1. Meta data of this document shows creation date Jan 12, 2021, after the attack. I would not trust anything they gave me. This could be a sanitized document that removed the evidence of agreement to the violent attack that is the element I have not seen in any of the evidence.
https://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrote/status/1468966816831586306
2. The only thing I would trust are documents taken from images of the hard drives. If from clouds, I would want to see the logs. In particular, I would look for deleted and modified documents. What these subpoenas may have inadvertently done is give the conspiracy the road map
3. to what they needed to officiate or destroy. The conspiracy would have likely hired a firm to examine the drives. That's who I would be looking for. The good news is that if they were on a cloud the DOJ may have the images and logs. And the Committee is just an lure to
4. get the #nitwitcoup to commit multiple 18 USC 1001 false statements that can be proven with the authentic images. Easy to prove in a jury and not related to any political crime. Just lying. Stacking multiple counts gets the crew looking at a long stretch and this kind of plan
5. might be why they all just suddenly stopped complying with the subpoenas. Again, this is analysis not fact reporting. I would never trust an electronic document given to me by a scoundrel.
6. That didn't take long. Also, I would not trust the one they just turned over unless it says they were planning violence. To declare and emergency there had to be violence that was part of the plan.
https://twitter.com/hugolowell/status/1469487780816474115?s=20
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
