THREAD 1/10 Judging by the words of Russia’s chief negotiator, Vladimir Medinsky, a second topic has emerged in Russian-Ukrainian peace talks: the issue of sanctions against Russia (and their lifting). This both complicates the issue and the peace process and gives it a chance
2/10 On the upside, a situation in which Russia needs something creates new opportunities. Before, Russia was choosing where to stop based on events on the ground. Now that decision is also being determined by the chance to get some sanctions lifted in exchange for an agreement.
3/10 Neutral status for Ukraine and restrictions on the volume and types of weapons to be held by the Ukrainian army with external guarantees could probably be agreed in exchange for peace and the lifting of some sanctions relatively quickly.
4/10 Moscow may also be ready to drop its demand for immediate regime change: this was always expressed ambiguously and was likely meant in the event of the current political leadership collapsing, which hasn’t happened.
5/10 That leaves on the table Moscow’s demand that Ukraine recognize Crimea and the Donbas republics as part of Russia. Russia will clearly try to extend its control to all of the contested Donetsk and Luhansk regions while the talks are ongoing.
6/10 Ukraine now has two negotiating positions. The first is the recognition of Crimea and the Donbas, which it does not want to give way on.
7/10 The second is the lifting of sanctions, which it is, in theory, prepared to compromise on, especially if means less pressure on the issue of recognition (for which there are in theory several options: deferred status, the “Irish option”, a future referendum).
8/10 Russia also has two negotiating positions: the position of its troops on the ground, and its ability to inflict further damage on Ukraine without sustaining any damage to its own territory (excluding sanctions of course)
9/10 The problem with sanctions is that they mean a third party imperceptibly appears in the peace talks. The source of the main sanctions is not Ukraine: it can only recommend that Western countries lift sanctions in exchange for certain conditions achieved to bring about peace.
10/10 Ukraine may even find it has to persuade countries to revoke their sanctions against Russia. And those conditions now may be formulated taking into account that the lifting of sanctions could become part of the conflict’s resolution.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD 1/8 The secrecy of preparations for the Russian military invasion was detrimental to the expertise obtained when making decisions.
2/8 If you can’t ask experts direct questions & openly discuss the answers with the competent people, you inevitably get a distorted picture of reality.
3/8 Russia’s leader is used to acting as though within a covert special operation, but there comes a time when secrecy stops being helpful even to its adepts.
Short THREAD 1/6 The Russian parliament has passed a law that essentially bans any discussion of Russia’s military and political actions, as well as the discussion of other countries’ actions with regard to Russia.
2/6 It’s always fascinating when parliaments adopt emergency laws that deprive parliamentarians themselves of any real power (eg to discuss issues & consult the executive based on their own expertise rather than the executive’s whims) & then repress those same parliamentarians.
3/6 The mechanism at work is very simple. The thinking is: “if I vote against it, I will be repressed immediately. If I vote for it, I might be repressed in the future, but then again, I might not.
THREAD 1/12 Recognizing the independence of the Donbas republics was unexpected because it was seen as an overly simple and therefore unlikely outcome that doesn’t reflect the scale of the arsenal of tools at Russia’s disposal.
2/12 The recognition is a chance for Russia to climb down from the peak of escalation with a concrete result, because retreating empty-handed would have been a ruinous outcome for the Kremlin’s prestige, and for the country’s military and diplomatic apparatus.
3/12 Russia had three options: pressing Kyiv to federalize through the implementation of the Minsk agreements, pushing the West to end NATO’s expansion, and recognizing the Donbas republics. Having failed to achieve the two main goals, Russia resorted to the third option.
THREAD 1/6 Given that Putin doesn’t like to be predictable or follow anyone else’s timetable, and that his actions are governed by the logic of special ops, there is some confusion over current events.
2/6 Was the buildup of troops and threat of invasion of Ukraine a cover operation for Russia recognizing the breakaway republics of Donetsk and Luhansk? Or will recognition of the territories be a cover operation for invading Ukraine and toppling its current regime?
3/6 Or is all of this together a cover operation for Russia’s main diplomatic goal: forcing Kyiv to implement the Minsk agreements and to federalize, and forcing the West to give Russia security guarantees and halt NATO expansion?
THREAD 1/10 During the frantic diplomatic contacts of the recent days, Putin has given the appearance of someone who would be satisfied with any of the possible outcomes.
2/10 Either this hard diplomacy will result in convincing victories, or it will pave the way for Russia to guarantee its security using whatever means it considers necessary. It’s possible that those means may include actions relating to Ukraine bit.ly/3GXOUnN
3/10 In all their recent public statements, Russian officials have stubbornly come back to two points: that at the foundation of the current Ukrainian regime lies a coup d’etat, and that Ukraine is not implementing the Minsk agreements.
THREAD 1/13 Moscow’s goal is clear: it wants the world to listen to it and to realize that the country speaking is not the same as the one that once lost the Cold War. Russia has a new confidence that has inspired it to revert to the language of the Soviet superpower.
2/13 That confidence springs from several sources. The first is Russia’s modernized army and new weapons. Judging by some of Putin’s statements, he is confident that Russia has a temporary technological advantage in some types of weapons, and that the West knows it.
3/13 Secondly, modern Russia is not the Soviet Union, and as for now did not lose anything to anyone. bit.ly/3gkhMLT