Neoliberalism blames individuals for poverty - hiding its manufacture by political choices. ML does a lot of good but still built a £123m career off that ideology.
He finally breaks his (very political) "apolitical" rule & the Left paints him as a working class anti-hero.
🧵1/5
He's helped people (myself included). If he'd same career while using his platform to challenge narrative that poverty is about poor money management that'd be fine but he had a material stake in the neoliberal narrative. Profiting millions off that is quite uncomfortable.
2/5
There's an industry built around this. All the upcycling TV shows (good in itself but not when branded as a poverty solution). All the nutrition shows that use participants to show how easily the middle classes can switch consumption, shaming how others feed their kids.
3/5
Is this different from the "stop being poor" / "everyone has the same 24 hours"?
Is it much better than poverty porn, benefits scroungers shows or "broken Britain"? The demonisation of the working class - too feckless to work, to stupid to spend properly. @OwenJones84
4/5
Yes, people like Martin Lewis have helped people in an immediate sense. But after decades of being "apolitical" & disguising the root causes of a system their career relies on can they so easily be accepted with open arms by those who campaign so hard against poverty?
5/5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Firstly, there's no disagreement between us. Starmer has proven one of the most ingenuine politicians in our history. He has repeatedly rowed back on his leadership pledges & sentiments and proven untrustworthy in his words and actions as leader.
2/
He has been a babe in the woods. Policy illiterate and not particularly interested in ideas. Electorally inept, taking the hand of his elders when he's lost and then caught in the headlights when the strategy handed to him doesn't work.
3/