A story narrated by Shri. Dharampal in his Collected Works come to my mind, in this hour of complexity.
Once Dharampal-ji was going in a train. He met a group of Yatris who were on a major tour. They had been to Rameshwaram and then were on the way to Haridwar via Delhi.
+
Out of Curiosity Shri. Dharampal asked “All of you must belong to the same Jati”. But they said “No”.
A puzzled Dharampal, like us, asked them. “How are you then sitting next to each other, sharing food and eating together”.
Our perspective of Caste System - you see!
+
What followed changed Dhampal-ji’s life. “Shrimaan, in a Yatra, there is no Jati” said those Villagers.
They belonged to various Jati. But, for the purpose of a Yatra, they could set aside their Jati customs, rules - acquire another set of customs and return back once done.
+
In this process, none of them compromised their identity. They did not drop their identity. They merely dropped certain external observations and rules, partially loosened their identity for a brief period and returned back to their original observations, rules and identity.
+
Thus, Bharateeya Parampara was adept in creating these temporal secular spaces.
We do not need Secularism - even the honest one. We just need Special Purpose Temporal Secular Spaces.
This comes easy when you share a common philosophical universe and purpose.
+
But if we want to create such Secular Spaces, then the setting aside of one’s identity/customs/rules is universal and common. One cannot seek exception, exclusion, special privilege and so on. If you value a Secular Space, then you ought to value it fully without politics.
+
If that is not possible, the only other option is Equality for all in those Common Spaces. Thus the Common Spaces are no more Secular but one occupied by each in their full might of their identity.
+
Thus, the Common Space cannot have any Transcendental Purpose such as a Yatra.
It will only become a Space for demonstration of one’s Political Might and Insecurity.
Its Unfortunate that the Liberals have ignited such a Process in India.
END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The pitiable situation of journalism today is that they are not worried about a girl being done to drashti because of refusing to convert or the murder of a boy who was leading a Saraswatee Pooja progression.
They are not even bothered about religious institutions misusing young girls for religio political purposes. They are not even bothered that they are supporting something that came as subjugating women as part of the religion.
Their ideological crisis is such that they don't even know whether they are supporting religious hegemony or religious choice or religious essentiality.
But all they want to do is to pick a stray incident blow out of proportion. Anything that demeans Jai Sriram is an opportunity
A lot of discussion about Constitution and Smriti in the last two days.
Obviously, it is a Category Mistake to compare the two, technically.
Yet, I am sympathetic of people indulging in this comparison. This thread is to explain why.
+
Let us begin by understanding the difference between the two. That will also help us to understand why the Confusion.
1. Smriti-s are an elucidation of the Purushartha perspective. It is a Dharma-Artha-Kama-Moksha enterprise. For the individual, the community and the State.
+
The Constitution is merely the Philosophy of the Modern State & a Book of Law based on that. Minimally a philosophy, maximally Law and adequately an institutional framework for the two.
It is an administrative Contract between the State & the Society, rather the individual.
Dhanyavad for yet another beautiful “Ganatantra Divas”. The Bharateeya Parampara was flowing from all of its past, through the present into its natural future.
This is to request you for a "National Heroes" Monument.
#SriAurobindo, the most important original thinker of 20th Century, was obliterated from our National Consciousness & relegated to a corner in Pondicherry for 70 years.
I sincerely thank you for bringing him back into the centre stage through the Republic Day Tableau.
+
Of course, it is now the responsibility of all of us to ensure that his personality, contribution, thought seeps into the society. Youngsters need to know him at an early age.
Thank you, also, for the National Committee to celebrate his 150 years Birth Anniversary.
#Thread - There is this point that troubles all of us. Why did Modern #Technology not happen in India, in spite of the fact that we did have a fairly advanced Science and Tech until 14th Century.
Is our way of life opposed to the kind of Technology we produce today?
+
Extending further, this results in “Is Dharma against Modern Technology, or even Technology itself? Is there a Conflict?”.
If not, what is the kind of Technology that Dharma anchors and enables.
+
This question cannot be answered directly. We need to take a step back & approach this by asking other Questions.
1. What is the Dharmic perspective of Life? 2. What is our perspective of Human nature? 3. Where does Dharma place Technology as a consequence?
Criticism is a necessary evil in public discourse. It has an evil component to it which we must not forget. Hence, it is necessary to conduct our criticism in such a manner that it results in +ve outcomes and, at the least, not in -ve outcomes.
It must have 10 attributes.
+
1. It must be “ApyayamAna”.
It must be articulated as though a parent is prevailing upon an erring child. The intention must be evident to compensate for the bitterness of Danda.
The tenor must compensate for the difficulty of the substance that one cannot see.
+
2. It must be built for “Longevity”.
The situation may be overcome, the context may get erased in time, but our criticism will stay in some form. The criticism must be relevant in some form whenever it is accessed much later in time. Else, it will stay as a negative example.
When most ancient City of the world
Where the Time finds a way to the Timeless
Where the mother of Rivers flows towards Eternity
Where the Great Divine (Mahakaal) flowed into the Civilization (Bharata Mata)
+
In our own life-time we are going to witness two important Civilizational turns.
The Nirmana of Sri Ram Mandir at Ayodhya
The Punarutthaana of Kashi Vishwanath Dham at Varanasi
+
There were many Civilizational hurdles for Sri Ram Mandir. The Secularists and Religious fundamentalists were up against it. That was a different battle.
But the one at Kashi was entirely a function of our own Will. The Sanatanis had to stand-up and do this.