Leave it to me to request something from NRO years ago where they were met with a situation they had never been met with before. 👍

Reach for the stars... and settle for nothing less.

And yes, the request completed with a released (but redacted) document: theblackvault.com/documentarchiv…
Internally, the NRO also reached out to the CIA because I threw them for a loop with my request.

They also didn't like the fact I declined a release of only unclassified portions.
Internally, one NRO official had no idea if they should be "concerned" about my request, and was seeking advice from a superior on how to handle it.
Seems like #FOIA officers may not sleep well with what I put them through... I do feel bad for that revelation!
Another request seemed to confuse them a bit, as well. Another chimed in about my "frequent" requester status - and my website.

"I'm sure he will post it to his website theblackvault.com," they said.

Yep, you better believe it!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with The Black Vault

The Black Vault Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @blackvaultcom

Feb 19
1/ I think my RT yesterday about calling others out for inaccurate information was misconstrued by some.

So, let me try to explain further the frustration that sparks posts like that.

This may be a long, but controversial, thread. But it needs to be said.

So, here goes.
2/ I truly mean no disrespect to ANY party, but I think @MiddleOfMayhem (I am NOT speaking for him) and his recent posts point out a trend. A trend that goes back to day one of visuals used to fit a narrative in this current UFO conversation. BUT they aren't accurately portrayed.
3/ And I truly mean DAY ONE of this current conversation.

In the original press conference in October 2017 that introduced Luis Elizondo to the world, a party balloon was shown to depict a tic-tac as Chris Mellon talked.

This, of course, was entirely inaccurate.

Moving on... Image
Read 17 tweets
Nov 26, 2021
1/ (rt'ing for thread response)

My take is this: I would not say I endorse the whole disinfo op claim outlined in the article. I still need to see more supporting that, and have long said I do not buy it on that level. But there is much more to this story we don't know.
2/ What I will say in response to the claims here, is that there are NUMEROUS unanswered questions throughout the last few years connected to this entire saga.

We were told many things by TTSA and those connected to it, a lot of which is now proven untrue.
3/ For example, the "chain of custody" claims about the videos they released. The false use of a stock image representing metamaterials, which was of a rock. A CGI photo in a PowerPoint presentation told to the audience as a "real" photo. Etc. Etc.
Read 7 tweets
Nov 25, 2021
1/ I know this tweet upset some, but let me add more to properly explain what I meant.

Legislative mandates, initiatives, bills, etc. are trumped by national security. I am EXCITED to see how this all plays out when it comes to UAP "transparency," but we need to be realistic.
2/ I posted yesterday how the 1960s played out very similar to today and we ended up with the Condon report. Will this be the same? I'm no fortune teller, nor is anyone, so who really knows? I just choose to be cautiously optimistic.

But, let me use a modern, non-UFO, example.
3/ President Trump, who sat in the highest office of the land, had the desire to release all JFK assassination files. He had a history of rocking the boat in D.C., and this appeared to be part of that intent.

However, national security won in the end, and secrecy prevailed.
Read 9 tweets
Nov 23, 2021
😂 Look who apparently saw my recent #FOIA release, tracked me down on eBay and sent an unsolicited offer (I never contacted them).

How nice he took a cool 50 grand off so I can own it. Any takers out there? Halfsies? Image
The one image got cut off, but this is the auction as a reminder. Image
Read 5 tweets
Sep 30, 2021
1/ Thank you to all those advocating for a respectful conversation on this between Richard & myself. There are some important issues long ignored and it's time to discuss. @RichDolan has had an open invite to be on my show w/ FULL permission to prove me wrong to my own audience.
2/ What I feel needs to be said, is I will 100% keep it respectful, as I did with Anthony Bragalia (despite that train wreck) and with @TheProjectUnity. It would not be a "pissing match" as Richard has said numerous times now. That is rubbing off on SOME of his followers...
3/ and this is completely an unfair summation. Never have I been rude to a guest on my show, and to pretend otherwise is a fantasy.

UFOlogy has come so far, and yet, gets set back so far because of silliness such as this.

My video exposed a major flaw in this entire narrative.
Read 9 tweets
Sep 28, 2021
1/ I see my colleague (and IMO friend) @RichDolan is sending out the Wilson/Davis 5 HOUR "deep dive" video he did last year. So I generated a transcript to help me find what I knew was there: a FULL reliance on the fake NRO document that many are now back tracking on.
2/ During his interview with the one now known as "Mr. X" as labeled by @TheProjectUnity - @RichDolan, with Mr. X, CLEARLY outlines the story.

I will let the transcript do the talking, but in short, it's clear as day that the NRO document IS indeed crucial to this story.
3/ Many back tracking on this say the NRO document is not mentioned in the Wilson/Davis notes, so who cares?

Although I've addressed this, Richard and Mr X also address the same in their 2020 video. It isn't referenced as "NRO Document" - but it's there alright. See here:
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!