With #Omicron rapidly spreading nationwide, I am concerned about all the members of our communities with damage and injury in the immune system, particularly to cell-mediated injury (to T cells and Ab-producing cells). In neutralization studies, most monoclonal Abs used to date
2/ have lost activity to #Omicron and are no longer useful in areas with high attack rates (pretty much everywhere in US right now). There are two possible exceptions. The first is #sotrovimab which was originally isolated from an individual with
3/ #SARSCoV1 (not a typo) back in 2003. The Ab recognizes a conserved glycan motif at the base of the Spike protein (away from the ACE-2 receptor-binding domain). Extremely limited supplies and fairly narrow emergency use authorization, as follows:
4/ Limitations of Authorized Use.
• Sotrovimab is not authorized for use in patients:
o who are hospitalized due to COVID-19, OR
o who require oxygen therapy due to COVID-19, OR
o who require an increase in baseline oxygen flow rate due to COVID-19 (in those on chronic oxygen
5/ therapy due to underlying non-COVID-19 related comorbidity).
• Benefit of treatment with sotrovimab has not been observed in patients hospitalized due to COVID-19. (Copied from the EUA)
6/ The second mAb which may retain activity against #OmicronVariant is Tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld). The EUA stipulates use only for prophylaxis, but NOT for post-exposure prophylaxis, as follows, in the follwoing patients > 12 yo:
7/ • Who are NOT currently infected with SARS-CoV-2 and who have not had a known recent exposure to an individual infected with SARS-CoV-2 and
• Who have moderate to severe immune compromise due to a medical condition or receipt of immunosuppressive medications or treatments
8/ and may not mount an adequate immune response
to COVID-19 vaccination or
• For whom vaccination with any available COVID-19 vaccine, according to the approved or authorized schedule, is not recommended due to a history of severe adverse reaction
9/ There is a clear gap between these different EUAs. There is no coverage for post-exposure prophylaxis with either agent. In addition, neither agent is indicated for patients in hospital with #COVID19. The situation may change rapidly. In the meantime, dexamethasone and
10/ remdesivir remain treatment options. In addition, we are eagerly awaiting news on paxlovid (which is Spike protein/variant agnostic based on mechanism on action). The goal is to limit morbidity among vulnerable patients @sloan_kettering and around the world. You can do your
The question is how this observation translates to a real-world prophylaxis setting - given the increase in IC50, will the duration of protection (6 months) be negatively impacted? Important questions as prepare to administer to vulnerable
1/ I'm really excited that the @US_FDA has granted an EUA for #Paxlovid - this is a terrific new option for #OmicronVariant and kudos to the scientists, researchers, and developers at Pfizer. So timely, and so necessary as we face a wave of new #COVID19 infections globally.
2/ I went through the fact sheet and it is critical to highlight that many patients with cancer and organ transplant recipients are on medications that will be effected by the #ritonavir component of #paxlovid.
3/ Note black box warning - Co-administration of ritonavir with sedative hypnotics, anti-arrthythmics, or ergot alkaloids are contraindicated.
Pfizer did a great job in compiling potential drug-drug interactions:
then NY Hospitals would have acted differently to his prior order of "Use it or Lose it, and Get Fined", issued on January 4, 2021. At this time, hospitals were NOT allowed to vaccinate patients, even though many were clamoring to do so. (2/n)
As a consequence, it is not surprising (and entirely predictable based on the incentive created by @NYGovCuomo) that many academic medical centers vaccinated lower-risk and non-patient facing staff, as outlined today in the @nytimes by @apoorva_nyc (3/n) nytimes.com/video/us/polit…
1/n I read this article with tremendous interest and have some comments on this situation. Why are we in this situation? Conflicting forces are driving the vaccination process. At Elite Medical Centers, Even Workers Who Don’t Qualify Are Vaccinated nytimes.com/2021/01/10/hea…
2/n @sloan_kettering there was a deliberative and transparent process to identify and prioritize vaccination among patient-facing healthcare workers. However, hospitals in NY State were not yet allowed to offer vaccine to high-risk patients. Vaccine uptake is not uniform
3/n among priority patient-facing vaccine groups and since substantial financial repercussions were threatened if the vaccine was not administered very rapidly, this created an incentive to administer vaccine to other (lower risk) workers at academic medical centers. Remember
Concerned about the #COVID19 vaccines and autoimmune disease?
Both the #Moderna and #Pfizer vaccines do not contain an attenuated virus or instructions (via mRNA) to make viral particles that could replicate in vaccine recipients. (1/n)
I have psoriatic arthritis (on #methotrexate for about a decade) and had no hesitation to receive the vaccine @sloan_kettering. I am fortunate and was able to stop methotrexate for one month prior - this is atypical for most patients with autoimmune diseases - and will (2/n)
resume the medication a month after the second shot. I stress that this is not a medical recommendation for other patients with psoriatic arthritis or any other autoimmune disease. Patients should discuss how treatments for autoimmune conditions may impact vaccine immunity (3/n)
1/n Much will be made about this case report. I am very pleased that the patient did well and survived #COVID19 after a difficult course. On the heels of tweeting about anti IL-6 therapy (tocilizumab) I'm taking a stab at this case report. ashpublications.org/bloodadvances/…
2/n It is a purely correlative, observational study. The title is misleading though. An alternate, equally valid title would be: First case of COVID-19 in a patient with multiple myeloma successfully treated with methylprednisolone. The patient received corticosteroid (MP)
3/n therapy on five consecutive days (day +2 to day +6). On day +9 the patient received tocilizumab. He continued to improve and was released from the hospital 10 days later. Did tocilizumab cause this improvement? It is impossible to tell. However, I conclude that it is safe to
1/n I am thinking about the various modes of #COVID19 transmission. Although not common, gastrointestinal symptoms are routinely reported by COVID patients. In humans, the SARS-CoV2 receptor ACE2 is not only found in alveolar epithelial cells (lung), but also in cells that line
2/n the small intestine, among other sites (heart and kidneys). Humans shed high levels of #COVID19 in the stool, a finding that raised the question whether fecal-oral transmission may occur. This would be very relevant for measures to limit the spread of disease.
3/n The concern for fecal-oral transmission is clearly outlined in this review. nature.com/articles/s4157…