No matter how clear a case opposition parties or other critics of Boris Johnson & the Government make, Bannon's strategy means no single version of the truth is ever going to be accepted. This fact underscores a serious problem for our democratic culture. vox.com/policy-and-pol…
No amount of evidence, on virtually any topic, is likely to move public opinion one way or the other.
We can attribute some of this to rank partisanship — some people simply refuse to acknowledge inconvenient facts about their own side.
But there’s another problem: we live in a media ecosystem that overwhelms people with information. Some of that information is accurate, some of it is bogus, & much of it is intentionally misleading. The result is a polity that has increasingly given up on finding out the truth.
As Sabrina Tavernise & Aidan Gardiner put it in a NYT piece, “people are numb & disoriented, struggling to discern what is real in a sea of slant, fake, & fact.”
This is partly why even flagrant rule & law-breaking & obvious lies & corruption do little to move public opinion.
One response is to walk away & tune everything out - it takes time & effort to comb through the bullshit, & most people have busy lives & limited bandwidth. Another reaction is to retreat into tribal allegiances & stick to the media that feeds you the info you most want to hear.
The issue for many people isn’t exactly a denial of truth as such. It’s more a growing weariness over the process of finding the truth at all. And that weariness leads more & more people to abandon the idea that the truth is knowable, leading to a 'post-truth' reality.
The press & news media SHOULD sift fact from fiction & give the public the information it needs to make informed political choices. But if you saturate the media ecosystem with misinformation & overwhelm the media’s ability to mediate, then you can disrupt the democratic process.
What we’re facing is a new form of #propaganda that wasn’t really possible until the digital age. And it works not by creating a consensus around any particular narrative but by muddying the waters so that consensus isn’t achievable. It's mainly what the culture war is all about.
For most of recent history, the goal of propaganda was to reinforce a consistent narrative. But zone-flooding takes a different approach: it seeks to disorient audiences with an avalanche of competing stories.
It produces a certain nihilism in which people are so skeptical about the possibility of finding the truth that they give up the search.
60% of Americans say they encounter conflicting reports about the same event - so it’s not surprising trust in news media is declining.
Steve Bannon articulated the zone-flooding philosophy well, but he did not invent it. It was pioneered by Putin, who uses the media to engineer a fog of disinformation, producing just enough distrust to ensure that the public can never mobilize around a coherent narrative.
In the US, Bannon learned that flooding the zone with ridiculous (more often than not divisive culture war) stories does not necessarily persuade the public that something is true, but rather it creates a cloud of doubt around oppositional figures, narratives, actions & ideas.
Even if lies & misinformation are quickly debunked, the damage is done: right-wing media amplify the falsehoods; armies on social media - bot & real - will, too.
The mainstream press will be a step behind in debunking, & even the act of debunking will serve to amplify the lies.
George Lakoff calls this the “framing effect.” If you say “don’t think of an elephant,” you can’t help but think of an elephant. In other words, even if you reject an argument, merely repeating it cements the frame in people’s minds.
Repeated exposure to fact-checking does tend to increase the accuracy of beliefs. But the issue with 'flooding the zone with shit' is an overabundance of news, which diminishes the importance of any individual story, no matter how big or damning.
In this environment, there are too many things happening at once; it’s a constant game of whack-a-mole for journalists. False claims, if they’re repeated enough, become more plausible the more often they’re shared, something psychologists have called the “illusory truth” effect.
Our brains tend to associate repetition with truthfulness. Some interesting new research found that the more people encounter information, the more likely they are to feel justified in spreading it, whether it’s true or not.
A consequence of pervasive confusion about what’s happening is people feel more comfortable siding with their political tribe.
If everything’s up for grabs, & it’s hard to sift through competing narratives to find the truth, then there’s nothing left but culture war politics.
There’s “us” & “them": the possibility of persuasion is off the table. We're left with a febrile media environment of competing narratives - those with the most reach & resources are able to most effectively 'flood the zone', adding to the general atmosphere of doubt & confusion.
Think of zone-flooding less as a strategy deployed by a person or group & more as a consequence of the way media works. We don’t need a master puppeteer: the race for content & the need for clicks, is more than enough. Feeding nonsense into the system divides & confuses everyone.
