Assuming you have $SOL sitting somewhere and you do not wish to sell it, but want to hold it and maximize yield, here is one thing that currently works like an endless #yield loop:
2) take your $mSOL and $scnSOL (the token you receive in exchange for staking) and deposit them as collateral on @solendprotocol receiving additional 1.8% yield on those
3) borrow $SOL from solend, which is being subsidized with $SLND rewards and has a NEGATIVE borrow cost of 5%
4) take the $SOL you just borrowed and rinse / repeat steps 1-3 above as many times as you dare
5) take the final $SOL (after the last repetition you dare to do) and deposit them as collateral on @TulipProtocol for an additional yield of 5.5%
Assuming you dare to do steps 1-3 5x, you should end up somewhere between 60-70% annualized yield on your $SOL. You can dare to go higher or choose to go lower of course.
Why does this work? Because currently, solend is subsidizing activity on their lending platform.
Essentially you are being paid a reward in $SLND token that is higher than the cost to borrow $SOL, so that, once you have collateral on the platform, you can borrow the $SOL "for free" or even earn a bit on the same assets and rinse-repeat this.
So when does this stop working?
Simple - when the price of $SLND token falls to a point where the rewards no longer subsidize borrowing (about -50% from today) OR the platform decides to stop the incentivation as they have accumulated enough TVL.
Risks you need to be aware of:
- every platform mentioned above carries smart contract risk. Your assets can be hacked and you lose everything
- a rapid decline in SLND price coupled with an unability for whatever reason to unwind the positions
- unstaking of mSOL&scnSOL is tied to liquidity in SOL/stakedtoken, which is not covering 100% of assets supplied, ie there could be a run so you'd have to wait the 7 days or so for actual unstaking of SOL
- Interest rate changes between the platforms
- $SLND reward lock monthly
None of this is advice. It is just a small excursion into the power of #DeFi to illustrate what it can do. Remember, the platform (@solendprotocol) is essentially rewarding you with their governance token, so it is as if your bank paid you with their stock for borrowing with them
Obviously that can dilute the value of their stock, but the $SLND token is limited to 100m token. So as long as that number does not increase (in the case of a bank stock, they'd just to a capital increase), there is no actual dilution.
The fully-diluted market cap of $SLND itself right now is about $400m. A common way to value this is to compare it to TVL ($1bn) and this does not stick out as paticularly overvalued vs other protocols on a fully-diluted basis. So there is some hope the token would retain value.
Again: this is not advice. I can miss risks in these writeups and I am by no means saying you should do any of this. It also means you remain fully exposed to any price changes in the $SOL token itself. Still, maybe it is useful.
Should probably add 2 things:
- there is a limit to this (its not “endless” as you can only borrow 80% each step)
- there is risk of liquidation if prices of mSOL & scnSOL diverge strongly (ie go down 15% more) from SOL. Unlikely but possible
Last but not least, I use 10% of my SOL this way. There are way too many risks for me to do it with more, but it is still very worthwhile. Assuming the rest is staked it brings annual yield to c 12%. Not advice.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I am getting to a point where I cannot take #crypto haters seriously anymore:
- Coins with governance and revenue rights to a smart contracts aren’t scams. They are decentralized ownership aka equity
- It may seem absurd to have a start up valued at $100m fully-diluted but…
… that’s the point - “fully” diluted implies there will not be future (stock) issuance, so this number compares to maybe 5m$ valuation of a classic equity start up that will raise multiple rounds issuing new stock in the future
- #tether was not backed in 2017 and…
… very clearly was a criminal enterprise then. If only just for money laundering rules. But that should/will hit the people in charge. Pretending “tether isn’t backed” today and misinterpreting every other print because it fits your narrative is just dumb. Are they…
I have thought about it enough. Jack and friends dislike #web3 because it doesn’t have copyright protections (yet) and it threatens to break the decade old model of natural monopolies forming on the web once a firm has sufficient mass in an area.
It is true that VCs get great deals in #crypto atm & it is also true some try to flip quickly. But it is also undeniably true that people who participate in #web3 own a far larger share of it than in the case of web2.0. Airdrops alone are often 4figs+ & you control your data.
Look at what happened across #crypto: mainstays like bittrex, poloniex, bitmex and even uniswap to a degree already are rapidly replaced when a better product comes along, sometimes by people forking their code. Of course, if you are in web 2.0 you are scared as fck.
Picked up a number of under performing, high quality protocols along with some of the most strongest recently, hedged it with low quality stuff. I think we are at the point where things are so low sentiment-wise it’s difficult not to see a pop. Low qual hedges will help otherwise
Too tired to provide more reasoning, but should echo my previous few posts
This is a part of the story. Lot’s of room with this and funding to squeeze shorts.
FWIW I am in the latter category. I think both traditional markets and crypto need to shake off the fact liquidity will reduce, but the underlying drivers (economy, virus clean up, innovation) are going to win out at the end.
Separation based on utility needs to happen though. As long as memecoins are 1:1 correlated with actual working projects, #wangmi long term. But I am optimistic it will happen.
So the Nasdaq Bearishly engulfed the Fed relief rally, which makes it look more and more like a short squeeze. The S&P wasn’t quite as bad, but the picture isn’t pretty for risk assets. Unless we turn around quickly, this could mean stocks are in for more pain.
As I said before, I think that crypto as a whole has become a risk asset like all others, meaning that I find it hard to see that crypto rallies extensively but stocks don’t. So therefore unless stocks recover quickly my stance will be cautious.
In an ideal world, we can get a de-coupling between $BTC and productive alts (those with actual network usage, like $ETH & $SOL). The latter have been much stronger on this rebound so that is a good start, but I am not convinced.
No, really, this isn't pretty, neither on the weekly, nor the daily. Deviation up, back into channel, now sitting at the bottom of it... This isn't trivial support. This is quite an important level. Not sure it can hold, but we can pray.
Be sure to keep praying please. We‘ll need all of the gods.