Yogi Jaeger Profile picture
Jan 19 23 tweets 5 min read
The current #COVID19 media coverage around me seems to agree on three things: (1) there is nothing we can do against #omicron, (2) this variant is mild & the wave will be over soon, (3) we're soon going "endemic," to "live with the virus," & back to normality. /1
There seems to be very little push-back against this narrative, which is something that really surprises me. But worse than that: it does *not* bode well for the next pandemic (whether the next #COVID19 variant or something altogether more worrisome). /2
Re (1): we can't do anything & #ZeroCovid was never an option.

Well, we never really tried. Those few countries that did were isolated (either geographically or surrounded by countries who didn't implement any low-incidence measures). /3
There is so much criticism out there that "measures don't work," which ignores a simple fact: most country never implemented the right kind of measures at the right time. We can take Austria as a prime example: compared to Swtizerland, its death toll was on the same order... /4
... despite drastic differences in measures like lock-downs, school closures, pressure on unvaccinated people etc. Therefore, we conclude that measures are ineffective. This is totally wrong. /5
First of all: Austria's measures always came too late (lockdowns), were lifted to early (mask mandates), or were never really implemented (the infamous lockdown for the unvaccinated). Of course, this sort of half-assed "implement measures to appear to be doing something" .... /6
... didn't work. It was more political theater by a gang of useless irresponsible politicians who were/are more interested in message control than in public health. Also, the main focus in Austria was always on keeping mass tourism going, which acted as massive superspreader. /7
When the next pandemic comes, we'd better be prepared to lock down early, shut down global travel & learn that successful measures prevent cases (instead to concluding that they were not necessary since there were no casse after all). /8
My conclusion: in this regard, we have learned absolutely nothing. If there is a more severe pandemic coming down the line, we'll be just marginally more prepared than we were for #COVID19. This may, quite literally, be fatal for humanity. /9
Re (2): it's mild & soon over.

The cynicism behind this is just baffling to me. There are millions of high-risk people on this planet that are acutely threatened by this "mild" disease, many children among them. We are sacrificing the vulnerable for our convenience. /10
Frankly, I wind the most troubling aspect of how we "deal" with the pandemic. Not having to change anything, not sacrificing even the slightest comfort, seems to be more important than to protect the vulnerable. That is a frightening amount of egotism. /11
The same could be seen internationally: each country for itself. Once we are able to get our shots & boosters, we do not worry about the world's poor. They have never interested us. The problem: of course, we can't get rid of the virus this way. /12
Even worse, we probably won't go "endemic" with it for quite some while. Letting it rip, at home or elsewhere, increases the chances of new variants arising. Selection is effective in proportion to population size. We're currently helping the virus evolve. /13
And all those "experts" telling you about the evolutionary potential of the virus? They don't know what they are talking about. I am an evolutionary biologist & I can tell you that we have no idea how this virus is going to evolve next. No idea. /14
So: keeping incidences low worldwide should be our top-most priority. Instead, we hear bullshit about how #omicron is nothing but a poor-man's vaccine really & our exit out of the pandemic. Which brings me to the last point. /15
Re (3): we're going endemic.

Now that's just a word most people don't understand. And politicians use it in a way which is simply not correct: to live with the virus means that case numbers & long-term consequences are under control. We can't "go endemic" in the middle of... /16
... the biggest wave of infection so far. That's just crazy talk. As I said before, there is no guarantee that we won't have additional waves. This virus is not yet under control. The pandemic is unlikely to be over soon. /17
To "live with the virus" we cannot go back to the old normal. We need to get used to new ways of behaving in crowds & public spaces, we need better infrastructure (air filters, new building techniques, etc), we need more responsible interactions. We can never go back. /18
What this pandemic has revealed to me is that "normality" was crap before the pandemic. Our society was dominated by neurotic egotistical narcissism. What the pandemic should teach us is that we can't survive without taking care of each other. /19
Your individual freedom ends where other people's freedom & health start. Anything else is just childish egotism.

