The Christmas gifts keep on coming as the Fail publishes judge’s ruling in #MeghanMarkle’s legal win. 🎁
“The #DuchessOfSussex wins her legal case for copyright infringement against Associated Newspapers for articles published in the Mail on Sunday and posted on Mail Online”
“The #DuchessOfSussex wins her legal case for copyright infringement against Associated Newspapers for articles published in the Mail on Sunday and posted on Mail Online”
I’d say this puts the kibosh on any Supreme Court appeal from ANL. But by running the statement at the bottom of the page instead of in a front page box ANL is testing the judge’s requirement for prominence. I’d love to see Justice Warby force them to print it again.
The judge required ANL to print a “short report” of his decision not an apology. Although Meghan won her privacy claim,admitting invasion of privacy wasn’t part of the required statement. The judge designated the exact copy & that it should be on the front pg in 17pt Gotham Bold.
The notice that #MeghanMarkleWon has also been printed on page 3 of the paper. #DailyFail #MeghanMarkle
https://twitter.com/scobie/status/1474888110605541381
The notice says that financial remedies have been agreed to. That’s news to me. The information from the last High Court ruling was that the process to determine damages had been agreed to but not the amount of damages. 🤔
The front page and page 3 notices of #MeghanMarkle’s victory over ANL have been published in the Mail on Sunday. #MeghanMarkleWon her copyright infringement and invasion of privacy claims. Damages have been agreed but not publicly announced.
The notice of #MeghanMarkle’s legal win against ANL has also been published in the MailOnline. It must remain prominently displayed online for 6 days at which point it will be archived. #MeghanMarkleWon #DailyFail
https://twitter.com/anna_itsonlyme/status/1474897706959134722
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