A ridiculous culture war story, a dangerous COVID claim or an unhinged announcement by a Government Minister can dictate an entire news cycle at the drop of a hat.
The media cycle is easily commandeered by misinformation, innuendo, & outrageous content.
These are problems because of the norms that govern journalism & because the political economy of media makes it hard to ignore or dispel bullshit stories. This is a significant problem & unfortunately, a solution is nowhere in sight. Even more divisive channels are on their way.
The instinct of the mainstream press has always been to conquer lies by exposing them. But it’s just not that simple. There are too many claims to debunk & too many conflicting narratives: the decision to cover something is a decision to amplify it &, in some cases, normalize it.
Nearly all of the incentives driving media militate against rethinking (news) media. The diagnosis is easier than the cure. Liberal democracy can't function without a shared understanding of reality. As long as the zone is flooded with shit, shared understanding is impossible.
This thread is taken from this article, with some relatively minor adaptations made to focus on the contemporary UK context.
In 2017, Boris Johnson met Steve Bannon in the US, Bannon met with Jacob Rees-Mogg in London & in 2018, Bannon met with Michael Gove, & then 'flooding the zone with (culture war) shit' escalated.
This was before GB "News". Murdoch's talkTV launches soon.
New research into public attitudes to democracy in the UK shows integrity is valued above all other traits in a politician.
When asked which traits politicians should have, “being honest” came top, followed by “owning up when they make mistakes”. ucl.ac.uk/constitution-u…
When respondents were asked to “imagine that a future prime minister has to choose between acting honestly & delivering the policy that most people want”, 71% chose honesty & only 16% delivery.
When asked if they agreed more that “healthy democracy requires that politicians always act within the rules” or that “healthy democracy means getting things done, even if that sometimes requires politicians to break the rules”, 75% chose the former & just 6% the latter.
I wonder why rule-breaking, Ministerial-Code-breaking, Human-Rights-hating, antidemocratic-law-introducing liars Boris Johnson & Priti Patel are so keen to demonise lawyers & undermine the legal system? 🧐
I'd been in two minds about JP, but after his #bbcqt performance a few weeks ago where he put air quotes around the word "racism", & now amplifying absurdly simplistic clickbait shit from the Mail with the word 'murderous', it's clear he's an arrogant attention-seeking prick.
'Critical race theory' is a theory critical of racism.
NOW do you understand why only 'certain types' strongly object to it?
Ironically, those MOST intolerant of #CRT are often the most vocal about free speech & most critical of the supposed 'intolerance' of the Left!
Critical race theory is an academic sub-discipline, loosely organized a framework of legal analysis, based on the premise that race is not a 'natural' feature of physically distinct subgroups, but a culturally invented category, often used to oppress & exploit people of colour.
The overwhelming consensus in modern science is that 'race' is a 'social construct' - an identity which is assigned based on rules made by society.
While partially based on physical similarities within groups, race does not have an inherent physical or biological meaning.
Belief in #misinformation leads to poor judgements & decision-making, & even exerts a lingering influence on people’s reasoning after it has been corrected.
What factors lead people to form or endorse misinformed views, & what can we do about it?
The article discusses a wide range of research into addressing & combatting misinformation.
For my fellow Twitter users, please note that social media corrections are more effective when they are specific to an individual piece of content rather than a generalized warning.
Social media corrections are effective when they come from expert organizations such as a govt health agency, or from multiple other users on social media.
But particular care must be taken to avoid ostracizing people when correcting them online (something I confess to doing).
This weirdo claims that the germ theory of disease - arguably the most spectacular medical development in history, which changed the whole face of pathology & effected a complete revolution in surgery - 'lacks scientific evidence'.🤪
Too much weed? Or another book to sell? 🧐
"Garret is now sharing with global audiences his unique take on self-exploration & non-duality. Only a journey inward, toward true nature or Consciousness, will halt the activity of ego & bring what you’ve longed for all your life: peace, freedom, happiness, & love."
Okaaaay.
"I’ve rigorously worked to dissolve fifty-nine years of my own indoctrination about what makes us sick. I’ve not profited from these efforts. I’ve lost business... You know as much as anyone... You are as qualified as anyone too... regardless of your “qualifications”." #OKGarret?