Sam Greene Profile picture
Feb 21 30 tweets 3 min read
Putin's Donbas address is unbelievably dark and aggressive.

I've watched a lot of Putin speeches, and I don't think I've ever seen one quite like this.
"Contemporary Ukraine should be called The Vladimir I. Lenin Republic of Ukraine. And then they tore down his statues and called it de-communization. You want decommunization? We're prepared to show you what that really means for Ukraine."
This speech has none of the euphoria -- none of the high moral notes -- of Putin's 2014 Crimea address. It doesn't even have the rallying cries of his Feb. 23 2012 campaign speech.
What it does do is pour salt on just about all of the wounds Gulnaz Sharafutdinova identified in her book, The Red Mirror.
global.oup.com/academic/produ…
In other words, this is a speech designed not to make people happy, but to make them angry.
It's also worth noting that Putin really isn't a historian. It's hard to figure out what's more striking -- what he says, or what he doesn't say.
On the other hand, listening to Putin talk about the crimes of Ukrainian oligarchs is genuinely amusing.
I'm _really_ not sure it's a good idea for him to say so much about oligarchs and corruption and self-interested rulers. This will sound awfully familiar to a lot of people who were right there with him until this part.
This whole speech is -- as with his earlier essays -- laying the groundwork for the wholesale occupation of Ukraine. That doesn't mean that's where he's heading, but he's giving people a big wind-up.
It should by now be rather clear that this speech wasn't written after today's Security Council meeting.
I may be wrong, but I don't see very many ordinary Russians being all that worked up about the quality of governance in Ukraine -- which is just about all Putin has talked about in the last 20 minutes or so: corruption, poverty, mismanagement...
Switching now to threats ostensibly posed by Kyiv -- but against Russian language, religion, etc, not against Russia itself. I assume that's yet to come.
Now accusing Kyiv of sponsoring Islamist terrorism in Crimea. With support from Western intelligence agencies. Ugh.
Now come the military threats: "working with the int'l community in its geopolitical confrontation with Russia" = "preparing for war with Russia". Ukraine's ability to rebuild a nuclear arsenal is a threat.
"We cannot ignore Ukraine's military buildup."
"The US and NATO have begun the shameless takeover of Ukrainian territory as a theater of future military activity."
If this is justification for recognizing DPR/LPR, it's overkill.
Really funny to hear Putin remember that Ukraine's constitution forbids foreign bases.
Equally amusing to hear Putin say that the OSCE treaty forbids one country from achieving its security at the expense of another's.
Now pivoting to the US and NATO, ramping up the sense of threat. Throwing everything -- enlargement, anti-missile defense, etc -- into the pot, warning Russians of a possible American first strike. This is heavy stuff.
Now we're back to the potential of US missile bases in Ukraine -- blaming the US for ending INF and CFE.
I don't get paid enough to listen to this sh*t.
Interesting nugget: Putin claims he raised Russian membership in NATO in a convo with Bill Clinton, who was dismissive.

We knew Clinton had this convo with Yeltsin (and was not dismissive). But with Putin?
Now we're back to the Russian "treaty proposals". "Our principled proposals were ignored."
This really undermines the whole "we're not planning to invade" thing, doesn't it?
America's "goal is clear: to contain Russia's development. Not for any good reason, but just because we exist, and because we continue to insist on our sovereignty."
"We have every right to take measures to improve our security. Which is what we are going to do." Doesn't say how, though.
Turning now to Donbas -- accusing Ukraine of crimes against humanity, massing troops, shelling villages. "But the so-called civilized world, as our Western partners like to call themselves, prefer not to notice the genocide of almost 4 million people."
"Russia did everything to protect the territorial integrity of Ukraine."
"I find it necessary to take a long-overdue decision, to recognize the DPR and LPR. ... From those who continue their aggression, we demand an immediate and complete cease-fire."

That's it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sam Greene

Sam Greene Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @samagreene

Feb 22
I'm seeing a good deal of ire and snark about UK sanctions, and while I'm usually up for a good deal of ire and snark, I'm not sure it's entirely deserved in this case.
If you missed it, here it is, targeting the assets and operations of key banks and billionaires.

bbc.com/news/uk-politi…
Yes, it feels like small beans, compared to what the EU and the US are doing. But then the UK _is_ small beans compared to the EU and the US, which can, if they want, entirely upend the Russian economy. London can't.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 22
Again, maintaining the ambiguity — but we look set to avoid a shooting war for now.

What comes next depends on your interpretation of why Putin made his move yesterday.
If you believe he’s after Ukraine in whole or in part, then expect Putin to wait and see how Kyiv reacts viz military posture, and how US and EU react viz sanctions, and then re-calibrate his risk-reward model before deciding how far and how hard to press on.
If you believe he’s just after DNR/LNR and has written off the rest of Ukraine, then expect gradual creep to secure key infrastructure (see Georgia’s ever-shrinking borders), but probably avoiding major war (and major sanctions).
Read 7 tweets
Feb 22
So, a couple of thoughts on this:
(1) Don't worry to much;
(2) Worry a little.
axios.com/putin-ukraine-…
Here's why not to worry:

The sanctions against DPR/LPR are mostly meaningless, but they're just a placeholder for the moment. There will more to come, which I would expect to be significantly expanded sanctions against against key Russian individuals and corporations.
Here's why to worry a bit, from Psaki: "To be clear: these measures are separate from and would be in addition to the swift and severe economic measures we have been preparing in coordination with Allies and partners should Russia further invade Ukraine."
Note the word "further".
Read 10 tweets
Feb 21
Ok, a bit of analysis:

(1) Recognizing DPR/LPR means a loss of leverage for Moscow over Kyiv. It kills the Minsk process and allows Kyiv to draw a (temporary) line under the conflict and move on.
(2) War means a loss of control. Up until this moment, Putin has had maximal control: he could turn up or down the temperature as he saw fit. Once the shooting starts, he loses that control -- at least in part.
(3) Given (1) and (2) above, I my best guess is that Putin will stop at the current line of control and try to hold things there, in order to avoid escalation -- but he'll leave open the possibility of pushing further, in order to keep the pressure on.
Read 17 tweets
Feb 21
I'll leave the causal analysis for another moment, but the outcome is clear enough:
(1) Recognition of DPR/LPR;
(2) Formal insertion of Russian troops;
(3) Likely attempt to expand borders.
Immediate unanswered questions:
(1) How far will they push beyond the current line of control?
(2) Will Ukraine fight along the current LoC, or at some distance from it?
(3) Will Biden push the full package of sanctions immediately?
While nationalists and communists are pushing for regime change in Kyiv, the establishment consensus seems to be for an expanded DPR/LPR -- something like at the borders of the Donetsk & Luhansk oblasts.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 18
What we’re seeing now in Eastern Ukraine — suspicious explosions, organized evacuation of residents to Russia — does not have to mean war.

But war now feels a lot closer at hand than it did yesterday.
I’m not going to get into the business of parsing out the likelihood of possible scenarios. Not my skill set.

And I stand by my longstanding analysis that the institutions and incentives of Putin’s power augur against war. But as with any analysis, there’s a margin of error.
Errors of analysis happen. When they do, it’s important to be honest about them, and to figure out where the analysis went wrong.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(