I'm often VERY critical of right-winger Andrew Neil.
Agree or not with so-called 'vaccine passports', this article is measured & rational - but the Mail changed the word 'penalise' to 'punish' imho simply to drive clicks & outrage.
Antivaxxers are now inevitably attacking Neil.
Agree or not, here's a brief summary of points made by Neil:
Vaccine passports became mandatory in France in August for cinemas, museums, restaurants, theatres, bars, nightclubs, planes & long-distance trains.
At first there was some pushback, now it's just part of the routine.
It's not foolproof. Nothing is. People who have been vaccinated can still contract & pass on the virus.
Vaccination substantially reduces the risk of serious illness & hospitalisation
The more people who are vaccinated the better the chance we all have of beating this virus.
In France, vaccine scepticism was initially rampant but the week after Macron announced the vaccine-passport policy, 3.7 million people booked to get their jabs.
France has caught up with UK & has vaccinated more citizens with one jab than Britain.
There are 5 million unvaccinated British adults, who endanger not just themselves but the rest of us.
If they contract Covid, it is they who will put the biggest strain on the #NHS, denying the rest of us with serious non-Covid ailments the treatment that is our right.
The small number of people who, for medical reasons, cannot be vaccinated can be exempted & helped with regular testing
But for the rest it's selfish not to be vaccinated. We all have a responsibility to act in ways that don't just protect our own health but also that of others.
Neil is not in favour of compulsory vaccination.
He disagrees with Greece, which plans to fine all those over 60 who refuse to be jabbed 100 euros (£85) a month from mid-January until they agree to be vaccinated.
Neil also disagrees with Austria, which is back in full lockdown, & planning to fine adult refuseniks of any age, starting at £3,075 & rising to £6,150.
Neil rejects the view of those who claim this is 'an egregious assault on our freedoms'.
Neil says "Liberty is not the same as unbridled licence to do what you want, which is the road to anarchy" (or, I would add, the road to right-wing libertarian's 'free-market Utopia').
Neil says 'liberty for all involves a balance between rights & responsibilities'.
'My right to visit certain African countries is balanced by my responsibility to be inoculated for yellow. You cannot practice medicine without being vaccinated against hepatitis B.'
Neil thinks everybody working on the front line in the #NHS & social care should be vaccinated as a condition of employment, as they will be from next April.
He says the unvaccinated are making more restrictions on our lives inevitable. It is time we imposed some on them.
Neil says "In a free society the unvaccinated have a right not be jabbed. But they need to realise that right comes with consequences, which will inhibit their freedoms as they constrain ours."
"Singapore has decided that the unvaccinated who end up in hospital with Covid will have to foot their own medical bills.
I doubt we'd ever go that far. But you can see the logic — even the morality — of it.
By all means exercise your rights. But beware of the consequences."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I was struck by this sentence, written by Andrew Neil, calling for penalties for the unvaccinated:
"I'm not impressed by those who claim this is an egregious assault on our freedoms. Liberty is not the same as unbridled licence to do what you want, which is the road to anarchy."
Functional democracies have to find the right balance between on one hand, maximum freedom for individuals, & on the other, sensible measures to protect decent people from those who would cheat, lie, exploit, manipulate or use violence or intimidation to satisfy their desires.
Over recent decades, the Right has lurched toward 'free-market libertarianism', of the kind that reduces the influence of the state on economic matters, yet increases the repressive power of the state by abandoning rules, rights & regulations designed to protect citizens.
In October 2004, she became the only @UKLabour MP who openly supported the re-election of dimwit warmonger George W. Bush, arguing "you know where you stand with George and, in today's world, that's much better than rudderless leaders who drift with the prevailing wind".
She wrote that a victory for Democratic Party challenger, John Kerry, would prompt "victory celebrations among those who want to destroy liberal democracies. More terrorists and suicide bombers would step forward to become martyrs in their quest to destroy the West".
Un-policed & often unenforceable anti-corruption laws have made the UK the global money-laundering capital for a post-Soviet elite, severely damaging Britain’s international reputation & the rule of law.
House of Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle has promised to raise allegations of drug use in Parliament with the Met Police, after traces of cocaine had been found in several lavatory areas.
The Government estimates that last year there were around 300,000 opiate or crack users in England, & around one million people using cocaine per year.
The latest ONS figures for England suggest that one in 11 adults aged 16 to 59 years took a drug in the year to March 2020.
Did you know that on December 5th 1921, the English Football Association (FA) passed a resolution BANNING women's football matches from being played in their stadiums?
To mark the 100th anniversary, the delayed Women's #FACup Final is taking place at Wembley Stadium TODAY, as part of a day celebrating the women's game that their organization stymied for 50 years.
Women's football was incredibly popular prior to the ban.
At the time of the ban in 1921, women's football in England was thriving, in no small part due to the all-conquering Preston-based team 'Dick, Kerr Ladies FC', who played matches raising money for charitable causes, & frequently drew five-figure crowds.