I dont have much insight into #ForeignPolicy . I do not understand the variables and dynamics very well.

But Philosophically India should be guided by the Framework of “Purushartha” in the Foreign Policy in general and situations such as Ukraine-Russia conflict in particular.

+
1. Artha

=> We should have a list of interests that we must protect that are key to our current existence and status. Eg., Arms for Security.

=> Nothing that we do should hurt our current strengths and positions unless a new strength/position can be gained

+
2. Kama

=> Once the non-negotiable Artha-s are secure, see what long standing desires can be fulfilled

=> Look for new possibilities

Eg., By taking a neutral position can we get something more from Russia. By partaking in Relief Operations, can we build new Relationships.

+
3. Dharma

=> Our Kama indulgences, of-course, should not result in hurting any neutral country neutral to us.

=> Do we have enough Artha (Strength) to play a role in reducing the Conflict. Can we facilitate a Central Asia treaty that brings order in future.

+
4. Moksha - One would wonder if that applies in this context. It does.

-Can we make countries reshape their foreign policies so that their ideological stakes in other countries is reduced.

-Eg., Can we make some European nations to pull back their conflict seeking ideology.

+
At this Point, it is crystal clear that India has enough strengths and instruments only in Category 1 ie., in Protecting our own Artha.

For now, we are playing that role. We are doing a little in 2.

I wish we had some opportunities in Kama to create instruments against China

+
But unfortunately No. We shall stick to 1 and a little minor 2.

But more importantly, Purushartha is an effective framework in these situations.

Its a universal framework to think of one’s own interest and the good of everybody.

True one for Sarve Janah Sukhino Bhavantu!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Saamaanya Jeevi ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯ ಜೀವಿ Shivakumar

Saamaanya Jeevi ಸಾಮಾನ್ಯ ಜೀವಿ Shivakumar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SaamaanyaJ

Mar 6
The Hindu world has many things to offer. Among the many 2 important things.

1. A Philosophical basis & a set of frameworks for Diversity, Sustainability and so on.

2. A Performative Framework that is aligned with that philosophy consisting of 5 Kinds of Experiences in Balance.
Point 1 leads to a different Theory of Change and Time, very crucial for sustainability.

Point 2 is about a good composition of Performative, Consummatory, Aesthetic, Ritualistic and Renunciatory Experiences

Modernity significantly differs in both.
There are two choices in front of our society.

Find a place for yourselves within the Modern world, kind of a bubble.

Or

Digest the modern world within your Universe.

The former will be Apaddharma. The latter will be the real destination.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 19
#Thread We have sense of the Challenge posed by the TRIAD (Modernity, Monotheism & Industrial Dynamic) to the Bharateeya Sanatana Flow.

The assault is on 3 D’mns.
1. The Narrative of #Change
2. The Narrative of #Time
3. The Narrative of #Experiences

#PerformativeExperiences

+
In this, we understand the Assault on the Narratives of Change and Time.

Narrative of Change => Economic World View, Linear Progress etc.,
Narrative of Time => Political World View, Individuality etc.,

+
However, we haven’t paid attention to the 3rd Dimension of Experiences.

Bharateeya Sanatana Parampara recognised 5 Kinds of Imaginations/Experiences.

1. Performative
2. Consummatory
3. Aesthetic
4. Ritualistic
5. Renunciatory

+
Read 14 tweets
Feb 18
Harsh-ji -

This matter has to be investigated from three dimensions.
1. Shruti 2. Smriti and then 3. The Community Ground Reality.

Shruti being a First Principles, there are less chances of lineage-by-birth being explicitly referred. Not to the best of my knowledge.

+
However, that is less of a Problem. Smritis are fundamentally expositions of Purushartha for all communities through Karma and Achara based on Vedic Principles. There we have ground realities are deal with, structures, organisations, aspects, views, features are designed.

+
By birth Varna-Jati-Kula seems to be the most efficient organization for us to realise the Vedic world view of Srishti-Sthiti-Laya and be in line with Rta. Purushartha, the equality proposition of Bharateeya Parampara, is easily designed for a Kula-Jati, through various Karma.

+
Read 18 tweets
Feb 10
The pitiable situation of journalism today is that they are not worried about a girl being done to drashti because of refusing to convert or the murder of a boy who was leading a Saraswatee Pooja progression.
They are not even bothered about religious institutions misusing young girls for religio political purposes. They are not even bothered that they are supporting something that came as subjugating women as part of the religion.
Their ideological crisis is such that they don't even know whether they are supporting religious hegemony or religious choice or religious essentiality.

But all they want to do is to pick a stray incident blow out of proportion. Anything that demeans Jai Sriram is an opportunity
Read 5 tweets
Feb 8
A story narrated by Shri. Dharampal in his Collected Works come to my mind, in this hour of complexity.

Once Dharampal-ji was going in a train. He met a group of Yatris who were on a major tour. They had been to Rameshwaram and then were on the way to Haridwar via Delhi.

+
Out of Curiosity Shri. Dharampal asked “All of you must belong to the same Jati”. But they said “No”.

A puzzled Dharampal, like us, asked them. “How are you then sitting next to each other, sharing food and eating together”.

Our perspective of Caste System - you see!

+
What followed changed Dhampal-ji’s life. “Shrimaan, in a Yatra, there is no Jati” said those Villagers.

They belonged to various Jati. But, for the purpose of a Yatra, they could set aside their Jati customs, rules - acquire another set of customs and return back once done.

+
Read 8 tweets
Jan 27
#Constitution #Smriti #Dharmashastra

A lot of discussion about Constitution and Smriti in the last two days.

Obviously, it is a Category Mistake to compare the two, technically.

Yet, I am sympathetic of people indulging in this comparison. This thread is to explain why.

+
Let us begin by understanding the difference between the two. That will also help us to understand why the Confusion.

1. Smriti-s are an elucidation of the Purushartha perspective. It is a Dharma-Artha-Kama-Moksha enterprise. For the individual, the community and the State.

+
The Constitution is merely the Philosophy of the Modern State & a Book of Law based on that. Minimally a philosophy, maximally Law and adequately an institutional framework for the two.

It is an administrative Contract between the State & the Society, rather the individual.

+
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(