Amphibious landings would also likely be accompanied by substantial helicopter assaults and support operating from land, in North-west Crimea.
This cannot land very many vehicles though, except the HALOs and even they are limited
The landings would likely face sea mines, land mines on beaches and beach obstacles. Additionally, modern anti-tank missiles and drones are a very real concern for them.
I don't want to try to predict the landing beach, but a couple of observations...
Much of the coast is heavily touristic. It is broken into short sections of beach, roughly 100 meters wide. Quite short beach them often an urban environment.
This is a challenging place to land
East of Odessa, toward the attack from Ukraine, there are a lot of rivers breaking the coastline into segments. Pros and cons but risk of becoming contained by the terrain if you land here
To the east there are a lot of these narrow beaches with water behind them. I think that this would be a terrible place to land. Sitting ducks.
Any landing seems like suicide, but Russia might be committed.
Possible reasons (speculation!):
a) to aid the land thrust from Crimea towards Odessa
b) to take Odessa directly
c) land bridge to Transnistria, Moldova
Thanks for your time, hopefully helpful
Another aspect (forgot to mention...)
Russian forces are likely to land in daylight. This makes them more vulnerable
It is not clear which infantry will be used, and whether they are trained for amphibious assaults. Logistics drivers etc too. There were unverified reports of mutiny in Naval Infantry units about a landing, so might be other troops now
Russia also has a number of smaller landing ships, amphibious boats and assault boats.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Highlights:
* Amphibious landings west of #Mariupol, coord with land-based attacks
* civilian ships attacked
* Attack on Snake Island Feb 24 - SLAVA cruiser
Obviously we have woken up to a major invasion of #Ukraine by #Russia. I am not going to be one of those #OSINT people who try to capitalize on war for Social Media reasons. But I will follow naval aspects. Mostly analysis
Right now there is a Russian navy hydrographic vessel near #Odessa. Likely weather intelligence for Russian forces, not sexy but important
There are also a number of warships, some with kalibr cruise missiles. These are likely firing missiles in ‘first day’ strategic strikes. But vessels carry relatively few missiles. Kilo submarines only 2-4
It's not specifically #USNavy, but is intended to be relevant. It does have a USN style in some respects. I think that the US Navy's SSN(X) will incorporate many things discussed in the article, but might look a bit more conventional
The layout is unconventional to challenge the assumed layout of current boats. The stern rudder/sail is plausible, and might have some advantages (now that sails are mostly about masts which are non-penetrating). But it has disadvantages also.