Fed statement (here: federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pre…) is pretty much exactly what everyone expected: No rate rise today, but we think it will "soon be appropriate" to raise rates, and bond purchases end in March.
Worth noting that the decision (which really, for now, is a decision to do nothing) was unanimous.
It's still covid's economy, and the rest of us are just spectators...
The Fed also announced principles for balance sheet reduction (ie the end of quantitative easing). No surprises here, either. federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pre…
All told, it's a pretty well signaled and orchestrated shift that will ruffle few feathers.
A key point that I see many miss: It's not at all obvious that the Fed is tightening monetary policy. Inflation has risen, which has effectively cut the interest rate that matters--the real interest rate. At this stage the Fed is leaning against this mechanical cut in real rates.
If there's any real news in today's Fed announcement, it's what the Fed didn't do. It didn't raise rates faster than it had earlier signaled.
Also, it's going to be a weird couple of months as we're soon to see the first data on the awful state of the Omicron-afflicted real economy, even as inflation has ticked up. (For crying out loud, please don't give Omicron the compliment of calling it stagflation. It's a virus.)
Here's what a Fed Chair would love to hear at a highly-contested inflection point like this: Yawn.
...As far as I can tell, that's the main reaction so far.
I normally love the Fed Statement Tracker, as it highlights the few edits made between meetings. But this time, it looks like they started from a blank sheet of paper. Like none of the words survived: graphics.wsj.com/fed-statement-…
It looks like you could say that stocks rose and fell after the Fed announcement. Or they stayed the same. Depends on your event window, really.
Fun fact: I accidentally clicked on the Fed's January *2021* statement, and the central concern at the time was that inflation was too low.
Point is, a year is a long time, and the future is hard to predict, particularly during a pandemic.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You know you're overstating the role that GDP can play as a welfare metric when you say the economy as a whole is stronger now than before the pandemic...
There are fewer jobs, more unemployment, more inflation, more government debt, more bankruptcies, worse schooling, less access to healthcare, worse mental health, greater illness and 800,000 lost souls.
This isn't political—it's the virus's fault.
But the economy ain't stronger
The lesson here is that anytime you talk about "the economy" without talking about actual people and their lives, you're inviting faulty reasoning.
The economy is us. If our lives aren't better, the economy's not better.
December payrolls report shows disappointing job growth of only +199k in December, well below expectations.
Unemployment fell a couple of ticks to 3.9%.
And revisions suggest the past couple of months were a bit better than feared.
Revisions punched November's number up from +210k to +249k, and October up from +546k to +648k. Those upward revisions -- and the prospect that December's number is likely to be revised up -- put a somewhat sunnier glow on these disappointing numbers.
Over the past three months payrolls employment has grown, on average, by +365k per month, which is okay, but not the sort of growth you might hope for.
And the past two months are consistent with a real slowdown in the recovery.
Short version of the prize: We used to dig into the data, say "correlation ain't causation," quickly forget we said that, and make a bunch of causal-ish statements based on data that really couldn't support such claims.
Then David, Josh and Guido said: Hang on.
Their response wasn't the usual destructive "we can't make causal claims" stuff, but rather entirely constructive: Here's a toolkit and set of approaches to help you make credible causal claims.
Non-farm payrolls in September rose by only +194k, after +366k last month.
The recovery has stalled.
We're missing about 8 million jobs, and at this rate, we're not bringing them back any time soon.
Slightly brighter news in the revisions: Last month's gains were revised from +235k to +366k. The previous month's gains were revised up by an additional +38k. So the prior two months were in total +169k better than we thought.
But this month is about 300k worse than we hoped.
The unemployment rate fell from 5.2% to 4.8%, but celebrations on this score would be premature, as it partly reflects the labor force shrinking by about -183k.
Household survey is slightly sunnier than the payrolls survey, showing employment growth of +526k.
Stunning new estimates suggest that the 400 wealthiest American families paid an average Federal tax rate of only 8.2%. whitehouse.gov/cea/blog/2021/…
Here’s why: 1. The rich rely on investment income, which is taxed at lower rates than labor income. 2. They pay no income tax on a big chunk of their investment income. (This is the “stepped up basis” loophole.)
This new estimate does something quite important: It analyzes a measure of income that includes unrealized capital gains. The rich earn a lot of this income, but because it’s difficult to calculate, few estimates of tax rates include it.