@trussliz@MarosSefcovic@ManufacturingNI@FT Since July the number of @ManufacturingNI members "struggling" with the protocol has dropped below 25pc...compared to more than 40pc in July. It's moving in the right direction, it seems./2
@trussliz@MarosSefcovic@ManufacturingNI@FT The survey, to be published Friday, also shows EU suppliers are getting easier (last year it seemed that many hadn't got full message that Northern Ireland is part of EU single market for goods) and trade with GB has also picked up/3
@trussliz@MarosSefcovic@ManufacturingNI@FT As @ManufacturingNI boss Stephen Kelly @Big_Kells tells me, business still wants some refinements/easements -- and that means both EU and UK moving -- but equally business IS getting on with an imperfect deal. And there are upsides for some/4
@trussliz@MarosSefcovic@ManufacturingNI@FT@Big_Kells Interestingly the number of firms saying their NI-GB trade was hit is down from a third to a fifth. The number of those reporting positive impact on business from Protocol is up to 20% from 6% in July./5
@trussliz@MarosSefcovic@ManufacturingNI@FT@Big_Kells And as EU exports to GB get harder with new controls, there's chance that actually NI starts to pick up business further as a result of the Protocol giving them a foot in both EU and UK internal markets /6
@trussliz@MarosSefcovic@ManufacturingNI@FT@Big_Kells This is not to say that Protocol is all fine and dandy -- its a headache, as we know for food companies particularly -- but this data does point to business adapting. And worth recalling that manufacturing had many less easements than others/7
@trussliz@MarosSefcovic@ManufacturingNI@FT@Big_Kells The data are also a reminder that the discussion about the Protocol should be anchored in the real world; not where bits of the UK Govt (and ERG) and sections of Unionist politics have got themselves. I can see why they bitterly regret the deal, but it was the agreed solution/8
@trussliz@MarosSefcovic@ManufacturingNI@FT@Big_Kells The biz community definitely wants to make it work, and even though the discussion is now focussing in on the border technical issues, the reality is that both sides are quite a long way apart. The UK still wants to fundamentally reverse the burdens of the deal/9
@trussliz@MarosSefcovic@ManufacturingNI@FT@Big_Kells But given that a lot of the upsides seen in data above comes from being in EU single market for goods, there's a limit (EU officials say repeatedly) to what the EU can do, legally and politically./10
@trussliz@MarosSefcovic@ManufacturingNI@FT@Big_Kells So even aiming off for a bit of political poetic licence, Truss's "no checks" on goods going GB-NI is in a different space to Sefco's offer of 50pc reduction in customs/80pc SPS, taking full Protocol as base/11
@trussliz@MarosSefcovic@ManufacturingNI@FT@Big_Kells It will be hard -- must be a chance it gets scrappy, but both sides back away from ultimate confrontation and it all rumbles on. Hope that's wrong, but feels that only solution, for now, is for time and space to settle it down. ENDS
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Peretz @GeorgePeretzQC opens with point that new U.K. system does have more flex than EU - either block exemption or getting permission from EU Commission.
But flip side is less certainty for granting authorities, which might retard grants /2
One big point here is that we’re still waiting for quite a lot of detail on how the system will be operated and monitored in practice, including the CAT tribunal/JR system. /3
🚨🇪🇺🇬🇧🚛🚛🚛🚛🇬🇧🇪🇺🚨Regional ports fear unfair #Brexit advantage for Channel rivals…my latest via @FT /1 on.ft.com/31lSF7A
@FT This relates to how the UK government will price its inland inspection sites (at Sevington in Kent and elsewhere) for when physical inspections come into force in July...the Channel Ports (Dover, Folkestone) had not space so didn't have to build border control posts/2
@FT Other UK ports were given £200m through Port Infrastructure Fund to build BCPs (which was a 65% subsidiy in effect) but Major Ports Group chair Charles Hammond tells me regional ports fear there won't be a level playing field /3
🚨🚨🇪🇺🇬🇧🚛🚛🚛🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨What did you do this Christmas? Lot of small and micro businesses spent it preparing for new post-#Brexit import controls that start Jan 1… GVMS, Rules of Origin proofs, non-deferred customs declarations… etc my latest via @FT /1 on.ft.com/3Jqcnk0
@FT This relates to new controls on imports FROM the EU into the UK, which delayed for a year by the UK government after Jan 1 2021 in order to keep trade flowing into the UK.
In short this is the 'other' side of #brexit .../2
@FT It will apply similar controls as the EU has...so from Jan 1 2021, UK importers will need
a) to complete and clear customs declarations in 'real time' when importing; so no 175 day deferral period
b) for animal products register them on IPAFFs, the UK food import register /3
🚨🚨🇬🇧🇪🇺☕️🚛⚙️✈️🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨#Brexit means Brexit. Or if you’re a small company trading into the EU, it means setting up in Netherlands; or if a haulier, giving up on EU business; or fighting to trade with NI.
So starting with Hampstead Teas, run by Kiran Tawadey which sells probiotic teas across the UK, EU and rest of world
On Jan 1 she is shutting down her small Milton Keynes blending and packing plant. Five jobs will go. It's now "too complicated" to run. /2
She already moved her distribution to the Netherlands, so now she can import into EU with single large shipments, clear customs and VAT once and then freely distribute to EU 27.
And now her Oz and Japanese customers want supplying out of the EU also /3
Quick thought on @trussliz appointment to #brexit file is that it’s in principle a ‘good thing’ that it’s back in Foreign Office. Brexit should be seen in context of wider EU relations. Too often it hasn’t.
BUT it will be challenging for her politically…/1
Because as we know the right of the Tory party is in revolt and @DavidGHFrost spent a lot of time pandering to them.
Just three months ago they were being promised Article 16, mutual enforcement and the eradication of the internal border Boris built/2
Frost essentially promised in his Command paper to unwind that mistake. Go back to 2019, mutual enforcement, technology…basically wishing the Irish Trilemma away.
Now he’s walked off, he’ll be there, saying “if only”…usual Brexiter dreaming /3
🚨🚨🇬🇧🇪🇺⚗️🧪👩🔬🥼🧪⚗️👩🔬🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨Post-#Brexit chemicals regime risks UK being a “dumping ground” for toxic substances, warn environmental groups. My @ft latest.
@FT So. This relates to UK chemical regulation after Brexit.
You'll recall that as an EU member the UK followed the EU REACH regulation for chemicals. But after #Brexit we're setting up our own version.
As of Jan 1, we've been free to diverge from EU rules/2
@FT And in one area -- substances of 'very high concern' or SVHCs -- it is now clear that the UK is going to diverge and take a different approach from the EU.
How do we know this? Well, very quietly the UK government slipped out a notice last week. Here/3.