I dont have much insight into #ForeignPolicy . I do not understand the variables and dynamics very well.
But Philosophically India should be guided by the Framework of “Purushartha” in the Foreign Policy in general and situations such as Ukraine-Russia conflict in particular.
+
1. Artha
=> We should have a list of interests that we must protect that are key to our current existence and status. Eg., Arms for Security.
=> Nothing that we do should hurt our current strengths and positions unless a new strength/position can be gained
+
2. Kama
=> Once the non-negotiable Artha-s are secure, see what long standing desires can be fulfilled
=> Look for new possibilities
Eg., By taking a neutral position can we get something more from Russia. By partaking in Relief Operations, can we build new Relationships.
+
3. Dharma
=> Our Kama indulgences, of-course, should not result in hurting any neutral country neutral to us.
=> Do we have enough Artha (Strength) to play a role in reducing the Conflict. Can we facilitate a Central Asia treaty that brings order in future.
+
4. Moksha - One would wonder if that applies in this context. It does.
-Can we make countries reshape their foreign policies so that their ideological stakes in other countries is reduced.
-Eg., Can we make some European nations to pull back their conflict seeking ideology.
+
At this Point, it is crystal clear that India has enough strengths and instruments only in Category 1 ie., in Protecting our own Artha.
For now, we are playing that role. We are doing a little in 2.
I wish we had some opportunities in Kama to create instruments against China
+
But unfortunately No. We shall stick to 1 and a little minor 2.
But more importantly, Purushartha is an effective framework in these situations.
Its a universal framework to think of one’s own interest and the good of everybody.
However, that is less of a Problem. Smritis are fundamentally expositions of Purushartha for all communities through Karma and Achara based on Vedic Principles. There we have ground realities are deal with, structures, organisations, aspects, views, features are designed.
+
By birth Varna-Jati-Kula seems to be the most efficient organization for us to realise the Vedic world view of Srishti-Sthiti-Laya and be in line with Rta. Purushartha, the equality proposition of Bharateeya Parampara, is easily designed for a Kula-Jati, through various Karma.
The pitiable situation of journalism today is that they are not worried about a girl being done to drashti because of refusing to convert or the murder of a boy who was leading a Saraswatee Pooja progression.
They are not even bothered about religious institutions misusing young girls for religio political purposes. They are not even bothered that they are supporting something that came as subjugating women as part of the religion.
Their ideological crisis is such that they don't even know whether they are supporting religious hegemony or religious choice or religious essentiality.
But all they want to do is to pick a stray incident blow out of proportion. Anything that demeans Jai Sriram is an opportunity
A story narrated by Shri. Dharampal in his Collected Works come to my mind, in this hour of complexity.
Once Dharampal-ji was going in a train. He met a group of Yatris who were on a major tour. They had been to Rameshwaram and then were on the way to Haridwar via Delhi.
+
Out of Curiosity Shri. Dharampal asked “All of you must belong to the same Jati”. But they said “No”.
A puzzled Dharampal, like us, asked them. “How are you then sitting next to each other, sharing food and eating together”.
Our perspective of Caste System - you see!
+
What followed changed Dhampal-ji’s life. “Shrimaan, in a Yatra, there is no Jati” said those Villagers.
They belonged to various Jati. But, for the purpose of a Yatra, they could set aside their Jati customs, rules - acquire another set of customs and return back once done.
A lot of discussion about Constitution and Smriti in the last two days.
Obviously, it is a Category Mistake to compare the two, technically.
Yet, I am sympathetic of people indulging in this comparison. This thread is to explain why.
+
Let us begin by understanding the difference between the two. That will also help us to understand why the Confusion.
1. Smriti-s are an elucidation of the Purushartha perspective. It is a Dharma-Artha-Kama-Moksha enterprise. For the individual, the community and the State.
+
The Constitution is merely the Philosophy of the Modern State & a Book of Law based on that. Minimally a philosophy, maximally Law and adequately an institutional framework for the two.
It is an administrative Contract between the State & the Society, rather the individual.