's 5.6% #ableg
1. Lessons for #cdnpoli from the ruthless capitalists at BlackRock, the biggest investment firm in the world: "The evidence on climate risk is compelling investors to reassess core assumptions about modern finance...." blackrock.com/corporate/inve…
2. Coal divestment = 1st step: "bc capital markets pull future risk forward, we will see changes in capital allocation more quickly than we see changes to the climate itself. In the near future – & sooner than most anticipate – there will be a significant reallocation of capital"
3. It's not about being nice: "Our investment conviction is that sustainability- and climate-integrated portfolios can provide better risk-adjusted returns to investors." Some concrete steps BlackRock is taking (whether @jkenney likes it or not)