It's maddening that this simple message does not come through. The media have failed us in a big way here. /20
But this goes beyond media: we need to re-learn what it means to be human if we want to live in a complex interdependent society. Instead, the tribal instincts this society caters to are from a pre-modern age. They are not able to cope with the modern world. /21
There is no way back: we can either grow up as a species, or we can perish, because our behavior, cognitive abilities, and social codes were not able to keep up with the complexification of our society. It's as simple as that. /22
Addendum: always interesting to see how the troll armies are triggered after a certain amount of mentions of a tweet. Be warned: I block liberally. Not interested in wasting my time with trolls or idiots.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yogi Jaeger

Yogi Jaeger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @yoginho

Feb 19, 2021
Our second paper on dynamical modularity, "Dynamical Modules in Metabolism, Cell and Developmental Biology" by @NickMonk14 & myself is now available as a preprint: osf.io/rydbn via @OSFramework /1
It complements our earlier evolutionary perspective on the subject (osf.io/vfz4t) with its more regulation-based approach and a long list of practical examples that illustrate our novel conceptual framework for the dynamical decomposition of complex systems. /2
Just like our earlier paper, the argument starts with the following observation: modular phenotypic traits imply that the underlying regulatory processes—the epigenotype of the organism—must be dissociable as well. How to decompose them, however, is not a trivial task. /3
Read 16 tweets
Dec 13, 2020
Darwinian Gaia: the persister perspective on evolution. aeon.co/essays/the-gai… via @aeonmag
@aeonmag I think this an amazingly refreshing and interesting new view on evolution. For several reasons. What’s even more amazing is that one of the best evolutionary biologists today has completely transformed his view of evolution in light of new evidence. How rarely does this happen?
@aeonmag I have huge respect for W. Ford Doolittle to come forth with this revolutionary change of mind. So much of our field is mired in dogmatic talking past each other. This new approach is a much needed fresh breath of air!
Read 5 tweets
Nov 6, 2020
@dav_robbe I didn’t leave academia voluntarily. And I tried to get a traditional academic job back for quite a while. Stockholm syndrome, I guess. I’m also still trying to get funding for my projects. Short-term fellowships work, but no luck with bigger projects so far. /1
@dav_robbe I survive on the odd teaching job and giving workshops (e.g. a primer in philosophy for scientists). In years since I’ve left, I’ve done my best intellectual work. The lack of career constraints is unbelievably liberating. And the lack of bullshit work in committees etc. too… /2
@dav_robbe Academia is an oligarchy. The oligarchs are powerful & uninterested in change. By their own metrics, their science is doing better than ever. For me, most of it has lost all relevance. As you say, our fields are stuck in the wrong paradigm. More of the same, no thank you. /3
Read 10 tweets
Nov 5, 2020
I made the mistake of taking on a grant review in my old field of research. The first this year. Much has happened since January. And many of my priorities have changed. A few reflections. /1
After reading the grant proposal, I had to decline the review, because of an intellectual conflict of interest. The proposal was well-written, certainly not uninteresting in terms of proposals in its field, and the applicant was well qualified. /2
But for one, reading through the 30-page proposal made me viscerally sick. All the hours and effort wasted for a 10–15% funding chance. Excessive details, time planning, questions about applicability, and whatnot. All a tremendous waste of time. /3
Read 12 tweets
Sep 17, 2020
I just read another one of those “how I overcame writing anxiety and became a more productive writer” threads on #AcademicTwitter. They are a frighteningly frequent thing. A few thoughts. #StockholmSyndrome /1
This latest thread was full of very reasonable advice on how to boost your writing productivity by a researcher who published something like a dozen and a half articles and book chapters over the past year. The implicit claim is that this made them a better writer. /2
But why would you want to optimise your output like this in the first place? What kind of system makes you think this is a good thing? This cult of productivity is driving us insane & it’s also driving academic research into a corner, the corner of the low-hanging fruit. /3
Read 10 tweets
Sep 16, 2020
A business idea for these times, in which higher education is seen as a commodity, and students are treated like customers: a university modelled on #CrossFit. (And no, this is *not* about Greg Glassman’s idiotic views on COVID or racism.) #HigherEducation /1
From the point of this university “your education is just our warm-up.” Students will have to suffer (every single day) to increase their depth of thinking. Daily existential crises are part of the programme. Only this kind of learning builds sustainable cognitive muscle. /2
Cognitive nutrition will be strictly regulated. No greasy writings are part of the curriculum. Only Spartan intellectual rigour. No literary intoxication. Only Henry-Rollins style straight edge. No romantic poetry, just analytic prose. /3
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(